|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
13 Jun 2011, 11:27 (Ref:2897971) | #1751 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 285
|
Yes the Audi was mega on the tires! It was very interesting how this wear advantage to some extend neutralized Peugeots better milleage. I wonder how the R18 can do 3 hours on a set while the R15 struggled to do 1½ hour. Surely the compounds were not much harder this year?
However i do think Audi made a tactical mistake in not changing the tires with 1 or even 1½ hour to go. Now they race 3 hours on one set and ½ hour on another. They should rather have done around 2 hours on each set. It nearly cost them since Lotterer picked up a slow puncture on the old set, but it was close enough to fuel the car to the finish. |
|
|
13 Jun 2011, 21:22 (Ref:2898403) | #1752 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
They probably gave Andre softer tires to give him more grip that last stint, because he pulled away from Pag almost at will by the tune of 1-3 seconds a lap before he settled down to maintaining a gap.
The Audi had better tires at the end, as they were softer and fresher, while Simon had to fight with 3.5 stint old tires. And the R18 doing 5 stints on tires (and the R18's stints were only on average 1 lap less than last year) seems to confirm that the Pugs have a narrow set up window, especially in LM trim, as they seemed to be fairly wild cars to drive on worn tires and in traffic, and hence Audi's speed advantage--it wasn't so much that the Pug was slower over a clean lap on equal tires, as the times typically were competitive though out much of the race--but the Audi was more consistant and it may be the fact that the R18 ran a bit more downforce than the Pugs that helped their handling and to get the most out of their tires. I wonder how this will play out in the remaining ILMC events, as the R18 has often been faster at the shorter tracks, too, and the Peugeot's slight straight line speed advantage doesn't mean as much as it did at LM. |
||
|
14 Jun 2011, 03:35 (Ref:2898541) | #1753 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
http://a.yfrog.com/img736/2875/wopv.jpg
Picture of the #1 car after its crash... that car is officially history. |
||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
14 Jun 2011, 08:03 (Ref:2898606) | #1754 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,129
|
Just for my information, which shorter tracks are you referring to? (The R18 so far has raced at Spa and Le Mans)
|
||
__________________
pieter melissen |
14 Jun 2011, 08:17 (Ref:2898618) | #1755 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,623
|
Quote:
|
||
|
14 Jun 2011, 08:19 (Ref:2898620) | #1756 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
Uh... what rear end? Everything except the tub is pretty much mangled beyond recognition.
|
||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
14 Jun 2011, 08:21 (Ref:2898621) | #1757 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,129
|
and yet I would not be surprised if this tub can still be used. These things are so strong, and the breaking off of all the attached parts only helped to absorb the energy of the crash. If they will use it again, Audi will surely tell everybody, to prove the point of its strength.
|
||
__________________
pieter melissen |
14 Jun 2011, 08:23 (Ref:2898622) | #1758 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
The RCE article on the Audi R18 is available on http://www.racecar-engineering.com/a...-le-mans-2011/
One of the reasons why Audi chose the V6 layout is that they expect the ACO to restrict the performance of diesel engines during the lifetime of the R18. That was also one of the reasons why they went from V12 to V10 with the R15. |
|
|
14 Jun 2011, 08:27 (Ref:2898626) | #1759 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,623
|
The Allan Mcnish crash is pretty telling. The engine bay area is still intact and you can see everything thats going on. Theres one really good picture of the allan mcnish crash. ill post it when i find it
|
|
|
14 Jun 2011, 08:30 (Ref:2898627) | #1760 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
The complete rear end of the R18 has already been exposed in http://www.mulsannescorner.com/RCELeMans2011.html
|
|
|
14 Jun 2011, 11:38 (Ref:2898749) | #1761 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 58
|
Audi has won twice at LM 2011 imo, the race and the competition for the safest car. There have never been such dreadful accidents without serious consequences and I cannot tell how relieved I was as both drivers walked away!! Afterwards, there was a discussion on Eurosport about the car concept and they were agreeing that the coupe concept has contributed very much to drivers safety: Allans R 18 was bouncing on the top of the barrier headlong, before it took a header. So the roof was protecting him very much from the impact and the debris flying all over the place and it was similar at Mikes accident. Also the fact that an integral chassis with bodywork and roof (which was manufactured as a unity) has much more rigidity to offer may have contributed to that. So the comparison between open and closed concept was all about aerodynamics and strategy up to now but I think there is also a big safety issue to ponder about.
|
|
|
14 Jun 2011, 11:56 (Ref:2898770) | #1762 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,129
|
|||
__________________
pieter melissen |
14 Jun 2011, 12:14 (Ref:2898786) | #1763 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 58
|
For gods sake they didn´t but the Audi R 18 seems bullet proof to me. It´s a tank!
|
|
|
14 Jun 2011, 12:20 (Ref:2898792) | #1764 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
From the Audi Sport twitter:
Quote:
|
||
|
14 Jun 2011, 12:30 (Ref:2898798) | #1765 | ||
Race Official
1% Club
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 47,177
|
|||
__________________
Go woke, Go broke… Here’s hoping a random universe works out in your favour… The meaning of life… ENJOYING THE PASSAGE OF TIME! #CANCERSUCKS |
14 Jun 2011, 12:44 (Ref:2898807) | #1766 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,129
|
|||
__________________
pieter melissen |
14 Jun 2011, 19:06 (Ref:2899008) | #1767 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
Quote:
And from the photos and reports I've seen and heard, the tubs were pretty much untouched in those accidents as far as major damage. And as for the smaller tracks, places like Imola, Silverstone, Road Atlanta and Zhuhai place a larger emphasis on handling, grip, and braking. Audi had those advantages over the Pug at Le Mans, as sector times namely in the Porsche Curves will show (R18s also had the fastest first sector times as well). The Pug only had the advantage in sector 2, which is where all the straights are, and Peugeot's speed advantage there certainly isn't the nearly 10mph that they had over Audi in past years; it's now more like 3-4 mph, and down a straight as long as the Mulsanne sections are, that won't equate to much at most other tracks. It seems that when the cars are in identical aero trim, the Audi has a bit more lap time in it. Not to mention that Audi did a couple of 5 stint tire runs and seemed to be usually more consistant in their lap times during the whole of the race. Last edited by chernaudi; 14 Jun 2011 at 19:13. |
|||
|
14 Jun 2011, 19:17 (Ref:2899021) | #1768 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 209
|
from this article
http://www.quattroruote.it/notizie/s...citori-e-vinti tréluyer Finally, spend a word of thanks 'for Marco Bonanomi', the young Italian driver joined the team of Audi, underlining 'he gave a great help' from what I read, he made 10 laps at le mans test, do you know he was more involved in the r18's development? |
|
|
14 Jun 2011, 20:19 (Ref:2899062) | #1769 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
This had a number of consequences: + faster in Porsche curves + better in traffic when driving of the racing line + less tyre wear - lower top speed - higher fuel consumption |
||
|
14 Jun 2011, 20:21 (Ref:2899064) | #1770 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 2,129
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
pieter melissen |
14 Jun 2011, 20:24 (Ref:2899065) | #1771 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
Kristensen mentioned on the Radio Le Mans that he was the chauffeur on the #3 car. He compared him a lot with Capello: Italian, distracted while driving them to the track, he puts the radio as loud as Dindo, ... |
||
|
14 Jun 2011, 20:47 (Ref:2899073) | #1772 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
As I said some time ago, if Dindo retires, they still need to keep a certain quota of general Italian-ness in the team.
|
||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
14 Jun 2011, 21:05 (Ref:2899077) | #1773 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
Quote:
Audi ran more downforce at LM, and when the cars are in the same spec (LM bodywork), the R18 has more downforce for similar drag numbers, as the R18's weren't that much slower down the straights than the 908s--Fassler drafted Davidson and got right up on his tail when Fassler forced Ant into that mistake at the first Chicane. Straightline speed, oddly, doesn't seem to mean as much under the new regs as it did up through last year. There were three things that Audi had this year that they didn't last year: The R18 is a closed car, they don't seem to have the horsepower gap to Peugeot that they had the last several years, and the R18 was designed like the R8, to be a car that can be raced anywhere with fairly minor changes and isn't the compormised car that the R15 was in both of it's major versions. And all of Peugeot's attempts to reduce drag--including basically mounting their second wing element upside down on their cars--didn't gain them much, only about 3-4 mph down the straights, but it cost them big with tire wear and handling, as they lost a lot of time in traffic and even if they could go 12 laps vs 11, the speed differential was too great. In fact, things could've been worse for Peugeot, as Audi revealed that the #2 Audi had a fuel pick up issue that kept them from using a full tank, which probably--if true--goes some way to explaining the 1 lap gap on stints. After all, on one of his stint on the damp track, Lotterer ran 12 laps, and the Pugs, with the reduced pace, could only muster and equal 12 laps. So Audi probably wasn't that far off from doing 12 lap stints, but they'd have to have slowed down to Peugeot pace to do them. It perplexes me that with the reduced power that everyone would be taking drag off their cars (which is logical), but it seems that the gains by doing so, even at Le Mans, were of minimal effect, and may've done more harm than good in the end. |
|||
|
14 Jun 2011, 22:21 (Ref:2899111) | #1774 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
You seem to believe that the fact that Peugeot could only quadrupple stint the soft compound is solely caused by less downforce. There are probably a lot of contributing factors: aero, balance, suspension set up, ... Remember that Peugeot and Audi had slightly different tyres (construction, compound). So Peugeot maybe did no have the best tyre for the track condition. Quote:
Also note that the other 2 Audis could not do 12 lap stints either. |
|||
|
14 Jun 2011, 23:04 (Ref:2899137) | #1775 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
The other two also DNF'd long before the wet weather came late.
And in '03, Bentley couldn't use their full 90 liters either, and that was ID'd as a fuel pickup issue. Also why could Audi only be assured of running 11 laps at LM, while Peugeot and Audi had similar stint times at Spa? Different setups, or is it mainly down to percentages of time at full throttle between LM and other tracks? |
||
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] Porsche GTP / Hypercar: factory and customer | Simmi | North American Racing | 9284 | 18 Sep 2024 14:24 |
[WEC] Toyota LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | ACO Regulated Series | 6771 | 18 Aug 2020 09:37 |
Nissan LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5568 | 17 Feb 2016 23:22 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |
[LM24 Race] Audi LMP1 Poster all art deco'd. | blackohio | ACO Regulated Series | 2 | 27 Oct 2011 06:30 |