Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 1 Jan 2005, 19:26 (Ref:1191181)   #1
Super Tourer
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Super Tourer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
United Kingdom
East Anglia
Posts: 4,304
Super Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSuper Tourer should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
F1's Revenue Stream.

In the January issue of BusinessF1 their cover story is BE and the banks, part of the article covers projected revenue for 2005.

We rarely see any figures behind F1, so any glimpse is always interesting. Obviously these are topline figures.

Predicted revenue for F1 (essentially FOM's income).

2005 - $710M

Ten years ago the figure was only $126M, from this it shows that the biggest increase in revenue comes from TV rights, which were only $50M in 1994. Circuit fee's were $40M in 1994.

Of the $710M the bulk of of it is TV rights ($380M), with circuit fees contributing ($190M). Then we have trackside advertising bringing in $60M. hospitality $35M with a similar amount from race sponsorship. Finally video games rights bring in $10M.

Under the alleged current shareout, FOM/BE and the assorted companies take 60% ($426M) with the 10 teams sharing the remaining $284M.

In the 2002 accounts for Formula One Association ltd the turnover (revenue) was $642M, with cost of sales at $288M (presumably largely the payments to the teams)

The above is essentially what the GPWC/BE argument is about so it's interesting to see some figures attached to the debate. It's also clear that the alleged extra $500M BE has offered the teams over 3 years (IIRC) doesn't make much of a dent in the income.

I've recently read that the GPWC believe that they can increase revenue to around $1Bn per year, believing F1 to be commercially under developed in some areas.

It's also evident that whoever runs F1 costs still need to be cut dramatically.

To put F1's current $700M annual income into perspective, Toyota and Ferrari alone probably spend that in a year between them. Next year, the 10 teams on the grid will probably spend $2Bn between them, if they took every penny of the available revenue, they would still be footing 75% of the bill themselves.
Super Tourer is offline  
__________________
'I've seen it, but still don't believe it.....'
Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
They should stream A1 on the net C.U.Motorsport A1GP 40 12 Mar 2006 20:11
F3 Zandvoort video stream Dutch chap National & International Single Seaters 1 27 Aug 2005 11:57
Denver Race Sponsorship Stratagies - 7X Improvement in Revenue Snrub ChampCar World Series 1 24 Jun 2005 05:07
F1 game with slip-stream? f1grandprixshop Virtual Racers 12 6 Sep 2001 14:10


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:16.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.