|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
16 Jan 2015, 13:26 (Ref:3493290) | #5001 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
Just spectacular!
|
||
|
16 Jan 2015, 13:27 (Ref:3493291) | #5002 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 662
|
|||
|
16 Jan 2015, 13:55 (Ref:3493297) | #5003 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 602
|
Here I was partaking in my morning ritual fully expecting to see nothing new. Beautiful!
Thanks to all for a great morning. She looks the business. Will the 2014 now be considered the ugly sister? |
|
|
16 Jan 2015, 13:58 (Ref:3493298) | #5004 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
|||
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:08 (Ref:3493301) | #5005 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 602
|
||
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:12 (Ref:3493302) | #5006 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
|||
__________________
In order to finish first, first you have to finish |
16 Jan 2015, 14:14 (Ref:3493303) | #5007 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,884
|
The fact it isn't painted suggests they'll be running a new livery next year.
Can't be worse than the outgoing one... |
||
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:19 (Ref:3493305) | #5008 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
I dont see the exhaust outlet on the left side like the 2014 car:
http://johndagys.wpengine.netdna-cdn...d/M15_0009.jpg |
||
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:21 (Ref:3493306) | #5009 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 11,891
|
Apart from the colour it does not actually look much different to last years and IMHO the front still looks ugly
|
||
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:23 (Ref:3493308) | #5010 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
|||
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:28 (Ref:3493313) | #5011 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
In order to finish first, first you have to finish |
16 Jan 2015, 14:30 (Ref:3493315) | #5012 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 662
|
Wasn't the exhaust always on the other side to this side of the car?
Edit: Actually no, the exhaust was on the left of the car (if you were looking at the rear) I can't see it in either of these shots so idk |
||
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:42 (Ref:3493323) | #5013 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
|||
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:44 (Ref:3493324) | #5014 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,746
|
Autosport have an article on the 919, with a couple of rather good photos of the car.
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/117379 |
||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
16 Jan 2015, 14:45 (Ref:3493326) | #5015 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 16,488
|
Agreed, this is a much prettier car than the 2014. But instead of the 2014 being the "ugly sister" I would call it the awkward teenager!
|
||
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:48 (Ref:3493329) | #5016 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,746
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
16 Jan 2015, 14:52 (Ref:3493331) | #5017 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Think it looks now prettier from side shots but uglier directly from front.
|
|
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:56 (Ref:3493333) | #5018 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 61
|
|||
|
16 Jan 2015, 14:59 (Ref:3493335) | #5019 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 312
|
Yeah not sure about this one. The nose looks way better on the old one. It had an agressive style with that curve under it. Looks kind of boring now.
|
|
|
16 Jan 2015, 15:04 (Ref:3493339) | #5020 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 662
|
If it has the dreadful performance livery again I'll be annoyed,
|
||
|
16 Jan 2015, 15:20 (Ref:3493346) | #5021 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,106
|
Some comparison shots between 2014 and 2015 car on DSC....
http://www.dailysportscar.com/2015/0...sche-919s.html I think the car looks MUCH more different than I had expected. Significant changes on the front. Will need to see more photos of the side/rear to see what has been done there. I think the car looks much better. I don't know how much of that is the raw car vs. pure black looking so much better than the really bad 2014 livery. Richard |
|
|
16 Jan 2015, 15:20 (Ref:3493347) | #5022 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 662
|
|||
|
16 Jan 2015, 15:26 (Ref:3493350) | #5023 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 4
|
I am really liking the new changes done to the front. Much better looking and hopefully are better aerodynamic-wise. Although I would like to see more changes done to the rest of the car before the start of the season.
Also like everyone else, I really - really hope for better livery this time around, last year's livery was dreadful. |
|
|
16 Jan 2015, 16:30 (Ref:3493357) | #5024 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
|
I think it looks terrible! The one thing I was hoping for was a front end more closely matching the launch car with some definition and aggressiveness.
This looks like a spaceship amusement park ride from the 1990's |
||
|
16 Jan 2015, 16:37 (Ref:3493360) | #5025 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 4,450
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] The Unified Power Rankings (GTP / Hypercar) | GT3_Fan | ACO Regulated Series | 123 | 28 Aug 2024 10:26 |
Cadillac GTP / Hypercar: Fan favorite | Adam43 | North American Racing | 68 | 22 Aug 2024 08:10 |
Lamborghini GTP / Hypercar: weigh in | veeten | North American Racing | 77 | 21 Jun 2024 12:59 |
Are there any differnces between a Porsche carerra cup Porsche and GT3 class Porsche? | SALEEN S7R | Sportscar & GT Racing | 25 | 6 Feb 2008 21:06 |
Joest Porsche VS Factory Porsche | H16 | Sportscar & GT Racing | 10 | 20 Dec 2001 14:07 |