|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
31 May 2014, 16:54 (Ref:3413222) | #4276 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Well it passed the scrutineering didn't it...
But I don't think this ends up being the only controversy this year, what with the EoT penalty system possibly coming into force in the race... |
|
|
31 May 2014, 17:00 (Ref:3413230) | #4277 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
But then again, how much stuff seems to make it pass the officials, seemingly with approval, that would seem to run against their own rules?
Either there's a rules loophole or the ACO are enforcing their rules as they see fit. Take your pick there... |
||
|
31 May 2014, 17:03 (Ref:3413235) | #4278 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
Could happen just like in F1 so often, first deemed legal but pressure from other teams then forces it to be banned later. So passing scrutineering means nothing other than it being ok for now
|
|
|
31 May 2014, 17:06 (Ref:3413237) | #4279 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
And Toyota ran a similar rear deck at LM that flexed, but the ACO pressured them to not run it the rest of 2013 and it was later banned due to the current flexible bodywork restrictions.
Ironically, it was Toyota again with the rear wing at Spa that began rumors of someone trying to exploit a loophole within that rule. |
||
|
31 May 2014, 17:07 (Ref:3413239) | #4280 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Yeah I guess the chance for it getting banned when single make is in question is higher than if all of them were running questionably (case example)
Hopefully it all gets sorted out before race week so that we don't get post-race complaints and then it's carried over to FIA Motorsport Countil complaint meeting happening in October or some crap |
|
|
31 May 2014, 17:07 (Ref:3413240) | #4281 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
The solution adopted by Porsche is in clear violation of the rules, especially Article 3.4 which explicitly prohibits bodywork elements/parts that would be movable at speed. I honestly cannot see how they could argue to be complying with the rules.
If the ACO-FIA do not react, you can bet that a formal complaint will be lodged by the competition. |
||
__________________
In order to finish first, first you have to finish |
31 May 2014, 17:09 (Ref:3413241) | #4282 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
And just couple of days earlier: http://www.racecar-engineering.com/n...-aerodynamics/
|
|
|
31 May 2014, 17:12 (Ref:3413243) | #4283 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 662
|
Quote:
I'm sure that the other teams are doing things that are outside of the rules too. I also highly doubt Porsche would just have done something illegal without having some way to argue that it is legal. |
|||
|
31 May 2014, 17:18 (Ref:3413245) | #4284 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Too bad for Porsche it's not the 991 that is being questioned, that one would've already received waiver from the ACO...
|
|
|
31 May 2014, 17:22 (Ref:3413251) | #4285 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
As for the competition, they are obviously playing with the rules as much as possible, but I do hope that they are cleverer than this. |
|||
__________________
In order to finish first, first you have to finish |
31 May 2014, 17:48 (Ref:3413264) | #4286 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,148
|
Seeing that this is such a blatant foul of the rules. Is it possible this is merely a diversion? So what are they really hiding. Maybe nothing at all but let the games begin....
|
|
|
31 May 2014, 18:03 (Ref:3413275) | #4287 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,187
|
Always nice to see a bit of controversy between the top cars...
|
||
__________________
Let's make better mistakes tomorrow! |
31 May 2014, 19:58 (Ref:3413332) | #4288 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,148
|
Is the Porsche running Brake-By-Wire?
|
|
|
31 May 2014, 20:58 (Ref:3413367) | #4289 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 662
|
|||
|
31 May 2014, 23:29 (Ref:3413398) | #4290 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,222
|
My prediction for tomorrow:
Fastest time Porsche 919 - 3m 24s Top Speed - 338 km/h |
||
|
1 Jun 2014, 01:25 (Ref:3413427) | #4291 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,561
|
They should be faster than that. Especially with the slimmer cars, should be 340kmh+ imo.
|
|
|
1 Jun 2014, 06:41 (Ref:3413472) | #4292 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 734
|
The lap times in Silverstone and Spa has showed that 2014-spec car cannot match the pace of 2013-spec. With a lack of maximum ICE power(which decides top speed-power side), I'd predict it to be 3.27-30, and a top speed of 330+.
|
||
__________________
Eat, sleep, race, repeat. |
1 Jun 2014, 06:59 (Ref:3413481) | #4293 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,148
|
That correct. The timing from Spa says the cars are not the same. What's strange to me is that the Toyota's ran the same top speed this year and the last at Spa in the low drag.
However I am lead to believe that the cars will actually be quicker because the cars have more power. I would argue the top speed is more limited by how much energy you can store before one of the straights. The Toyota's hit 335km/h down the straights in 2012 with a much less powerful hybrid system. If the 1000hp is close to being true, The Toyota's will easily demolish 340km/h. So will the Porsche's. The Porsche still maintains the ERS-H advantage. While the Toyota can recover 6MJ over the length of the lap finally. The Porsche can recover it earlier. Releasing more of the energy along the Mulsannes probably. Presumably the Toyota can run a energy store lap and then Run a lap with the same potential as the Porsche but as for in race hybrid strategy. Porsche has the advantage over everyone. Toyota has been caught off-guard by the Porsche strategy. I've counted several instances where Toyota people (drivers, Vasselons) have basically downplayed all parts of the Porsche other than the powertrain. Vasselon said the Toyota has a better chassis and braking. Buemi said the aero wasn't sophisticated. Just imagine where the Porsche will be when they get all that sorted then... |
|
|
1 Jun 2014, 07:25 (Ref:3413502) | #4294 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,232
|
And we have already 3.27 by the Toyota.
|
|
|
1 Jun 2014, 07:35 (Ref:3413505) | #4295 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,222
|
|||
|
1 Jun 2014, 07:45 (Ref:3413510) | #4296 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 1,756
|
||
|
1 Jun 2014, 07:54 (Ref:3413518) | #4297 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,222
|
3:26 NAKAJIMA :-)
with a slower 3rd sector, 3:25 is near :-) |
||
|
1 Jun 2014, 07:58 (Ref:3413521) | #4298 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,561
|
Where can you find live timing with sector times?
|
|
|
1 Jun 2014, 08:02 (Ref:3413524) | #4299 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,148
|
LOLOL. Audi's fastest in the speed traps!!
|
|
|
1 Jun 2014, 08:13 (Ref:3413531) | #4300 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,222
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] The Unified Power Rankings (GTP / Hypercar) | GT3_Fan | ACO Regulated Series | 123 | 28 Aug 2024 10:26 |
Cadillac GTP / Hypercar: Fan favorite | Adam43 | North American Racing | 68 | 22 Aug 2024 08:10 |
Lamborghini GTP / Hypercar: weigh in | veeten | North American Racing | 77 | 21 Jun 2024 12:59 |
Are there any differnces between a Porsche carerra cup Porsche and GT3 class Porsche? | SALEEN S7R | Sportscar & GT Racing | 25 | 6 Feb 2008 21:06 |
Joest Porsche VS Factory Porsche | H16 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 10 | 20 Dec 2001 14:07 |