|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 Dec 2015, 14:43 (Ref:3599194) | #3551 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,896
|
Everyone is spending money on a car they already have, which is a lot less money than a car they have to acquire.
It'd be nice if for some reason the HPD was raced, but for me it's sad to watch. I've kinda lost hope for HPDs after the last Highcroft P1 did so well at Sebring and was immediately shelved for various reasons in North America. |
||
|
21 Dec 2015, 19:22 (Ref:3599253) | #3552 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
21 Dec 2015, 22:35 (Ref:3599296) | #3553 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
He wasn't talking about the ARX-02 but the amazing ARX-01e that showed up only at Sebring 2011 and beat everyone except the Oreca Peugeot. Afterwards Highcroft collapsed. That was the last truly great HPD
Alright yeah you've had some P2 champs since then with 03 and whatever, but that's freezed proam costcap racing for you, and the champ winning 03 LMP1 cars competed mostly against low and poor grids. Though they gave Rebellion nice fights. |
|
|
22 Dec 2015, 09:58 (Ref:3599397) | #3554 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 509
|
Acura/HPD's future plans
I was told strakka spent a serious serious amount on the dome, thought they were developing it to run in P1-L?
|
||
|
22 Dec 2015, 17:22 (Ref:3599471) | #3555 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 1,465
|
They wanted to use it as a test mule to develop a new LMP1 car for 2017, but apparently they put that program on hold due to huge gap between privateers and factories.
|
|
|
22 Dec 2015, 22:49 (Ref:3599553) | #3556 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
On hold = pretty much killed off
|
|
|
22 Dec 2015, 23:49 (Ref:3599569) | #3557 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Some really baffling comments
http://www.racer.com/imsa/item/12472...-participation Not only the "-- I understand Riley is doing a brand new car" (umm no **** Sherlock) and some others, but also the apparent sudden praise towards the new spec regulations we haven't heard before. And thus the doom of their car and all... |
|
|
23 Dec 2015, 00:43 (Ref:3599575) | #3558 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
23 Dec 2015, 04:58 (Ref:3599589) | #3559 | |
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 135
|
Other than Europe,I bet there will be no Oreca P2 bought.
The 2017 P2 is just a disaster waiting to happen!!! Are all the chassis going to be ready day one? At the moment no. |
|
|
23 Dec 2015, 10:12 (Ref:3599630) | #3560 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
What's stopping HPD running the car in one race or Roar before the 24 to show off any improvements-money aside?
|
||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
23 Dec 2015, 11:14 (Ref:3599639) | #3561 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
There is still A possible sale in the works for an IMSA team. Don't expect to see it this year, though.
Quote:
The engines? There's the real question. With all the outrage the final specs keep getting delayed which is only going to make it more difficult. With the engine debacle WEC and ELMS will likely be relying VERY heavily on grandfathered machinery in 2017. IMSA has the benefit of it's own engine package to get around that. |
|||
|
23 Dec 2015, 14:28 (Ref:3599684) | #3562 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,473
|
Quote:
Quote:
Whatever. |
|||
|
23 Dec 2015, 18:25 (Ref:3599719) | #3563 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 135
|
Quote:
|
||
|
27 Dec 2015, 04:51 (Ref:3600374) | #3564 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 317
|
Quote:
The fact that Multimatic has its hands full with the Ford GT40 program (and they are trying to get help from anywhere they can get it in my neck of the woods right now) and the fact that Riley has IIRC not made a carbon-tubbed car since their Indycar tells me that they don't have a hope of having a competitive P2 car ready for their teams 13 months from now. Dallara might be able to do so, but they have a big hill to climb too because they don't have a prototype race car available right now. But of course, Oreca and Onroak don't, and that really is the point of the exercise I think. Oreca and Onroak knew they had an arms race brewing in the P2 class, and they got their friends at Le Mans to fix that, and IMSA went along with it, and while it may end up being a possible fix, I'm still of the opinion that it will turn into a complete fiasco, and after a year or two of the insanity IMSA will just kill the class and either make something of their own or just run GTE or some other GT car as the top of the series. |
|||
|
27 Dec 2015, 06:10 (Ref:3600377) | #3565 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
Only thing that Dallara has on their side is that they're not building LMP1 tubs for Audi anymore. YCom, who started building bodywork for Audi in 2011 or so, has built Audi's tubs since 2014. But even then, that's a double edged sword since they don't have very recent experience with building an LMP1 spec tub, which all LMP2 tubs have to pass LMP1 spec crash tests to be allowed to be homologated. Onroak and Oreca have that solved, since the JS P2 is based on a stillborn LMP1 car, and Oreca's car is just a budget, LMP2 spec version of the Rebellion R-One LMP1 car.
Dallara haven't built an LMP1 spec car (or any LMP1 car) since 2013 as result of Audi Sport switching to YCom for their tubs, and Multimatic are running the Ford GT program and Riley haven't built a full carbon tubbed car since 2000. Granted, this is all down to what the market will bear, but the edge will always go to proven designs, especially in cost-capped classes. |
||
|
27 Dec 2015, 08:16 (Ref:3600380) | #3566 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 391
|
One can only hope, GTE as the top class would be great.
|
|
|
27 Dec 2015, 08:30 (Ref:3600381) | #3567 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
Only stake I can see in this for the future is if either HPD stay in IMSA as an engine supplier, or they do manage to get someone to buy up these cars for either LMP2 or LMP1. I can't really see either of the latter options happening, because the LMP2 will be obsolete by 2018, and the LMP1 version would be by 2019 at the latest. That, and the LMP1 version would need a hybrid if it goes beyond a HPD customer car program (ie, non-privateer) and even that might be dodge given what the ACO/FIA would think.
And as far as IMSA throwing away the prototype classes, it'd take a total meltdown of the prototype market in North America. And even then, it'd take a similar fallout on the ACO/FIA end, as prototype, much like GTLM running broadly to ACO tech specs, it lip service to IMSA's agreements with the ACO and FIA. I don't forsee a change happening where the GT classes would be the main classes in IMSA like it was in the 1970s. |
||
|
27 Dec 2015, 10:55 (Ref:3600392) | #3568 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
Sounds like someone may have contacted HPD about a NAEC program for their car, on the grounds that the car can show speed at the Roar. We shall see if this goes anywhere.
|
||
|
27 Dec 2015, 16:23 (Ref:3600416) | #3569 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,473
|
It won't. Wanna bet?
|
|
|
27 Dec 2015, 16:59 (Ref:3600422) | #3570 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 797
|
DPs for Daytona 17 for sure - Jan 17 first test is too late to be ready to race in Jan 17, only the grandfathered cars will be ready, the Acura could be one of them.
|
||
|
27 Dec 2015, 17:32 (Ref:3600428) | #3571 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
HPD might be grandfathered, but whether it sees a race track in anger is up to whoever might buy or rent them to race. That remains to be seen for now, and the Daytona test and the 24 itself aren't very far away now.
|
||
|
27 Dec 2015, 19:23 (Ref:3600439) | #3572 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 797
|
The lack of 2017 cars available at the beginning of the 2017 IMSA season certainly presents a good opportunity for the Acura, otoh, it has been turned down completely by two teams already.
|
||
|
28 Dec 2015, 15:59 (Ref:3600547) | #3573 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 4,473
|
You guys might wanna take this discussion to the USCC 2016-2017 thread.
|
|
|
28 Dec 2015, 17:07 (Ref:3600560) | #3574 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,474
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
28 Dec 2015, 17:26 (Ref:3600569) | #3575 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,923
|
And with or without that stuff in the thread, as far as HPD in my opinion, their future in IMSA is as an engine supplier. IMSA rules still allow for stock block engines in Prototype; the Gibson/Zytek 4.2 LMP2 V8 is optional, but not required in IMSA.
Outside of that, they have a couple of cars built and race ready that no one's seeming really interested in buying for a full-season IMSA campaign, ACO rules will make their chassis obsolete in a couple of years (IMSA will apparently share chassis regs with the ACO), and they can only sell engines in IMSA, unless the ACO change their minds and allow a stock block option for their LMP2 class. Which that was rumored a while back, but nothing much has been said about that--or anything ACO LMP2 related--in quite a while. I wouldn't say that no news is necessarily good news there, for HPD or anyone else involved, as what the ACO does will still have some impact on IMSA, and especially HPD's engine market. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASCAR Car of the Future Plans | kingfloopy | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 24 | 18 Jan 2006 10:31 |
PI Future plans revealed | inpitlane | Australasian Touring Cars. | 14 | 26 Nov 2005 06:54 |
TC's plans for the future... | retro | Australasian Touring Cars. | 17 | 17 Aug 2004 03:33 |
PG's Plans for Future of OWRS ?!?! | zerO | ChampCar World Series | 19 | 9 Jan 2004 16:30 |
Future Plans | racer69 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 9 | 12 Jun 2001 17:35 |