|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
7 Sep 2008, 20:21 (Ref:2283967) | #251 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
Quote:
Just my opinion, of course. |
|||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:21 (Ref:2283968) | #252 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 478
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:22 (Ref:2283969) | #253 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 3,069
|
KR took the line entitled on the right hander.
LH was quicker and should have won, but he only passed at La Source then as he was much closer to KR than he would have been had he followed him through the Bus Stop. He took an advantage. He should, and probably would, have passed KR anyway in another lap or so and would have deserved what was a fantastic win. |
||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:23 (Ref:2283970) | #254 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,303
|
Quote:
Hasnt been sport for years.......... |
|||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:34 (Ref:2283983) | #255 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 92
|
Quote:
You know, the one where he swerved across the front of Lewis into the braking zone at La Source. |
|||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:35 (Ref:2283984) | #256 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Very disappointing call. I've grown more and more disillusioned with F1 and the FIA's brutal calls. I've missed a few races this year, first time really since the 70's... I make a point to watch Spa, and the FIA pulls a stunt like this. This is becoming a farce and quite unbearable.
|
||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:35 (Ref:2283985) | #257 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,456
|
As much as I don't want Lewis Hamilton to run away with the Drivers' Championship, the penalty called against him was a complete joke. Whether or not he cut through the chicane or Kimi Raikkonen forced him off the track, the results of Lewis' excursion clearly had no significant effect on the action on the battle for position. If he immediately pulled out to a three-second lead over Kimi once he made it past, it would have warranted a penalty. That wasn't the case, Raikkonen had the better car today, and he was ready to reclaim the lead as soon as it was taken away from him.
If one follows the letter of the rule, then perhaps Hamilton was guilty of something. If this incident happened earlier in the race, the stewards would have likely told Hamilton to satisfactorily cede the place or incur a drive-through penalty. Due to the limited number of laps remaining and the fact that the affected party retired from the race shortly afterward, that option was not available. The punishment should fit the crime, but in this case it clearly doesn't. Being docked the equivalent of a drive-through penalty, and handing over the victory to a driver that was not in a position to win, for an incident that had no bearing on the final outcome is absolutely ridiculous. Not only does McLaren need to protest the results, but the rest of the teams (Ferrari excepted, obviously) must come out in objection of having the outcome of the race and championship be decided off the racetrack. |
||
__________________
"There are some players who have psychologists, sportologists. I smoke." --golfer Angel Cabrera, when asked how he kept his composure whilst winning the 2007 U.S. Open, beating Tiger Woods by one stroke. |
7 Sep 2008, 20:40 (Ref:2283989) | #258 | |
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 162
|
Not read all the posts thoroughly so sorry if already said but -
The actual penalty concerns me - cannot see why should be just deducting a time - Firstly can you just guess at what time LH would have been lost? Secondly if you impose such a penalty after the race has finished you surely must assume the offender would be able to carry out the penalty? So - if LH had gone into pits on last lap, to carry out penalty, would Massa (14.461 secs behind) have crossed the finish line before LH had done so in the pits (remember Senna's win) but before Heidfield (23.844 behind LH) - if Massa would have crossed the line then race over - LH could really be second? Not that I think there should be a penalty anyhow |
|
__________________
Malcolm |
7 Sep 2008, 20:43 (Ref:2283990) | #259 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 682
|
I think that today's events were mainly due to the rules being poorly written in this area. I don't know what to think about the FIA stewards decision, as I think they were wrong, but I can see why they did it.
Looking at the rules, they don't make it clear how far you should fall back from the car you passed off the track. You can argue what happened either way, yes, Lewis did fall back, but, was it far enough? Did he manege to use Kimi's slipstream? If he hadn't of cut the corner, would he have got past Kimi there? Then there is the punishment, was it too harsh? Were the FIA just giving the same punishment they normally give for these incidents and should they have given a 10 place grid penalty instead? Would that have looked even more circumspect with Monza up next? As I said at the top of the post, I think the FIA's decision was wrong. I think for the sake of the sport, they should have not punished him. The case for a punishment was marginal at best. What is needed now is clarification in the rules and McLaren's appeal to be successful. I think one of the reason's why this has created so much response and upset is because it was a bloody good race, up until Hamilton's drive became pointless. Last edited by the sniper; 7 Sep 2008 at 20:47. |
||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:43 (Ref:2283991) | #260 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 3,809
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Birmingham City FC. Founded 1875. League Cup Winners 2011. |
7 Sep 2008, 20:43 (Ref:2283994) | #261 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 11
|
I feel that Hamilton indeed had an advantage by cutting the corner, by letting Kimi pass just barely and overtake him right after. When i saw the incident while it occured I found it a grey area thing. I think he should have waited till after the la source hairpin. The point is I think that he would have had no chance of catching Kimi in the first corner if he hadn't cut the corner. The thing is that he let Kimi pass by such a small margin that he enjoyed an advantage by doing so.
Also, I'd like to add that as Kimi crashed, and in the end the incident didn't affect the results, I still don't think that is enough reason to let it pass. It is pretty much irrelevant whether or not it affected the results, if the stewards think he had an advantage in the whole incident, Hamilton should be punished. But not in this fashion. Yes, I think Hamilton was wrong (many of you may not agree on this part already) but what's more important is that it's just a small incident. A fine would and a warning have sufficed. They should have taken him apart and say: "Next time give the position back in a less half-hearted way," have McLaren pay such and such amount and be gone with it. So while I agree that Hamilton is being punished, the 25-second penalty is gigantically out of proportion. The thing that bothers me most though is the fact that after such a great climax to a race in which two drivers really made the Formule One-show shine in a way it seldom does, the FIA should have recognized it's these races that make fans sit on the edge of their chairs, shout at the screen, and feel the blood pumping in their veins. The last three laps of this Grand Prix is the very reason we all love Formula One, Hamilton-fans and non-fans alike. And the FIA should, whilst not letting the issue pass unquestioned, leave the results alone and be glad there are still drivers who race to win and to win only. Last edited by Force_Majeure; 7 Sep 2008 at 20:48. |
||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:43 (Ref:2283995) | #262 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,516
|
Quote:
Also, Schumacher broke a track rod later in the race and finished 8th therefore meaning there wasn't any realistic reason to punish an action that had already been punished (by him damaging his own car only a few laps later). So really in the long run he gained no advantage and could have well been punished for it after the race if he had finished infront of de la Rosa. |
|||
__________________
my pen will not write on the screen |
7 Sep 2008, 20:45 (Ref:2283999) | #263 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 58
|
This decision was ridiculous and is only adding to a season of inconsistent penalties from the F1 stewards (and where Ferrari have been involved, they've got away with all of them - hmmm, that's odd isn't it?).
From what I saw of the overtaking at the chicane, Lewis was ahead at the entry, but Kimi was still alongside and took the normal lines through the chicane, so Lewis had to take avoiding action and as a result cut the corner. Lewis handed back the advantage he had gained by letting Kimi past and then overtook successfully into the first corner - with the help of a slipstream and some outbraking, regardless of the fact that he had already slowed to let Kimi past! This isn't Formula 1, this isn't even sport - this is turning into the motor racing equivalent of professional wrestling. I think the best way of watching the Italian Grand Prix next week is simply turning on the news at around 5pm and see who's really won (and I bet it's a Ferrari!). |
||
__________________
Rush hour - the time of the day when everything is almost at a complete standstill... |
7 Sep 2008, 20:50 (Ref:2284004) | #264 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 107
|
Typical (we love hamilton response) grow up.
|
||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:54 (Ref:2284007) | #265 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 218
|
Quote:
|
||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:56 (Ref:2284010) | #266 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 2,135
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
7 Sep 2008, 20:57 (Ref:2284011) | #267 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 473
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"I didn't even know girls gave signs. They could have had an illuminated badge that said 'Free Sex Right Now, Just Ask!' and I'd have said 'Wow, where'd you get that badge?'" Perry McCarthy |
7 Sep 2008, 20:57 (Ref:2284012) | #268 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
The teams should do something about it, when the achievements in a race must be "official" by off-track decisions. It's like in a football match, a goal being nulled after the match is over, following a late decision from the referees. Basically, if he crossed the line under the chequered flag and went to podium declared as the winner, that shouldn't be removed. A punishment for the next race would be more appropriate.
|
||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
7 Sep 2008, 21:01 (Ref:2284014) | #269 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 58
|
Quote:
For your info, I've been a motor racing marshal for 18 years - including marshalling at the British Grand Prix. I'm not a Hamilton lover - I like drivers with talent - which certainly includes Hamilton, but also includes ones such as Raikonnen, Kubica, Webber, Senna, Prost, Moss, Fangio, Clark, Stewart, Lauda, Jacques Villeneuve, Schumacher, etc. The point is that this decision was out of context with the race and I think this thread shows that. Remember everyone can have their own opinion and I don't think that sort of comment is a useful addition to any debate. |
|||
__________________
Rush hour - the time of the day when everything is almost at a complete standstill... |
7 Sep 2008, 21:02 (Ref:2284016) | #270 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 218
|
Quote:
However, in this specific circumstance, Hamilton appears to have followed the letter of the law by yielding his position fully. Last edited by ukaskew; 7 Sep 2008 at 21:07. |
||
|
7 Sep 2008, 21:03 (Ref:2284018) | #271 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,516
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
my pen will not write on the screen |
7 Sep 2008, 21:05 (Ref:2284019) | #272 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1
|
Shocking , I agree with the others. It gets no better you knew what was coming a farce. As for typical Hamilton fan bull it happens to often now!
|
|
|
7 Sep 2008, 21:08 (Ref:2284025) | #273 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 249
|
A disgrace! FIA and stewards should all resign as of today!
petitiononline.com/mod_perl/signed.cgi?belgp08 Sorry, but the FIA need to here what the fans feel |
||
|
7 Sep 2008, 21:08 (Ref:2284026) | #274 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 92
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
7 Sep 2008, 21:13 (Ref:2284030) | #275 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 2,938
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
My Auntie has been ill or so long we now call her, "I can't believe she's not better". |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Taku's penalty for France - fair or not? | Mr V | Formula One | 74 | 22 Jun 2007 08:43 |
Massa engine penalty | Marbot | Formula One | 20 | 30 Sep 2006 07:38 |
Massa recieves penalty! | steve nielsen | Formula One | 11 | 18 Sep 2002 03:44 |
Massa first to be hit with '10 place penalty' following De la Rosa Incident | Damon | Formula One | 3 | 17 Sep 2002 11:41 |