|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
29 Sep 2009, 12:01 (Ref:2550453) | #1151 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
|
||
|
29 Sep 2009, 12:46 (Ref:2550489) | #1152 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
So at this rate, the R15 is probably gonna be Audi Sport's biggest waste of money unless Audi can be convinced to open things up for more races.
|
||
|
29 Sep 2009, 14:36 (Ref:2550563) | #1153 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 286
|
Quote:
Or if the ACO stops messing with Aero year after year. Must be real frustrating to homologate a car, change aero on it 2-3 times a year because of ACO requests and then have to have a giant redesign in the off season cause of new aero rules yet again and only for one year of racing due to another giant rule shift. This would be hard to explain to a board of directors in good economic terms, let alone the one we are in now. |
|||
|
29 Sep 2009, 14:42 (Ref:2550567) | #1154 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
Doesn't stop F1 teams from spending $100-300 million a year for cars that become obsolete after 1 years worth of use-a full season ALMS program for Audi in the R10 days(2006-'08) cost $15 million. But it's hard to justify such things when the budget is set and Audi doesn't want to spend much more on it.
Hence, the waste of money comments-Audi seems to want to return to the ALMS on at least the basis of running many of the races, if not the full schedule if they can help it. But having to spend that much money on a car to basically rebuild it for one year because of one team's whining-and that team maybe not racing at LM next year anyways to boot-is the dumbest thing I heard in a long time. Maybe Audi should just run ALMS only next year and ditch Le Mans-Dyson does it, and Penske did it, and Acura's doing it. Maybe this is what Audi gets for supporting the ACO through thick and thin for the last decade. |
||
|
29 Sep 2009, 15:09 (Ref:2550579) | #1155 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
That does not make any sense at all. Who would they race in ALMS? Acura is leaving. In Le Mans they can at least compete against Peugeot.
|
|
|
29 Sep 2009, 15:36 (Ref:2550604) | #1156 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
||
|
29 Sep 2009, 16:04 (Ref:2550627) | #1157 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Acura "may" be leaving, but that doesn't mean that "Acuras" will be leaving. Expect at least Mazda, Porsche and Acura nameplates to compete against.
|
||
|
29 Sep 2009, 16:56 (Ref:2550660) | #1158 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
29 Sep 2009, 21:13 (Ref:2550813) | #1159 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Those small, biobutanol turbo fours will be quite something. Hopefully the ALMS won't just drop the weight of the P2 cars, but also give them a little larger restrictor so that the power can go up and we can see those Mazdas sideways on a few occasions.
Chris |
||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
30 Sep 2009, 01:08 (Ref:2550927) | #1160 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,475
|
Although the ALMS hasn't announced the equalization formula yet, I thought it was going to be more like slowing the P1 cars down to match the P2 cars. But then again I have also heard from Mr. A. that they want to return to the 2008 rules that produced good racing, so I guess we'll have to wait and see. Slowing the P1 cars would make a little sense since that is more close to what the 2011 P1 rules will look like.
|
||
|
30 Sep 2009, 02:07 (Ref:2550937) | #1161 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
But the potential 2011 rules seem to require so many technical changes it wouldn't be the same if you just slowed P1s to that level. However, with all the backlash from manufacturers and privateers I'd be surprised if the ACO didn't reconsider their decisions to constantly change the rules. I think it was Jutner who said Audi may go as far as leaving ACO prototype racing if the economics don't add up. But manufacturers coming and going is a part of top level sports car racing.
Chris |
||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
30 Sep 2009, 04:45 (Ref:2550962) | #1162 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
I would like to be educated on this please. As far as I know the petrol engines have been the same since at least 01, the diesels the same since their intro in 04/05. Which also was the last major chassis rule chage (which was a phase in). So how is that constantly changing the rules? Or does the wing change for this year quantify constant change? Lets not forget that the mfgs., including the customer car mfgs., usually do an aero update every year anyways, so how does that truly merit the angst towards the ACO (in the light of constant change). Also it has been common knowledge that there was a 3:30 barrier all along and if it was pierced that the cars would be brought back into line, also is the mix was the increased frequency of airborn incidents to which the wing was a stop gap fix and there would be more to rectify the problem coming in the future (this to rectify a safety issue!). I do agree that the ACO should hold off on the implimentation of the aero fix (especially with the current economic clime) until the 2011 rule set (no airborn incidents), which they have in the most part, via Mike, except the frt aero. Which is, IMO, the ACO closing the loophole that Audi took advantage of and appeasing Peugeot and others in the process. So what have I missed, other than minutiae? L.P. |
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
30 Sep 2009, 09:43 (Ref:2551069) | #1163 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Minutia?
A shame "minutia" costs hundred thousand dollars plus everytime.... Oh, and on topic, I doubt we see the R15 racing much in the ALMS next year. |
||
|
30 Sep 2009, 10:23 (Ref:2551098) | #1164 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
Depends on the ACO's 2010 rules(yet to be made offical aside from proposals), ALMS LMP1/2 equvalancy formula(again yet to be made offical), and where Audi will get the money to do a full ALMS season-it cost Audi $15 million to run the R10 in the ALMS in both '07 and '08, and it stands to reason that the R15 would cost at least as much, and finding outside sponsors to pony up that cash isn't easy, which is why Audi and Peugeot sposored themselves with their TDI and HDi-FAP branding, along with Shell(Audi) and Total(Peugeot).
Audi would probably like to run in the ALMS next year for if nothing else to advertize their diesel cars(the raison d'être for the R10 and the R15 in the first place), but where are they gonna get the money, especially if the Audi board is skeptical over the ACO's proposed rules and IMSA proposed LMP equalization. |
||
|
30 Sep 2009, 16:12 (Ref:2551339) | #1165 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
Quote:
So I must not have missed anything, if all that can be done is, complain about the cost of parts of/on a carbon fiber prototype race car. Which I grant you are quite expensive, and alluded to in my post by agreeing, that was one of, if not the main reason, to wait until 2011 to impliment the further changes!!!!! L.P. |
||||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
30 Sep 2009, 19:20 (Ref:2551471) | #1166 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Why won't we see the R15 in the ALMS next year?
http://murphythebear.com/blog/index....-hip/#more-539 |
||
|
30 Sep 2009, 20:38 (Ref:2551479) | #1167 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,710
|
Shouldnt it be possible to run a season for less than 15Mil$?
|
||
|
30 Sep 2009, 21:06 (Ref:2551498) | #1168 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
Chris |
|||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
1 Oct 2009, 07:42 (Ref:2551707) | #1169 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
Did anyone say that the ACO or IMSA had to make sense? Audi and even Peugeot think that's the case.
The future of Audi Sport's LMP program is unclear because the ACO and IMSA won't come clear with their proposed rules changes-the ACO has been rather coy about the front end areo regs proposals(ie, they haven't gone into specifics), and IMSA hasn't come clean about how the LMP class for next will have the cars equalized yet-hopes are that the return to the '08 formula(LMP1s run to ACO regs, LMP2s run with lighter weight and/or more power). And then there's the ACO's cherished(and if you ask me, stupid) 3:30 limit, which is partly driving those rules. I think that Marshall Pruett has a good idea-if the ACO's so concerned about speeds at LM, make the teams run high downforce sprint race bodywork, and smaller air restrictors, instead of making daft, short-sighted rules that cost teams time and money to come up with solutions that have no long term validitiy. That's a sign that the ACO only pretty much cares about the LM24, and little else. And for IMSA, Audi might race there next year, but the LMP1/2 equlization regs haven't been published. Some say that a return to the '08 regs mentioned previously is the way, but there are rumors that LMP1s may be slowed to near LMP2 levels, or that the regs would meet both half way. I doubt that Audi(and other teams) appreciates having to modify the R15 from ACO performance regs just to run in the ALMS. Basically, if the ACO and IMSA agreed to leave the rules alone for 2010, Audi would've been back in the ALMS and at Le Mans in a heartbeat. But now, they have to see how things play out before making a decision. We've already lost Aston Martin for 2010, Peugeot seems to be on the way out for next year as a factory team, and Audi may be headed that way. Unless things change(IMSA and the ACO do as they should-stablize the rules for 2010 as far as the ACO, and IMSA running the combined LMP classes to the '08 formula, or the econony has an explosive boom soon), both parties may've screwed themselves for next year, and they only have themselves to blame-if a company that has supported and propped up sportscar racing for a decade says that there are big problems, then that should be a wake up call. |
||
|
1 Oct 2009, 11:47 (Ref:2551829) | #1170 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,244
|
re. the rear bodywork changes, it appears there is waiver for cars built before 2010. Audi, Peugeot and Aston Martin know that 2011 will require new cars and are working on them as of now.
What the ACO needs to do in 2011 is freeze the rules until 2014 and stop fiddiling with them! |
||
__________________
"On a given day, a given circumstance, you think you have a limit. And you then go for this limit and you touch this limit, and you think, 'Okay, this is the limit.' And so you touch this limit, something happens and you suddenly can go a little bit further. With your mind power, your determination, your instinct, and the experience as well, you can fly very high." -Ayrton Senna |
1 Oct 2009, 15:14 (Ref:2551989) | #1171 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 435
|
In Autosport today it says the ACO have given Audi permission to run the R15 with only minor changes next year, much to Peugeots chagrin.
|
||
|
1 Oct 2009, 18:46 (Ref:2552157) | #1172 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,710
|
|||
|
1 Oct 2009, 18:51 (Ref:2552163) | #1173 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,980
|
Quote:
Somehow it seems harder to argue that a slower illegal car should be banned. Nice to see the ACO taking the good pragmatic decision to keep Audi on board. |
|||
|
1 Oct 2009, 18:57 (Ref:2552173) | #1174 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Quote:
Peugeot didn't file for banning the R15!, but for clarification on why the R15 was allowed to run with the certain aero parts, which was believed to be illegal. Peugeot knew that ACO would never ban Audi from the 24h Le Mans. |
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
1 Oct 2009, 19:02 (Ref:2552174) | #1175 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
And you still have not convinced anybody of that being the case it seems.
L.P. |
||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Audi R10 TDi demo drives in Italy | Aslak Vind | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5 | 7 Oct 2008 13:53 |
Audi R15 , What could it be ? | The Badger | Sportscar & GT Racing | 70 | 5 Oct 2008 02:16 |
Marcel fässler drives Audi R10 TDI in America | Aslak Vind | Sportscar & GT Racing | 39 | 4 Aug 2008 16:15 |
TDI and Our plans! | Cryos | Rallying & Rallycross | 8 | 9 Mar 2005 21:41 |
Penalty for Champion Audi? (thread closed) | LouisTheShark | Sportscar & GT Racing | 14 | 19 Oct 2003 20:06 |