|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
31 May 2006, 15:22 (Ref:1623890) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
I completely disagree that track of the stature and history like Le Mans should be modified because some computer geek in a design office got it wrong !!!
Then the rules should be changed , and not the track . And shame on anybody that doesnt have the balls to stand up and take blame for their design . SO the next that will happen , if the rules get changed and then we find out something new , we change the track again . The drivers want more power , let them have it but modify the aero rules . These guys are the ones that drive the cars and I feel its very arrogant of any governing body to try and tell them the rules . |
||
|
31 May 2006, 15:30 (Ref:1623893) | #27 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
Remember the Audi R8 is 6 years old, the R10, despite similar looks, is light years ahead of the R8 tech wise. Personally I couldn't really care less about 5-10mph, as long as overall times are quick? In fact the 3.5l Group C cars are a perfect example of this, they were much slower than the turbo Group C machines (600-700bhp vs 800-1000bhp) , but quicker over a single lap. As for comparisons between LMP1/LMP2, well the only pukka LMP1's that have been well developed, are quick and reliable, the Audi R10 and Pescarolo, don't seem to have any problems pulling away from LMP2s with ease. Comparing a factory P2 with an undeveloped P1 Dyson Lola, for example, is pointless. A very new factory R10 easily outpaced a well developed factory Porsche P2 at Sebring. At Le Mans I'm guessing most P2's will be closer to the pacesetting GT1's than pacesetting LMP1's. |
||
|
31 May 2006, 15:37 (Ref:1623900) | #28 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
These days, driver/spectator deaths are unacceptable. Drivers/fans etc. may understand the risks, in the outside world circuits are being closed for noise issues, nevermind deaths. Your sport adapts or dies, then theres only one loser. |
||
|
31 May 2006, 23:05 (Ref:1624235) | #29 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,837
|
another comment
If you click HERE you can see Jan Lammers '05 telemetry. Save the link beacuse it will be "real-time (live)" for this year's test days and race.
Top speed at the 1st chicaine was 309k/h, 2nd 302k/h and Indianapolis 306k/h. Also, changes have been made at Tertre Rouge which will affect entry speeds onto Mulsanne. |
||
__________________
No trees were harmed by this message. However, several million electrons were terribly inconvenienced |
31 May 2006, 23:10 (Ref:1624237) | #30 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,102
|
Quote:
|
||
|
1 Jun 2006, 05:14 (Ref:1624322) | #31 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 767
|
Quote:
But the R8 is an 'old rules' car. The floor splitter, floor and rear structure are completely different than what is on the LMP1 or Hyrid LMP1 cars. These new cars are supposedly much less pitch sensitive |
||
|
5 Jun 2006, 16:51 (Ref:1627725) | #32 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,699
|
I saw in the Audi release that Kristensen has admitted that they are not the fastest in a straight line, but that their handling is good along with their fuel economy.
|
||
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein |
5 Jun 2006, 17:02 (Ref:1627732) | #33 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 1,232
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
bernard |
6 Jun 2006, 01:52 (Ref:1628103) | #34 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,790
|
All that torque makes up for the lack of top end power, otherwise Audi wouldn't be a running an Oil Burner.
When your push yourself to terminal velocity faster than the next guy, he won't be able to catch you on top end until its too late. In the case of Le Mans, the layout of the track now plays into the hands of Audi more so than Pesca, simple really - Chiances, more shifting. Just like the difference between the Aston and Corvette is hp and high rpm vs torque production and low rpm and the lap times are pretty darn close aren't they? The Corvette does in the corners and coming out of the chiances and the Muslanne hairpin, etc. The Aston screams to the run down to Indy and any section of track that's LONG. It handles well enough that they don't loose too much time to the Vettes and that allows them to produce the excellent lap times they get here. Insert Problem, and this is how OEM's solve it. |
||
|
6 Jun 2006, 02:34 (Ref:1628113) | #35 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 12,042
|
lmp2s catchin up
remember the point of LMP2s was to decrease the cost of entering prototype racing, see Porsche, Radical and Acura. The P2s maybe be as fast with the lower power but alot less durable since alot of parts have to be alot more fragile to meet weight restrictions. Lets check the quali speeds/times and then see how well the faster P2s last in the race, remember the Penske Porsches have had a ***** of a time making it to then end on anything but glass smooth tracks, and the intersport lola has had its own problems (sorry cant comment on the LMS cars since I live in the dumbass country of nascar and its takeover of all things car-related.)
|
|
|
6 Jun 2006, 16:59 (Ref:1628640) | #36 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,790
|
Quote:
I really don't have a problem with LMP2 running with LMP1 cars on given tracks because I feel the true intentions of this class were to give the customer a fair shot at a factory supported team at places where their cubic dollar advantage is minimized. In America because of our tracks that are bumpy and twisty, the chance to beat the factory does come up QUITE a bit. Lola has done an outstanding job considering the resources they pull from and if they could pull the coup of supplying chassis to Acura initially, then I believe the car will finally have the "oats" under the hood to challange the RS Spyders on a regular basis if the driver and crew talent you would need to compete with Team Penske and Porsche's factory driver program. |
|||
|
8 Jun 2006, 08:35 (Ref:1629772) | #37 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 13
|
Top speeds
I miss the old Mulsanne straigt, with speeds over 400 km/h.
That was one of the things that make the Le mans uniq. I know it was changed for safety resons. But watching a car roar by at +400 km/h was something uniq (how do you spell roar ??) Karsten. |
||
|
8 Jun 2006, 10:29 (Ref:1629856) | #38 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,936
|
i would love to have been spectating on the mulsanne when the cars would blast past at 240+mph but the ACO's safety fears were that a car travelling 240mph braking into mulsanne were either the throttle got stuck or the brakes would not work were many spectators would have been killed and the driver killed instantly would have spelled an imminent end for lemans, it was one of the main reasons that motivated the chicanes in the mulsanne and the nature of mulsanne crashe's is that usually you smash into one wall, smash into the other and then the other and you would be very likely to be hit by another car so those were the main reasons why they put the chicanes in the mulsanne straight and also why the cars have been slowing down so much since then and 1999 due to these fears of a high speed crash when the chances are really 1 in a million and even when these cars do have high speed crashes the driver is very often unhurt because these cars have become so safe which in a way is a testament to modern engineering and as well with so many ways to slow cars down now like gurney flaps, smaller and smaller air restrictors and weight penalty's we will never see a return of all out fast cars which will hit 220/230 mph without many problems.
|
||
|
8 Jun 2006, 13:15 (Ref:1629954) | #39 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 13
|
John Nielsen 1985
I read an interview with John Nielsen (winner 1990 Jaguar) where he talks about his exit from Le-Mans 1985. He was driving for Sauber-mercedes and with full speed on the Mulsanne straight his car did a backwords flip.
He says he remember it as if it was in Slowmotion (upside Down seeing the headlights of the cars behind him) When the car finally stopped all the wheels where gone but the engine still running. P.S He is driving Zytek 06 this year. |
||
|
8 Jun 2006, 14:25 (Ref:1629989) | #40 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 13
|
Top speeds
Fastest car ever on the mulsanne straight WM P87 (Turbocharged) 1988 405 km/h / 251,7 mph. (the engine didnt last long)
Fastest car without turbo Sauber mercedes C9 (1989) 400 km/h / 248,5 mph without any special tuning during the race. Fisa felt it had grown unsafe. So in 1990 the 2 chicanes where introduced. |
||
|
8 Jun 2006, 14:28 (Ref:1629992) | #41 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 391
|
Quote:
Sauber was turbocharged, 5.0. IIRc 1989 XJR9s were fastest ever normally aspirated. |
|||
__________________
"It's a grand old team to play for, it's a grand old team to support: and if you know your history, it's enough to make your heart go..." |
8 Jun 2006, 14:31 (Ref:1629994) | #42 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 8,738
|
Quote:
|
||
|
9 Jun 2006, 09:05 (Ref:1630455) | #43 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 13
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
5 Jul 2006, 19:55 (Ref:1649101) | #44 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,814
|
Jan Lammers in one of the factory Jag's put down an unofficial topspeed of 403 km/h on slicks in a beginning drizzle! Can't remember wether this was '88 or '89 though.
|
||
|
5 Jul 2006, 20:01 (Ref:1649105) | #45 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 913
|
If the throttle stuck open or the brakes failed at Mulsanne Corner the driver could just go straight on.It's just a dead straight piece of road all the way to Tours!
|
||
|
6 Jul 2006, 16:38 (Ref:1649721) | #46 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,814
|
Im afraid that the ACO will add another chicane as soon as there's another "flipover" incident....
They allready covered up one such incident I believe. In 2004 that was. According to Norman Simon who was driving the Spyker that year,one of the privatly entered R8's(the silver/white team Goh car) did a complete flipover in the morning warm up,right in front of him. It seems the ACO is thinking that you can ban such accidents by ever reducing topspeeds and adding more slowing curves to the track... It's cutting the balls of a once great racetrack in my opinion. |
||
|
6 Jul 2006, 17:06 (Ref:1649746) | #47 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
No, you stop it by changing the flat bottom cars to the current regs, cutting out the aeroplane wing effect the old reg cars suffered from, incluing the R8.
|
|
|
6 Jul 2006, 18:28 (Ref:1649794) | #48 | ||||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,022
|
Quote:
Quote:
Last edited by Adam43; 6 Jul 2006 at 18:32. |
||||
__________________
Brum brum |
6 Jul 2006, 18:36 (Ref:1649806) | #49 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 44,022
|
Correct me if I am wrong, but I don't think there a Spyker there in 2004?
There was one there in 2003 and so was the Goh car. Quote:
Last edited by Adam43; 6 Jul 2006 at 18:40. |
|||
__________________
Brum brum |
7 Jul 2006, 07:04 (Ref:1650047) | #50 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 13,226
|
Just to add a bit more history to this, and before the chicanes were put in:-
1) During practice for the 1963 race, Phil Hill was clocked at 319.6 kph (198.6 mph) in the Aston Martin Project 215, and that was with less than 350bhp 2) During the 1970 event, Vic Elford in the Langheck version of the Porsche 917 recorded 383 kph (238 mph) with about 600bhp. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[LM24] Le Mans top speeds? | Garrett | 24 Heures du Mans | 3 | 27 Apr 2006 19:07 |
[LM24] Difference in top speeds at Le Mans | lemanfan | 24 Heures du Mans | 3 | 16 Jul 2004 10:38 |
[LM24] Top Speeds at Le Mans 2004 | rdjones | 24 Heures du Mans | 15 | 1 Jul 2004 07:43 |
[LM24] 1997 Le Mans trap speeds? | Splatz the Cow | 24 Heures du Mans | 5 | 31 May 2004 08:27 |
[LM24] 1998 Le Mans trap speeds? | MulsanneMike | 24 Heures du Mans | 5 | 23 May 2004 21:05 |