|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
2 Jun 2010, 08:43 (Ref:2703018) | #1 | ||
Admin
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,058
|
Force India To Sue Lotus
"The Force India F1 Team confirms it has instigated UK civil proceedings against 1Malaysia Racing Team SDN BHD (a Malaysian company), 1Malaysia Racing Team (UK) Limited (Lotus Racing's parent companies), Michael Gascoyne and Aerolab SRL."
http://tentenths.com/news/showentry.php?e=638 |
||
|
2 Jun 2010, 08:56 (Ref:2703028) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,187
|
Well I could see that coming, the Lotus was a real threat to the Force India car!!!
|
||
__________________
Let's make better mistakes tomorrow! |
2 Jun 2010, 09:01 (Ref:2703034) | #3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,493
|
Presumably they'll be fined $100m if found guilty.
|
|
|
2 Jun 2010, 10:51 (Ref:2703112) | #4 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
||
|
2 Jun 2010, 12:59 (Ref:2703201) | #5 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
Although, I hardly think that too much fuss will be made if Lotus get booted out of F1. Someone should have told them that you need to be much more established in F1 before you can even think about getting away with stealing other peoples property. |
||
|
2 Jun 2010, 13:34 (Ref:2703222) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 591
|
Quote:
|
||
|
2 Jun 2010, 13:43 (Ref:2703224) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,607
|
Here is the most shocking statement: "Force India confirms it paid approximately one million euros in autumn 2009 to secure the payment claimed by Aerolab"
Force India paid someone? |
||
|
2 Jun 2010, 14:07 (Ref:2703232) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 188
|
Well, stealing floppy disks isn't that severe we've learned. So we'll have to wait to find out how aero models will be treated.
It's interesting that Force India doesn't want Lotus to be punished but instead just tries to save some money by not paying a contractor. |
||
|
2 Jun 2010, 09:04 (Ref:2703036) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Aerolab have provided Lotus with indemnity - Autosport a few days ago.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
2 Jun 2010, 09:08 (Ref:2703040) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,834
|
Shock horror. F1 cars in look-a-like claim...
|
||
__________________
Tim Yorath Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch Fan of "the sacred monster Christophe Bouchut"... |
2 Jun 2010, 12:21 (Ref:2703170) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
This is different, this appears to be an issue with Aerolab rather than Lotus.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
2 Jun 2010, 12:48 (Ref:2703191) | #12 | ||
Admin
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 12,058
|
So I'm wondering if Aerolab's "indemnity" they issued to Lotus will mean they will pay any fines? Could still result in a Lotus exit from the championship.
If they still have an "entry" but are excluded from the champioships, does that mean they can pick and choose which races (if any) to run at for the remainder of this year and then use the savings for future car development? |
||
|
2 Jun 2010, 15:39 (Ref:2703275) | #13 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 692
|
Ah, what a shame.
I do hope Lotus are up and coming stars of the future, and can live up to the "Lotus" name. |
|
__________________
Please, call me dye. |
2 Jun 2010, 15:48 (Ref:2703283) | #14 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Maybe Force India are a little aggrieved about somthing?
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/84094 |
|
|
2 Jun 2010, 17:29 (Ref:2703338) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
That was only announced today.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
2 Jun 2010, 20:04 (Ref:2703419) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 2,306
|
But wern't someone like Renault found with information of another and then only got a slap on the wrist compared to Mclarens punishment
|
||
|
2 Jun 2010, 20:59 (Ref:2703455) | #17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
Yeah, supposedly stuff about McLaren fuel, cooling and gear system and some unusual suspension part on the silver cars. Nothing came of that one. Of course, things did come of when Nelsinho threw it in to the concrete.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
2 Jun 2010, 23:05 (Ref:2703516) | #18 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
This leads to a whole lot of interesting questions.
Bearing in mind that wind tunnel work is strictly limited: 1) How does the FIA police work done by third party suppliers? What stops 3rd parties running their own unlimited tests on F1 models? 2) If a third party supplier represents more than one team what stops them sharing the info between their customers and hence massively increasing the development available to 2 or three customers? ie 2 days each team is 6 days for three teams and triple the development time for each team sharing the info. |
|
|
3 Jun 2010, 00:23 (Ref:2703539) | #19 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,174
|
Its a shame Lotus didnt steal the design for the Force India's gearbox & shift mechanism
|
||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! #CANCERSUCKS |
3 Jun 2010, 00:45 (Ref:2703544) | #20 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,292
|
Who knows what punishment the FIA will dish out when it spins its wheel-o-punishment randomiser...
|
||
|
3 Jun 2010, 01:48 (Ref:2703563) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
|||
|
3 Jun 2010, 09:48 (Ref:2703734) | #22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
I can't believe that you made my signature chronologically relevant again.
|
||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
3 Jun 2010, 09:54 (Ref:2703736) | #23 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,493
|
||
|
3 Jun 2010, 09:55 (Ref:2703737) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
|||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Force India, are they that bad? | cds_uk | Formula One | 38 | 28 Apr 2009 11:43 |
[Team] McLaren and Force India | youngoldy | Formula One | 11 | 6 Mar 2009 10:13 |
Force India's VJM02 | Razor | Formula One | 5 | 4 Mar 2009 09:38 |
Force India livery | 429CJ | Formula One | 47 | 1 Jan 2008 13:14 |
Who will get the second Force India seat? | cds_uk | Formula One | 47 | 29 Nov 2007 01:04 |