|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
3 Aug 2007, 14:49 (Ref:1979913) | #26 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,408
|
Quote:
Ultimate Motorsport, have been running Mygales in BF3 this season, are said to be talking to Dallara this weekend about switching to the Italian marque next year. Don't even mention Lola. They actually have a decent chassis there, but have completely bungled the real opportunity they had to break into the F3 market. |
|||
|
3 Aug 2007, 14:52 (Ref:1979916) | #27 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 361
|
new VW engine being debuted at nurburgring euro f3 round this year apparently
|
|
__________________
moments forever faded |
3 Aug 2007, 15:15 (Ref:1979937) | #28 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,020
|
Quote:
Trouble is that Dallara have done such a good job over many years now that it will always be difficult to break into F3 as a manufacturer unless you are prepared to take a very long term view & subsidise teams for a good few years before you get your money back. In the unlikely event that Dallara produce a dog in 08, they'll still sell grid fulls! |
|||
__________________
Born in the Midlands, made in the Royal Navy |
3 Aug 2007, 15:49 (Ref:1979963) | #29 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,408
|
Quote:
Later on Steven Kane had an emotional win at Mondello, which, like Lola, is owned by Martin Birrance, and I think at point they thought they had cracked it. They produced a revised and improved version of the car for last season, but instead of supporting a decent team to to continue to run it in BF3, they went to the German F3 Cup and, to be fair, had some very good results. But if they thought this was on a par with BF3 and the F3 Euroseries, they were kidding themselves. This was proved at Zandvoort, where they were slaughtered. I think one car was withdrawn and another pulled off at the end of the warm-up lap. So, yes, In my opinion there was a complete failure on the part of those holding the purse strings to support the venture and show genuine commitment. There are some decent people at Lola and they deserve better. As you say, the market is dominated by Dallara, but they are so well organised and produce such a good car that I can't begrudge them their success. These things don't happen by accident. |
|||
|
3 Aug 2007, 16:25 (Ref:1979989) | #30 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
Quote:
05 - 07 spec Chassis - theres Dome - abandoned but super fast - beats the Jap Dallara's but was only ever fitted with the Super Honda Lola - did well in Germany but was never fashionable Ligier - only one ever built? - driven by Hulkenberg - nice looking SLC R1 - abandoned but very strong aerodynamically Mygale - Increasingly competitive but not as quick as the Dallara yet Dallara - still the benchmark The Lola maybe better than the Dallara or at least its match but it doesn't have 90+ drivers running and developing them. The Dome was a wasted opportunity. |
|||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
3 Aug 2007, 16:41 (Ref:1979997) | #31 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,208
|
Doesn't Ligier use Ralt gearbox?
|
||
|
3 Aug 2007, 20:28 (Ref:1980113) | #32 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,020
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Born in the Midlands, made in the Royal Navy |
3 Aug 2007, 20:40 (Ref:1980124) | #33 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,020
|
Quote:
Sorry, this has turned into a chassis thread & not a VW engine thread but I do think that it is a massive shame that F3 has turned into a one make formula for Dallara Mercs. Perhaps the F3 rules should be changed substantially somehow to produce a clean sheet of paper approach for which no single manufacturer has the blueprint & use the engines from the WTCC/ Formula Masters series to allow a number of different engine manufacturers to be represented. (F Masters would then die, I guess) |
|||
__________________
Born in the Midlands, made in the Royal Navy |
4 Aug 2007, 11:54 (Ref:1980402) | #34 | |||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,195
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||||
__________________
Give me a drink don't be talking so much you're a pain in the butt - Mick |
4 Aug 2007, 12:10 (Ref:1980409) | #35 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,069
|
Quote:
If you look very closely at the leading British teams you will see all manner of different bodywork and suspension parts which aren't produced by Dallara. |
|||
|
4 Aug 2007, 17:43 (Ref:1980776) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
Only very minor stuff John - the last major mod to a Dallara F3 car was the Rosberg tail as far as I can remember and that was on the F304
I think everyone in racing wants to see an exciting multi chassis, multi engine, multi box F3 but at the end of the day its a business and if rich dad / rich driver wants the fashionable car that won last year - he'll darn well get it. Sod learning to develop a chassis let a team do that, the driver just wants to win and move on. Also few team are willing to take a risk by doing something different. But of course Carroll Smith would say that the last of the old will always beat the first of the new. So everyone sticks with what they know. Of course Paul Van Valkenburgh would likely interject pointing out that a new or small team would stand not chance of beating the likes of Carlin whilst using the same kit. So the only way to move forward would be to look what everyone else is doing and then don something different. The First of the new. Who ever is the second of the new however... |
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
4 Aug 2007, 18:50 (Ref:1980841) | #37 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,069
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
4 Aug 2007, 20:48 (Ref:1980896) | #38 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
could you point me in the right direction John as I must have missed it - the F305/6/7 came with mono, twin and triple damper layouts as standard - I've not noticed any deviations from that?
|
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
5 Aug 2007, 01:38 (Ref:1981147) | #39 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 207
|
F305 came with twin damper as standard. But most euroseries teams went back over to the mono damper, presumably it suits the Kumho's.
Triple damper was individually developed by teams. A few front running teams have developed there own suspension configurations, most notably Manor and ASM. I beleive Manor were the team that came up with the swept back rear suspension, later adopted by Dallara. Fortec have also made their own suspension, in wide track, although I beleive the mansells are back to standard suspension due to a deal with Dallara. Dallara have never released any big updates for the F305, but its never had any challengers, so I think they have a lot up there sleeve, ready to unleash should anyone come close to beating them. |
|
__________________
David Matthew Neil. |
5 Aug 2007, 07:10 (Ref:1981225) | #40 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,020
|
I admit that I'm old fashioned but my formative motor racing years were spent watching F3 races with Ralt, March, Chevron & Argo all winning races - that's what I mean by a multi-chassis formula.
|
||
__________________
Born in the Midlands, made in the Royal Navy |
5 Aug 2007, 07:33 (Ref:1981234) | #41 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
Which is fine if you are a constructor, or an engineer, a technofreak observer or a rich driver. But not if you want a true DRIVERS championship. |
||
|
5 Aug 2007, 23:07 (Ref:1982048) | #42 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
no, you're right. if you want a true drivers championship, you give them all the same car and let them figure it out for themselves. just like formula renault.
singlehandedly striking a blow to the non-f1 engineering future of the sport. |
|
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
6 Aug 2007, 06:49 (Ref:1982192) | #43 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,020
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Born in the Midlands, made in the Royal Navy |
6 Aug 2007, 07:45 (Ref:1982214) | #44 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
Given that there is far more interest in the off-track antics of the drivers in F1, rather than on it, is that such a bad thing?! Technology (interesting as it is to me) has destroyed the racing in F1. You get more overtaking in a single kart or Caterham race than you get in a season of F1. And it's even more difficult to decide who the best driver really is. To me, racing is mainly about the competition between drivers, and overtaking on the track, not in the pits. Unfortunately in F3, and even more so in F1, its a competition between engineers. The regulations in both series need to make the driver a significantly more important component. |
||
|
6 Aug 2007, 13:32 (Ref:1982553) | #45 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
Dallara F305 came with twin or mono front as standard - and twin or triple at the rear. I stand corrected and will go and read my own stuff a bit more closely next time!!
Quote:
The most exciting single seat racing in the UK is Formula Vee - famed for its technical freedom... the best F3 race I've ever watched had five different chassis in it and four engines. Is a single chassis F3 really cheaper than a multichassis? or do you have to spend the same amount for smaller gains? I've never run an F3 car so I honestly have no idea of the real costs of development but I do suspect things are geared towards the driver not the car. But I also agree that Dallara are sandbagging a bit - whilst both Lola and Dome beat them in Germany and Japan on pace there was never a real commercial threat - so no big updates. By the way does the F307 really exist or do they wear F305 chassis plates? and was there an '07 update kit like there was in '06? If it was all about the drivers then the sport would be even more dull - the current crop of international single seater drivers are the dullest people there are - no real personalities at all at least from a media perspective (which for spectators etc.) is what matters. Rudolfo Gonzalez is a one of only a few notable exceptions Last edited by ss_collins; 6 Aug 2007 at 13:34. |
|||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
6 Aug 2007, 14:08 (Ref:1982574) | #46 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
In any case the vast majority of F1 watchers have not the slightest idea about the subtleties of mass dampers, flexy floors and wings. Even if you consider the vast costs of F1 ( and very high ones of F3) as acceptable (which I obviously don't), surely you can't be happy with the lack of racing. When the worlds premier formula produces pretty much the worlds most boring racing (if it can really be called that) something has gone seriously wrong. And when does it get half decent? When it rains - and the driver comes into the equation! I personally don't care whether the drivers are interesting in the press conference. This is (or is supposed to be) racing, not Dallas, or Celebrity Big Brother. In the final analysis the more racing costs, the fewer teams and drivers can afford to compete, and the less competitive it becomes. Throw in a lot of downforce and you have all the makings of a boring procession. |
||
|
6 Aug 2007, 19:09 (Ref:1982762) | #47 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 207
|
The F307 is just an updated 305, very slightly.
The 06 update kit consisted of bigger bargeboards and 2 extra boards that go under the front suspension, more like turning vains, and also some 'tusks' that came out from the front corners of the floor, like in F1, to give a type of ground effects by creating an air curtain down the side of the floor. And then in may/june 06, the sidepod chimneys were introduced. O7 package changed the bargeboards again, making them a lot more cut into and bowl like. The turning vains got moved forward and a little wing was bolted inbetween them, under the tub. I've got a feeling the F3 rules state the all 'cars' must be built in the first year, and then can only have spares and updates built for them in the follwing years. So most chassis all go by the F305 number, but if you right your tub off and buy a new one from Dallara, it will have F307 stamped in it. |
|
__________________
David Matthew Neil. |
6 Aug 2007, 19:37 (Ref:1982793) | #48 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 6,704
|
ok thanks for the F307 info. Of course the new cycle starts next year.
Whilst its true that spec chassis racing can be entertaining - a lot of it is deathly dull - GP2 is good but a lot of that is dwn to the fact that they have ground effect floors, something that would improve F1 no end - and the FIA have proposed just that. You mention that spec series cut costs but in the long term they are crippling the motorsport industry, if all the firms are forced out of business then you won't have competition and watch prices rise. Also where do you expect to get the engineers from - the few with multichassis experience will charge huge sums to win, and if you think engineers have no effect in a spec class you are very wrong. Why is it that the same teams carlin etc... always win in spec classes? good engineers. unless the set up of the car is totally fixed, all run by the same team like FPA, you'll never escape the fact that you need multichassis racing. Bear in mind the vast majority of F1 fans say that they are interested in the technology of the cars. Read the pages of Racecar Engineering, theres huge numbers of people from all levels of the sport condemning spec racers |
||
__________________
Chase the horizon |
6 Aug 2007, 20:27 (Ref:1982838) | #49 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 85
|
Quote:
Re the British Engineering industry. I'm very conscious that Britain is at the heart of the motorsport industry. And proud of it. But, in the final analysis, I want to see the best racing - the racing industry should be subservient to racing, not the reverse. True, good engineers are key to success in "one-make" championships. But they are vastly cheaper than windtunnels or one-off suspension set-ups. |
||
|
6 Aug 2007, 20:38 (Ref:1982849) | #50 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,408
|
Quote:
In Europe they tend to go with the original build year of the chassis, but in UK the tendency is to indicate how up-to-date the chassis is, i.e. an F305 updated to to F307 spec will be called an F307, because it's the same as a pukka F307. |
|||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Renault F3 Engine | Monkey Head | National & International Single Seaters | 11 | 12 Mar 2004 10:56 |
Best F3 Engine | Miko | National & International Single Seaters | 11 | 4 Dec 2003 17:16 |
Minardi's engine supply for next year | Yoong Montoya | Formula One | 44 | 9 Sep 2002 05:24 |
Sauber engine for next year... | BD | Formula One | 29 | 8 Apr 2002 07:21 |
What engine will Arrows use next year? | steve nielsen | Formula One | 16 | 1 Jul 2001 17:11 |