|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
22 Jan 2005, 15:08 (Ref:1207158) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 963
|
The real effect of higher vs. lower octane fuel
here we only have 2 types of gasoline. 86 octane and 91 octane referred to as Regular and Premium respectively. Now, from what I understand as the air-fuel mix is compressed it increases it's temperature and therefore the temperature could be so high as to light up the mix before the spak plug. Higher octane would give a higher resistance to temperature and therefore avoid this problem. This should be, from what I understand, the reason why cars with higher compression ratios need higher octane fuel. Likewise cars at higher altitudes (like the city where I live which is at 2600 meters above sea level or 8500ft) would need lower octane as there's less air, therefore less pressure as it's compressed and less temperature (PV=nRT).
Anyway, my car has a compression ratio of 9.1:1. Theoretically it would need Premium at sea level but I was told that at this altitude I could use regular and I have done so always. Likewise with my dad's car which has a ratio of 9:1. However, I was told that cars with compression ratios above 9.5:1 need premium even at this altitude. But a friend at work who had a car with a compression ratio of 10:1 used regular even at sea level and he said he didn't have any problems with the car. But my question is, what are the risks of running a car with a lower octane fuel than the one thet is recommended? |
||
__________________
In the long run, we're all dead. Keynes |
22 Jan 2005, 16:38 (Ref:1207205) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 2,540
|
If the car does not ping (fuel ignite prematurely as described above) it should be ok. It sounds like a light rattle under accelleration.
|
||
|
23 Jan 2005, 00:09 (Ref:1207496) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 520
|
the higher the octane the more ignition timing you can run and more power is produced
|
||
|
23 Jan 2005, 01:26 (Ref:1207532) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 2,188
|
In the near future there will be no need to worry, direct fuel injection mean zero pre det with whatever fuel at whatever atmos conditions.
|
||
__________________
A Saudi saying, "My father rode a camel. I drive a car. My son flies a jet-plane. His son will ride a camel." |
23 Jan 2005, 15:31 (Ref:1207931) | #5 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 963
|
This ping is like a metallic rattle right? I wasn't sure how it's called in english. I sometimes hear that sound in my car, particularly when going up a steep hill. But the use of premium do9esn't always reduce it.
But what could be the damage caused to the engine caused by the use of lower octane fuel? |
||
__________________
In the long run, we're all dead. Keynes |
23 Jan 2005, 19:47 (Ref:1208094) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,525
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
There are 10 types of people in this world... those who understand binary, and those who don't. |
24 Jan 2005, 08:01 (Ref:1208364) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 520
|
if it is pinking you are risking serious engine damage
eg holed piston in a bad case |
||
|
24 Jan 2005, 08:48 (Ref:1208388) | #8 | |
Rookie
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 23
|
Sharky,
I can get 95 octane here. |
|
|
24 Jan 2005, 16:33 (Ref:1208667) | #9 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 1999
Posts: 3,797
|
I used to have a Rover 3500 V8 which in manufactured form required 105 octane. I had to retard the timing massively to get it to run cleanly on four-star. The thought of what the pinking was doing to that lovely aluminium engine was too much to bear.
|
||
|
24 Jan 2005, 17:51 (Ref:1208744) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2000
Posts: 963
|
I see. It's a real shame that the government hasn't allowed for the sale of higher octane fuel here although i would think that at the current prices nobody would buy it anyway.
105 octane. Damn!!! What about all those octane boosters on the market? Are they any good? I wouldn't think so but I've never tried them |
||
__________________
In the long run, we're all dead. Keynes |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Octane booster | breezeblock | Racing Technology | 20 | 12 Aug 2006 13:14 |
Octane magazine | SL | Motorsport History | 5 | 18 May 2003 22:38 |
Which do you rate higher - Suzuka 1994 or Nurburgring 1995 | Yoong Montoya | Formula One | 16 | 13 Apr 2003 12:59 |
Higher wing did'nt mak F1 slower, explanation by an expert...... | steve nielsen | Formula One | 1 | 31 Mar 2001 02:56 |