|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 Oct 2011, 01:33 (Ref:2974558) | #51 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 781
|
My thoughts:
1. Stop using this to advance agendas. You know who you are. It's completely classless. 2. There are serious injuries at road and street circuits, too. Justin Wilson's out of the season. Did you know Mid-Ohio was a road course? Did you know it was a low-speed incident? Will Power and Nelson Philippe were badly hurt at Infineon of all places. I don't need to tell you about fatalities in 1999 and 1996 in CART, either. You know. 3. The FIA and Formula One safety are overrated. So much is down to chance. There have been so many accidents with the fence in recent times in IndyCar where drivers raced again. Just because Robert Kubica lived at Montréal doesn't mean F1 has perfect safety. After all, four or five drivers who took equally frightening rides in the same accident, or Simona at Indy this year, or Conway before in 2010. They lived and raced again. Does that mean crashing an IndyCar at high-speed into a fence is safe? Fact of the matter is, F1 cars have vulnerabilities. NASCAR vehicles have vulnerabilities. The IndyCar has vulnerabilities. Unfortunately, the perfect scenario for a vulnerability was exploited. We spend too much time in a ****ing match about our favorite series and least favorite series using what accidents looked like to justify the safety of "our" series and talk about how "our" cars would protect in another series' wreck where they didn't, but the fact is, that ignores all the actual math (and reality) behind it... 4. Comments from a lot of people in NASCAR and F1 have been really offensive. Not all; some are very respectful in how they say it. You can have an opinion, but some of the trash is said not as concern, but as "well, my series is better than Indy" and backed up by misinformation, insults, or references to things that happened twenty years ago. So insulting. And that's why the FIA scares me. Some politically motivated people see the FIA as this grand savior who will make IndyCar "sensible." Others don't want them on "our" territory. I'm just afraid their expertise of oval racing might not be very high, their desire to assert themselves in the American racing world be strong, their reaction be over-the-top, and the advice they give be compulsory if IndyCar wants to get their races sanctioned. I'm fine with FIA helping. I just don't want the series to be bound to whatever they come up with. Because, yes, the FIA could actually be wrong. They could be right, too. I just want IndyCar to get a final say in if they are right, wrong, somewhere in between and not be bound to it given FIA's power. 5. I don't think the Dallara is unsafe, personally, and if the new car is even safer, better. I do wonder if pack racing is too high-risk. I don't want personal biases to get in the way, so I'm not going to even try to assess that. Someone else will do it better. 6. I am worried about the rear bumper...I know it will prevent cars from going airborne, but does it create a new problem? It seems to me that if a faster car collides into the back of a slower car the way many did...the energy's still gotta go somewhere. And I worry if the car doesn't go up...the drivers are going to get the worst of that impact. Someone with a better knowledge of this could help, I'm sure, but I just wonder if it creates more problems, or is a trade-off of two problems, or whatever. It's the right intention to stop cars from going into the fences, and they really shouldn't be there because it almost always ends in injury, but I'd hate to see total number of injuries increase even if their severity is lowered. Something should change. But what changes should 1) not be knee-jerking, 2) not prescribed by pretentious "experts," and 3) have everything to do with safety and not "split politics." There should be no blind "ban this, get rid of that, do this, do that, blah blah blah." Look at what you have in tracks, in cars, etc. and find ways to make all of them better in any way before you give up on them. |
|
|
21 Oct 2011, 02:30 (Ref:2974567) | #52 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
Regardless of what some might see as an agenda, now is not the time to say "Well, I think IndyCar is doing alright, safety is improving after all!" I think we've seen enough of this product over the last few years that the IRL chassis that went out of service at the end of the 2011 season was inherently flawed in its design and less-safe than (for example) the Champ Car Lola in that it had a propensity to flip wildly when it got airborne. That has a lot to do with the large relatively flat bottom most definitely added to the problem. Also, yes there were fatalities in CART/Champ Car but I think we can all agree that we there is a certain amount of danger involved in racing. But using that as a defense for keeping the "wheel-to-wheel" racing in the sport is as frustratingly stupid as people trying to advance an agenda. People who tend to be in favor of "wheel-to-wheel" racing also tend to talk endlessly about the “truly knowing/appreciating the history" of open wheel racing. And yet, "wheel-to-wheel" (side-by-side, flat-out, frightening, skill-devoid – not an opinion, and not political) racing doesn't have a history in "Indy"-type racing. If you're going to race on ovals, don't put your drivers in a position where skill is removed and drivers are put in a situation where skill no longer allows them to win nor escape precarious situations, as was demonstrated Sunday. A simple spin that would have ended with bruises and a ruined race car resulted in 15 destroyed race cars and the worst of all possible situations for one driver and his family. The "open-wheel war" is over. Clearly there is still much animosity between the factions, and this will be my only politically motivated thought: If "wheel-to-wheel" racing is what you want, how many more people have to suffer before you learn that IndyCar is not a place for you nor for side-by-side "wheel-to-wheel" racing. Try NASCAR, it's where the rest of the fans went when this damned war started to eat away the sport. For what it's worth, I don't like the FIA. And quite frankly, I don't even see them as an option that will be a "savior" of any sort for IndyCar. There is a frightening void of intelligence in IndyCar management (forget the so-called pretension of some OUTSIDE the decision making circle) at the very least on the racing and safety sides. (And it is possibly worse than a lack of intelligence, but a snubbing of noses to safety and the drivers trying to make a living around Indy. The very root of what is being asked for by most in this forum, and I may be speaking out of turn, is the elimination of a type of racing that has no place in the "history" of the sport, takes no talent, and puts drivers in a dangerous position wherein they have no control over what happens to them. Allowing side-by-side racing is be like mandating suspension failure at 225mph. Suspension failures happen, drivers accept this when they get into the car. Why allow for a formula that puts drivers in such a horrendously dangerous position? On top of that, in the great big packs, not only is one driver in danger, but many, many more are in danger. Full disclosure: I was a Champ Car fan, when I came to racing consciousness CART was the product right in front of my nose, just like how most old-school IRL fans are IRL fans because Indy was the product right in front of their nose. While we may have come to our viewpoints honestly, I think there is a political split, so your point about split politics not influencing driver safety is very true. We can't ignore the danger of two-wide racing any longer. It doesn't belong in IndyCar. Fears over the current accepted style of over racing aren’t political, they come from people who want interesting racing and to cut down on the danger to the drivers we adore!!! Chris |
|||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
21 Oct 2011, 02:40 (Ref:2974569) | #53 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 781
|
I think you misinterpreted my post, which tells me I did a **** job conveying what I was trying to say.
I honestly hate the pack racing. Always hated it. Think it's silly. I'm not trying to defend it. I just don't think the first solution should be get rid of all the tracks or anything harsh like that; that, to me, is a last resort if there is no modification to the cars or the tracks they can realistically make. I agree they need to look at changes. I just don't want to write oval racing off. It's not my cup of tea, but it has a place here, and I think it's a huge knee-jerk to just say "fine, we won't go to ovals." They may phase themselves out if people continue to not go and not watch, though, so it could all be moot. I'm not a wheel-to-wheel guy. Never liked the 1.5 mile tracks, never liked Michigan and Fontana with the IRL package. Hell, I never liked the IRL that much; I, too, came from CART and Champ Car. I'm just trying to give it a fair look. I'm advocating trying to find a way to make racing work at the tracks they have with the cars they will have. And if they can't, fine, don't do it. |
|
|
21 Oct 2011, 03:44 (Ref:2974579) | #54 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
Less eyeballs means less money and the end of IRL-caused tragedies sooner. I hope it doesn't come to that, that the sport can fix itself even with what might be crummy ownership. Chris |
|||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
21 Oct 2011, 05:57 (Ref:2974589) | #55 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 10,043
|
Quote:
Three or four laps before the crash, Ryan Briscoe & Alex Tagliani, two of the most experienced guys in the field, went along the back straight banging and rubbing wheels with neither backing off..... |
|||
__________________
"The Great Race" 22 November 1960 - 21 July 1999 |
21 Oct 2011, 11:06 (Ref:2974675) | #56 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Quote:
What I would emphasise more is the inconsistent application of driving standards from the series organisation and the way that this has created an uncertain atmosphere on the race track with its consequences on driving standards. From month to month they seem to lurch from wildly draconian restrictions on passing to free license to wreck. I noticed both Torpedo Tagliani and Harpoon Helio seem to be affected by a particular wild streak for example. |
|||
|
21 Oct 2011, 11:55 (Ref:2974705) | #57 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
Quote:
hopefully this tragic accident won't set in motion a number of retirements from the old guard and lead to an influx of new drivers of varying standards. |
||
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
21 Oct 2011, 14:15 (Ref:2974752) | #58 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,286
|
It's worth remembering what the drivers themselves were saying about the race. Dario commented that drivers were doing crazy stuff after just 5 laps into the race. If he could see it from the cockpit of a car travelling at 220 why couldn't the stewards of the meeting? Who is the driving standards observer and why isn't dangerous driving penalised with a black flag or a drive through penalty?
There has been some unfair criticism of Indycar drivers - the best are as good as anyone in F1. The trouble is there are a few who aren't up to standard and some who are good but sometimes just don't think. Look at all the nonsense in the pitlane at the Kentucky race. If you can't enter and exit a pit responsibly and without wrecking what are you doing driving a car capable of 230mph? There really needs to be a superlicense system to make sure everyone maintains proper driving standards and to prevent weaker drivers from competing at this level. |
||
|
21 Oct 2011, 17:25 (Ref:2974822) | #59 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,736
|
Quote:
Glad you brought up the subject of technical director, I though that was Tony Cotman's role? All he seems to have become is Dallara's lapdog. |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
21 Oct 2011, 19:18 (Ref:2974873) | #60 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 123
|
http://www.tsn.ca/auto_racing/story/?id=378595
Obviously, we are not the only ones discussing this topic. |
||
|
21 Oct 2011, 20:57 (Ref:2974931) | #61 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,099
|
Quote:
Wow, you can say that again - good to know it is a wide ranging topic of conversation. I am also glad to see there has been a driver meeting called, the silence has been deafening this week... I'd like to be a fly on the wall monday... |
|||
|
22 Oct 2011, 17:58 (Ref:2975192) | #62 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 294
|
JV thoughts on Randy's 5 mill prize
This was posted sometime ago before the actual Las Vegas race took place. Some interesting thoughts from JV. This caught my attention.
Quote:
Article can be found here. http://www.crash.net/indycar/news/17...vegas_bid.html |
|||
__________________
The Best Racing I've Ever Seen IndyCar 1979 - 1995. |
22 Oct 2011, 21:49 (Ref:2975260) | #63 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
22 Oct 2011, 22:46 (Ref:2975278) | #64 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
He wasn't the only person to voice concerns. Quite a few drivers made comments publicly and in private expressing their concerns before the race. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
22 Oct 2011, 23:11 (Ref:2975287) | #65 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 2,025
|
Quote:
How they could look at Kentucky 2011 and say it is better than Michigan 2000 or 1998 or any number of CART oval races is insane. I tried, I really, really tried to support open-wheel but if that is the core of the fanbase I'm out. I don't like to associate myself with bloodthirsty lunatics. Chris |
|||
__________________
Member: Ecurie Llanfairpwllgwyngyllgogerychwyrndrobwllllantysiliogogogoch. EFR & Greg Pickett fan. |
23 Oct 2011, 12:09 (Ref:2975514) | #66 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Quote:
As well as being dangerous, it was an idea that also demeans the sport and its drivers. Whatever you think about the quality of the regular grid, that a old turkey driver can just arrive, beat all the regulars and take the $5 million is as impossible as it openly insulting the sport, imo. It all comes from the folly of appointing an outsider. |
|||
|
23 Oct 2011, 12:27 (Ref:2975518) | #67 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 8,963
|
|||
__________________
Upon entry into the Bathurst 1000, it should be mandatory to view the compelling "Moffat - Man and the Mountain" film |
23 Oct 2011, 23:24 (Ref:2975771) | #68 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,702
|
Quote:
I'm not the most technical guy in the world, so don't really have the expertise to disect the ins and outs of that side of safety, but... There is absolutely no consistent ruling on any aspect of driver standards... And in a series where probably one third of the drivers are inexperienced, or perhaps less talented than they could be, it's a recipe for disaster. At the very least, it is a recipe for embarrassing events like the one we had in Toronto earlier this year. And before people start jumping up and down... I'm not saying this had anything directly to do with the Las Vegas tragedy. However, it creates an environment where drivers are less careful about their actions. It's like a basketball, or soccer game... The first few calls, or non-calls, will let the players know what they can and can't get away with... The inconsistent - and frankly ineffective - officiating of this series has created an atmosphere of, "well, I don't have to be too careful - there's every chance I'll get away with it". I know we are talking about a market where NASCAR is king, drivers are let at it and rubbin' is racin'... But these aren't NASCARS... They are completely different. The Las Vegas event, on a NASCAR track, with a five million dollar incentive, huge field and artificial pack racing had a distinct NASCAR feel to it. I repeat, this isn't NASCAR - and those upon high need to understand that it is a totally different kettle of fish. They need to stop trying to create open wheel NASCAR, because they are playing a very dangerous game if they don't... |
||
|
24 Oct 2011, 22:20 (Ref:2976281) | #69 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 1,965
|
A bit of news from the drivers' meeting today:
http://espn.go.com/racing/indycar/st...afety-concerns |
||
|
24 Oct 2011, 22:24 (Ref:2976285) | #70 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
http://www.gordonkirby.com/categorie..._is_no309.html
Informative piece from people in the know that are not snorting kool aid nose candy. |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
24 Oct 2011, 22:25 (Ref:2976288) | #71 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
24 Oct 2011, 22:26 (Ref:2976289) | #72 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
24 Oct 2011, 22:31 (Ref:2976293) | #73 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Paul Tracy nearly died at Vegas:
http://lockerz.com/s/149142420 http://www.motorsportmagazine.co.uk/...ycar-concerns/ |
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
24 Oct 2011, 23:32 (Ref:2976319) | #74 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,736
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
26 Oct 2011, 01:25 (Ref:2976871) | #75 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 2,311
|
Ashmore lectured on the phone for an hour one day, much of which concerned his insistence that high downforce from ground effects was the way to go for the new formula. Guess not.
My guess was that flat bottom cars with relaxed regulations on selective downforce would prevent flat-out lapping and further create speed differential at various points on the track due to the variation in drag levels. That was two years ago. Mike Cannon has it right. Nobody gives a crap about what they are doing. Until the lack of foresight highlights the stupidity of the entire exercise, that is. |
||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Circuits - Discussion on their safety or otherwise! | Simon Hadfield | Historic Racing Today | 133 | 27 Sep 2009 23:47 |
Safety discussion | werner | Touring Car Racing | 14 | 2 Mar 2008 17:39 |
IRL mandates new safety features | KC | IRL Indycar Series | 1 | 6 Feb 2002 17:10 |