|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
21 Apr 2018, 09:34 (Ref:3816762) | #1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
<sigh>
Lower costs, more entrants, more competition. But that's a concept too hard to grasp. |
|
|
21 Apr 2018, 10:02 (Ref:3816768) | #2 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,723
|
Quote:
I grasp the cost cutting concept you mention but it is still aiming at dumber slower cars. |
|||
__________________
Geting old is mandatory, acting old is optional. |
21 Apr 2018, 11:52 (Ref:3816786) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 7,979
|
Quote:
Longer braking distances through perhaps steel brake discs, a vast reduction in wake turbulence possibly through a greater use of ground effect, etc. ... Having the cars designed AROUND the safety device, instead of plopping something on the existing designs like they have stubbornly done in the past. There are a multitude of ways to improve the sport, but the only thing truly needed is that whoever is making those decisions decides to grow a pair and stand up to manufacturer extortion. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[Rules] Are more rule changes necessary ? | Marbot | Formula One | 51 | 27 Sep 2009 17:19 |
F1 future rule changes | TheNewBob | Formula One | 57 | 20 Dec 2006 09:19 |
Sensible ideas for future technical regs anyone?/Rule changes - more to come [merged] | AMT | Formula One | 74 | 12 Nov 2002 16:09 |
Future Tourer Future | Crash Test | Australasian Touring Cars. | 13 | 17 Jul 2002 23:01 |