|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
12 Jul 2010, 02:46 (Ref:2725192) | #11 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Silverstone and the stewards once again guilty of an odd penalty.
Alonso avoids a collision with Kubica by running wide, is ordered to let Kubica back through - fair enough, then ordered to serve a drive through when Kubica's car breaks down before it can be let through. How does this fit in with the previous decisions allowing both Alonso and Hamilton to overtake in pit lane entrance by leaving the circuit entirely? |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Rules] Drivers as stewards! | Fox89 | Formula One | 8 | 12 Dec 2009 15:05 |
Stewards | skaife2 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 18 | 16 Jul 2009 13:38 |
The IPO and STEWARDS have to GO !~ ! | Matt H | Australasian Touring Cars. | 58 | 29 Aug 2005 22:18 |
Stewards = God | Archer | Australasian Touring Cars. | 21 | 15 Nov 2003 03:37 |
Stewards are a terrible | Scott75 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 55 | 28 May 2003 12:52 |