|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
30 Jun 2003, 16:43 (Ref:647374) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
|
||
|
30 Jun 2003, 16:50 (Ref:647382) | #27 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,743
|
welter rachel
|
|
__________________
I want you to drive flat out |
30 Jun 2003, 17:11 (Ref:647409) | #28 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,350
|
With LMP 675 finishing 3rd 4th and 5th at Atlanta it seems they may find pace and reliability just in time for the axe to fall!!
|
||
|
30 Jun 2003, 17:51 (Ref:647460) | #29 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,739
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
|
30 Jun 2003, 17:51 (Ref:647462) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
Don't get your hopes too high just yet...remember, it was one of the 2 hr. 45 min. races, and the lead Dyson car had yet more problems with the alternator -- one of the many gremlins that seems to plague the MG-Lola -- and one that seems to reoccur on a regular basis...
Note...The WR (Welter Racing) chassis has that Mazda rotary engine in it...it was the same chassis that died at Le Mans in the first half hour of the race in 2002.... Added Note: the car is not run by Welter racing itself, but Dawson, a team out of Atlanta...the car was the all-red prot on TV that was being passed by just about everyone still running on the circuit... |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
30 Jun 2003, 17:57 (Ref:647471) | #31 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
|
||
|
30 Jun 2003, 18:15 (Ref:647489) | #32 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 386
|
Oh yes, isn't the WR the same car that Jim Downing had at Road Atlanta yesterday? During the race I wondered if it was a rebadged Kudzu that Jim had finally taken in for crash testing...I guess not.
|
||
__________________
Stan Clayton Dauntless Racing |
30 Jun 2003, 18:54 (Ref:647528) | #33 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
Quote:
While talking to me, James Weaver reckoned that Dyson's yearly budget was somewhat less than that for a two car effort. (That was before factoring in any support given by AER and Lola, which would reduce their overall cost.) I'd say that Dyson will buy whatever can get them on the podium, and work out the season budget afterward. They won't (wouldn't) buy a car that's cheaper if they don't think it can be competitive. How much do you think they'd have saved if they had bought the R&S? What about the Crawford? A DP? That said, you're right that the next time out they'll buy into the top class - because that's where they want to be. Won't be a 900, though. Last edited by paul-collins; 30 Jun 2003 at 19:02. |
|||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
30 Jun 2003, 18:58 (Ref:647532) | #34 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
that said dyson is one of the better privateer racing teams there are, it is a shame they can not get into the best machinery- it'd be neat to see a thetford/norcold liveried Panoz run by the dyson guys, with Twin turbo 4 litre v8 from anyone...
|
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
30 Jun 2003, 19:08 (Ref:647542) | #35 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Just to clarify, I'm not saying the cost is to great for Dyson, who are out to win, outright.
But for the smaller teams who are running non MG/DBAs, the cost of the top cars is too much for them. I'm sure the LMP750 class will attract some GT and new teams, who at the moment will not compete as they cannot afford to buy/run an MG or DBA, and will only compete in LM675/750 when they can afford a car that can compete for class wins. As I say Dysons no t interested in class wins they want to win overall with which ever car is the best for there needs, hence they chose the MG over cheaper, but less competitive LMP900. BTW, they'll run an LMGTP? Could it be a Lola OR an Audi? The Bentley can be ruled out can't it? Last edited by JAG; 30 Jun 2003 at 19:15. |
|
|
30 Jun 2003, 19:11 (Ref:647547) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
Quote:
|
||
|
30 Jun 2003, 21:35 (Ref:647776) | #37 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,831
|
There is no "Dawson" Racing, its "Downing" as in Jim Downing of Kudzu and HANS fame.
|
|
|
30 Jun 2003, 21:42 (Ref:647786) | #38 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,936
|
You don't think there'll be an R&S MkIIID LMGTP chassis?
|
||
__________________
"Put a ****ing wheel on there! Let me go out again!" -Gilles Villeneuve, Zandvoort, 1979 |
30 Jun 2003, 23:48 (Ref:647883) | #39 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
|
After the recent success/pace of the MkIIIc it would be nice to see.
|
|
|
1 Jul 2003, 02:50 (Ref:647941) | #40 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 4,131
|
A few quick comments: the IMSA Nissan GTP was always a six cylinder engine. The Toyata GTP was a four cylinder.
I like the different classes. That is an aspect that has always drawn me to endurance sports car racing. Just need to make the smaller classes more feasable to build and run for smaller, less well funded teams. The fact that the Lola MG is not reliable after the efforts put into it is something of joke. I don't see how you are going to get to a full field of 900/GTP type cars anytime soon. Too much money. Unless you want to accept about 10-15 entries the calibur of the Norma (or worse). Look at the grids, there aren't that many top cars showing up in the US or Europe. If sponsorship dollars and factory involvement were so easy to come by, I wouldn't have to look for the kid's piggy banks to get a new engine for the endurance bike... |
||
__________________
You live and learn. At any rate, you live. Douglas Adams |
1 Jul 2003, 02:53 (Ref:647943) | #41 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
Panoz may be an older chassis, but the dyson team so famous for helping and or developing the car them selves, seem like a good match, after all it got 5th in lemans, after the VAG juggernaut. not bad
Dyson can do very well, and Lola 675 chassis is out now and the panoz is a consistant front runner or maybe Panoz need Dyson to make their car a real winner...? |
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
1 Jul 2003, 05:41 (Ref:647986) | #42 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 495
|
True that, Dyson could really give the Panoz a shot in the arm. I think they are much better off with the MG-Lola, as it is just way faster. I don't beleive it's capable of the Sebring win they want, but they are contenders for the pole at every race, and that's a good place to be.
Was the alternator what took the #20 car out of contention? |
||
__________________
"You always have to be smarter than the person next you"-J.C. Pringle "No matter where you go, there you are"-Pigkiller |
1 Jul 2003, 13:56 (Ref:648440) | #43 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
Sorry about the "Dawson" racing...it was typed into a response in a hurry...it is Downing...
But it is still slow, regardless of the name... |
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Why does Grand-Am bother? | aeroehl | North American Racing | 30 | 1 Jun 2006 12:29 |
Why Do They Bother? | GP Racer | Formula One | 51 | 27 Mar 2004 16:21 |
Nogaro -- Will Anyone Bother?? | Tim Northcutt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 40 | 24 Sep 2003 06:01 |
Should I bother Watching the Imola GP ? | Buckshot | Formula One | 8 | 16 Apr 2002 22:09 |
Anybody bother to read... | Sparky | Rallying & Rallycross | 1 | 16 Jan 2001 00:51 |