|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Feb 2012, 12:27 (Ref:3024068) | #2576 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
It will be a tough for Ullrich to choose between Treluyer and Fassler.
In the interview Treluyer gives some personal comments on the TS030. He stresses that the main cause of visibility problems is not the shape of the cockpit but the big front wheels. |
|
|
10 Feb 2012, 15:17 (Ref:3024131) | #2577 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
Quote:
Just sounds like PR and trying to contain the situation caused by someone possibly making a mistake during the car's design phase. |
|||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
10 Feb 2012, 15:24 (Ref:3024133) | #2578 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
Wouldn't the redesigned windshield and the other parts bear witness to that. Basically a mea culpa by Audi without saying so in my view.
|
||
|
10 Feb 2012, 15:26 (Ref:3024134) | #2579 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
|
Quote:
I was in their pits during PLM and was constantly watching the onboard camera for the number 2 car. The visibility looking forward and to the left did not seem that bad, but looking to the right was horrible |
|||
|
10 Feb 2012, 16:02 (Ref:3024143) | #2580 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Yet still Treluyer believes that front tyres are bit contributing factor. So visibility probably has not improved that much with the new windshield.
|
|
|
10 Feb 2012, 16:06 (Ref:3024145) | #2581 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
|
|||
|
10 Feb 2012, 19:36 (Ref:3024224) | #2582 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 1,109
|
I am cheering for Audi now when I used to hate them. The R18 is the reason for this. I never have liked open topped cars, but when Audi went to the Coupe, I was very happy and the R18 is pretty good looking machine I think.
|
|
|
10 Feb 2012, 21:35 (Ref:3024300) | #2583 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,559
|
I don't see how he could comment on the visibility of the Toyota if he hasn't driven it. How far back the drivers sit looks like it'll solve the issue, also they're LHD instead of being on the right. That'll surely help since most tracks are clockwise.
|
|
|
10 Feb 2012, 23:54 (Ref:3024355) | #2584 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
The point I was trying to make, is that the revised R18 will probably still have poor visibility because of the big front tyres and the driver position.
|
|
|
11 Feb 2012, 07:37 (Ref:3024454) | #2585 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
How would LHD and RHD mean anything since the drivers sit just immediately opposite the center-line of the car? I don't see much difference there.
I've seen the Toyota onboards, and I don't know if it's the camera or not, but it does seem that the windsheild has some areas of distortion on it, though it can be the camera distorting the image because I don't think that the cockpit air intake hoses are supposed to be wavy/distorted in some areas. The Toyota, like the Audi, run the wider front tires, but like the 908, lacks the extreme fender bulges that the R18 runs. But we have to remember that guys like Ben, Andre, and Marcel are all over 6'0", while Allan and Tom are the shortest guys on the Audi squad now as far as regular drivers. I don't think it's a coincidence that they had the most incidents last year until finally at Zhuhai Audi made changes to the cockpit arrangements of the R18 (per TK's comments following PLM where he admitted that there were issues with visibility and that Audi were trying something). Maybe Toyota got a coup when they got Alex Wurz, probably the tallest driver in sportscar racing today. But Audi's big issue with Allan and Tom seemed to be that the R18 favored taller drivers who had a much easier time looking over the front fenders. Also, the R18's relative lack of top speed was an issue to, and they had to maximize cornering speeds and cutting though traffic to gain and edge on the 908 last year. But it's still easier to pass down the straights than in corners, so I hope that Audi have improved the R18 from that respect, too. And I'm curious about Audi running the old R18s at Sebring instead of running the R18H tubs without the hybrid systems on the cars, which will likely happen with the non-hybrid cars at Spa and LM. I know that they'll probably test the newer cars at Sebring after the race, but why not get some more race miles on the new tubs/bodywork/front suspension? I know that as long as Audi keep out of trouble at Sebring that they very well might have it locked up, but with the old R18, that was often the problem. |
||
|
11 Feb 2012, 08:35 (Ref:3024475) | #2586 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,559
|
Is it confirmed they're using the 2011 R18's? I thought they had to change the car's bodywork anyway to conform to the rules with the fender holes? It'd make sense that Audi would run 2012 non-hybrid R18's at Sebring. Unless they can get away with not having holes. But seeing as how the HPD has them, I doubt it.
|
|
|
11 Feb 2012, 08:46 (Ref:3024477) | #2587 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,270
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
When in doubt? C4. |
11 Feb 2012, 09:16 (Ref:3024486) | #2588 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
The ACO will allow teams to run Sebring without the holes, reportedly with a slight weight penalty due to BoP, but it's only a one race waiver.
The main issue I'm asking about is will the R18's at Sebring be last year's unmodifed cars, '11 R18's fitted with the '12 bodywork, or the '12 R18s using the R18H tubs with the new bodywork/front suspension, but simply lacking the hybrid systems. And I'd like to know where the rumors of the R18H when hybrid equipped being faster than the old R18. It very well may be, but if the new front suspension guarentees more grip and better handling, that will (at least in theory) automatically make the new car faster, as would an improved aero package. I have no doubt that it will be faster simply though development, but Ben's comments say that he's been happy with the non-hybrid R18s so far in testing (non-hybrid 2012 R18 or the '11 R18 it didn't say in that article), but he does say that if the R18H is faster, he'll go for that. C'mon, he's a racing driver for god's sake--faster is better to these guys! But we have to remember what drivers said of the 908HY-4 last year--it had different handling characteristics because of weight shift, but it seemed to be faster overall. I wonder if Audi will run whatever they have in a packaging similar to the Toyota, which seems to be a logical way of doing it to keep the weight centered in the car and for ease of maintenance. |
||
|
11 Feb 2012, 15:22 (Ref:3024558) | #2589 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
Too late to edit my last comment, but Dagys at Speed confirms that both Audi and Pescarolo will run 2011 spec cars. It confirms that there will be a slight weight penalty--15kgs to be exact--due to BoP requirements for not having the 2012 aero bits on the cars.
Audi has also confirmed that three R18s will be entered, with driver lineups to be announced later, probably at the R18H launch later this month. Of course, will Audi run a hybrid LM/sprint bodywork package, or stick with the sprint package? It doesn't make sense to deviate from the sprint bodywork, since it's Sebring, but the LM bodywork or sprint/LM patchwork bodykit might be more like the R18H. |
||
|
11 Feb 2012, 18:17 (Ref:3024590) | #2590 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
12 Feb 2012, 03:30 (Ref:3024705) | #2591 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
I'd hope for the LM bodywork with the sprint wing and twin front dive planes, but if Audi didn't do that last year outside of LM practice, I can't really see them doing that now.
This will probably be the last race for the "old" R18, as I'd expect even the non-hybrid R18s from after Sebring to use the new tubs. For that reason, I don't see Audi doing anything radically different with the bodywork unless it's R&D for the new cars, and a while back it was reported by someone at Audi that they sort of dropped the ball with the "sprint" bodywork as it was too draggy for what they were aiming for because of its hurried development after focusing so much on the LM stuff. So Audi could be doing nothing, or maybe something to make their cars more similar to the newer car's aero, though not exactly the same. |
||
|
12 Feb 2012, 10:35 (Ref:3024818) | #2592 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,044
|
Have they confirmed whether they will be bringing a Hybrid over in the truck to do some back-to-back testing after the race?
|
|
|
12 Feb 2012, 23:26 (Ref:3025022) | #2593 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,102
|
||
|
13 Feb 2012, 00:12 (Ref:3025042) | #2594 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
|
According to Dagys' Twitter:
Quote:
|
||
|
15 Feb 2012, 08:44 (Ref:3026038) | #2595 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
John also tweeted:
Quote:
|
||
|
15 Feb 2012, 10:57 (Ref:3026085) | #2596 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 2,348
|
edit: nvm
|
|
|
15 Feb 2012, 11:13 (Ref:3026095) | #2597 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
|
Quote:
If Duval has made sure that it only involves Super GT races, and that all other dates he will be free to race what he wants (except Super GT rivals) then he would be free to race for Audi at Le Mans. |
|||
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) |
15 Feb 2012, 16:55 (Ref:3026211) | #2598 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 575
|
Quote:
|
||
|
15 Feb 2012, 18:24 (Ref:3026253) | #2599 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
The situation is completely different now that Toyota is competing in LMP1 on its own. It does not make sense to lend a factory driver to your direct competitor. Too many conflicting situations can occur: Duval collides with one of the Toyota cars, Duval is asked by Audi to block a Toyota car, good driving stints from Duval take away a podium position and WEC points from Toyota, ...
|
|
|
15 Feb 2012, 19:52 (Ref:3026294) | #2600 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 396
|
Quote:
yeah this is too right. to be honest Lotterer might even be in a Toyota Next season or might be fully released from his Toyota Contract because the same thing might happen this year. I doubt toyota wants to risk something like this so when they bring the third car next year im sure lotterer and Douval might endup at toyota it makes no sense to put them elsewhere |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] Porsche Prototype Discussion | Simmi | North American Racing | 9284 | 18 Sep 2024 14:24 |
[WEC] Toyota LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | ACO Regulated Series | 6771 | 18 Aug 2020 09:37 |
Nissan LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5568 | 17 Feb 2016 23:22 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |
[LM24 Race] Audi LMP1 Poster all art deco'd. | blackohio | ACO Regulated Series | 2 | 27 Oct 2011 06:30 |