Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Sportscar & GT Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 14 Jul 2014, 08:41 (Ref:3433765)   #5226
GT6
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
England
MAIDSTONE, KENT, ENGLAND
Posts: 11,891
GT6 is going for a new world record!GT6 is going for a new world record!GT6 is going for a new world record!GT6 is going for a new world record!GT6 is going for a new world record!GT6 is going for a new world record!GT6 is going for a new world record!
I agree Audi has spent a lot of money,time and effort to have the brand linked to endurance racing and i can not see them giving all that up just because another part of VAG wants to compete, intercompany rivalry can be very strong in any case
GT6 is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jul 2014, 10:23 (Ref:3433781)   #5227
MyNameIsNigel
Veteran
 
MyNameIsNigel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Switzerland
Lake Geneva Area
Posts: 2,132
MyNameIsNigel has a real shot at the podium!MyNameIsNigel has a real shot at the podium!MyNameIsNigel has a real shot at the podium!MyNameIsNigel has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham Goodwin View Post
I keep seeing speculation on whether Audi will pack it in - usually predicated on whether VAG will decide to 'let Porsche win'.

The fact is that Audi's continued participation in top level sportscars is commercially successful, and has been for most of the programme - look at Audi's sales figures over a decade and more and there's little reason to believe that there's a case to stop. The current TV ad campaign again underlines their basic message - We are proving our road car technology through our (super successful) race programme. Few other carmakers can credibly claim the same.

Add to that that Audi have just moved into a bespoke, and much larger, motorsports HQ, and I'd be VERY surprised to see them leave LMP any time soon.


I don't see Audi leaving any time soon either, especially considering that Endurance racing and the FIA-WEC are currently the best (if only) place where Audi can excel. Endurance racing is very much part of Audi's DNA now.
MyNameIsNigel is offline  
__________________
In order to finish first, first you have to finish
Quote
Old 14 Jul 2014, 18:13 (Ref:3433870)   #5228
FstrthnU
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
United States
Posts: 1,569
FstrthnU should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridFstrthnU should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridFstrthnU should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
http://sportscar365.com/lemans/leman...otype-options/
Seems like Ford is leaning towards a 2016 factory GTE program with a new 3rd-generation Ford GT. In addition, engine supply to LMP2 also considered (since factory LMP2 teams are banned from ACO racing). Ford Mustang GTE was considered but tabled.
FstrthnU is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jul 2014, 18:18 (Ref:3433872)   #5229
Articus
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,148
Articus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridArticus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridArticus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Interesting. I was suspecting but couldn't put to words earlier but this win was particularly important for Audi because it could mean that Porsche won't be building the underpinnings of more Audi vehicles in the near future. So they have bought themselves a certain amount of independence with the win.
Articus is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jul 2014, 18:24 (Ref:3433875)   #5230
Articus
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,148
Articus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridArticus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridArticus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
GT vs Viper vs Vette and Aston vs Ferrari vs Porsche

Who said we couldn't have nice things?
Articus is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jul 2014, 19:13 (Ref:3433898)   #5231
lms
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 750
lms should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by FstrthnU View Post
Mustang GTE
lms is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jul 2014, 23:39 (Ref:3433970)   #5232
Accident
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 901
Accident should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridAccident should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridAccident should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by lms View Post
Would it be any worse than the Z4 or M3?
Accident is offline  
Quote
Old 14 Jul 2014, 23:55 (Ref:3433975)   #5233
TF110
Veteran
 
TF110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
United States
Posts: 15,561
TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!
Id rather a new sportscar, not a 'ponycar' as they call them here.
TF110 is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 00:03 (Ref:3433977)   #5234
Articus
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,148
Articus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridArticus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridArticus should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Dodge and GM already set precedent by running the Viper and the Vette as opposed to the Challenger and the Camaro. So it was sensible for Ford for shut down the GTE Mustang. Anyway to go with the Mustang would seem like a wasted opportunity because they have been thinking about a Ford GT successor for a long time. They could make a who lot more of a big deal about a Ford GT at Le Mans anyway.

And it wouldn't make sense to run anything before 2016 anyway.
Articus is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 00:04 (Ref:3433978)   #5235
Dyson Mazda
Veteran
 
Dyson Mazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
United States
Charlotte, NC
Posts: 914
Dyson Mazda should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDyson Mazda should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Accident View Post
Would it be any worse than the Z4 or M3?
Not to mention the Bentley GT3
Dyson Mazda is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 01:20 (Ref:3433983)   #5236
Rcz
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
United States
Posts: 1,078
Rcz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Or the Lexus RC GT3
Rcz is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 02:37 (Ref:3433992)   #5237
MagVanisher
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
MagVanisher should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridMagVanisher should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
That's good news for Ford! I'm glad that they'll be making a 3rd generation Ford GT in addition to supplying P2 teams with their Ecoboost engine.

Still, isn't a bit too late for Ford fielding a GTE car in 2016. In the future, the former GT2 class plus GT3 might merge into a single GT class, split between All-Pro and Pro/Am.

Even though both ACO, FIA, and some of the manufacturers failed regarding the convergence talks, it's still open for discussion in my opinion.
MagVanisher is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 03:31 (Ref:3433995)   #5238
MitchZ06
Veteran
 
MitchZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
New Zealand
Australia
Posts: 2,263
MitchZ06 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So Ford GT GTE Ecoboost?
MitchZ06 is offline  
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 04:24 (Ref:3434004)   #5239
MagVanisher
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 2,396
MagVanisher should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridMagVanisher should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by MitchZ06 View Post
So Ford GT GTE Ecoboost?
Doubt that it'll happen. From an engine standpoint, a forced-induced V8 (supercharged, turbocharged, both) would be a better option.
MagVanisher is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 04:24 (Ref:3434005)   #5240
GT3.14
Veteran
 
GT3.14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 834
GT3.14 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGT3.14 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridGT3.14 should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by FstrthnU View Post
http://sportscar365.com/lemans/leman...otype-options/
factory LMP2 teams are banned from ACO racing).

Is there really a point to this rule anymore with all pro lineups allowed in P2 now as long as the car can be bought by a privateer at the cost cap?
GT3.14 is offline  
__________________
Matra V12
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 05:11 (Ref:3434014)   #5241
HORNDAWG
Veteran
 
HORNDAWG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
United States
Oregon
Posts: 8,919
HORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridHORNDAWG should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by FstrthnU View Post
http://sportscar365.com/lemans/leman...otype-options/
Seems like Ford is leaning towards a 2016 factory GTE program with a new 3rd-generation Ford GT. In addition, engine supply to LMP2 also considered (since factory LMP2 teams are banned from ACO racing). Ford Mustang GTE was considered but tabled.
Factory cars are NOT banned from ACO racing.

"The cars that may be considered as "factory cars", whose technical characteristics and level of development are clearly not complying with the objectives of the LMP2 regulations may be refused by the Endurance Committee"

http://www.24h-lemans.com/wpphpFichi...ions-lm-p2.pdf





L.P.
HORNDAWG is offline  
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 08:20 (Ref:3434039)   #5242
Deleted
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
Deleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Yet in the sporting regs it says "The LMP2 category is reserved exclusively for private teams that are independent of manufacturers and/or engine suppliers"

Furthermore in the technical regs: "Each model of car must be sold by the Manufacturer to a private team (at least one car) entered in the World Endurance Championship or any other International Series sanctioned by the FIA."
So no sole manufacturer entries...

And I read that "may be" just as wordplay anyway, just as it says "may be" in the first line... no way in hell would Ford (as Ford) receive entry without everyone complaining.

This is the most recent revision by the way, most notably outlawig Mazda's diesel http://www.fia.com/sites/default/fil...%202014-dc.pdf
Deleted is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 08:48 (Ref:3434045)   #5243
TzeiTzei
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Finland
Posts: 1,157
TzeiTzei should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridTzeiTzei should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridTzeiTzei should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiana View Post
Yet in the sporting regs it says "The LMP2 category is reserved exclusively for private teams that are independent of manufacturers and/or engine suppliers"

Furthermore in the technical regs: "Each model of car must be sold by the Manufacturer to a private team (at least one car) entered in the World Endurance Championship or any other International Series sanctioned by the FIA."
So no sole manufacturer entries...
What defines a manufacturer? Aren't Oak basically a manufacturer? How about Strakka then, are they a manufacturer now?
TzeiTzei is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 09:22 (Ref:3434050)   #5244
Deleted
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
Deleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameDeleted will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
Well in case of Strakka no as Dome clearly builds the car and they're (really) still a customer, but otherwise it's an interesting question...

Thou I think the fact that the likes of Oak aren't actual street car manufacturers makes them different, they're still sorta independent
Deleted is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 10:36 (Ref:3434068)   #5245
lms
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 750
lms should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Accident View Post
Would it be any worse than the Z4
yes

Quote:
Originally Posted by Accident View Post
or M3?
no
lms is offline  
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 11:06 (Ref:3434077)   #5246
MyNameIsNigel
Veteran
 
MyNameIsNigel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Switzerland
Lake Geneva Area
Posts: 2,132
MyNameIsNigel has a real shot at the podium!MyNameIsNigel has a real shot at the podium!MyNameIsNigel has a real shot at the podium!MyNameIsNigel has a real shot at the podium!
Quote:
Originally Posted by TzeiTzei View Post
What defines a manufacturer? Aren't Oak basically a manufacturer? How about Strakka then, are they a manufacturer now?
Very good question indeed and this is a valid question for the LMP1-L category as well BTW, as this category is likewise supposed to be reserved exclusively for "independent private teams".

As far as the LMP2 category is concerned, it would seem that the term "manufacturer" is used exclusively to refer to the actual chassis manufacturer, not to the engine supplier as such. This seems to be a subtle difference compared to the LMP1 category, where a "Manufacturer" means "the associaton constituted by the manufacturer of the chassis and the manufacturer of the engine, i.e. by the physical persons or legal entities holding, or entitled to use, the intellectual property rights pertaining to the chassis and to the engine, the names of which feature on the homologation form issued (...) by the FIA jointly with the ACO (...)" (in accordance with the definition given in the Sporting Regulations).

As far as the Morgan LM P2 and the new Ligier JS P2 are concerned, both of them are manufactured by Onroak Automotive, which I guess shall be understood as the "chassis manufacturer". In that respect, are OAK Racing truly "independent" of Onroak Automotive considering that these are affiliated entities ?

In the case of the Strakka-Dome "partnership", it would seem that the separation between the private team (i.e. Strakka Racing) and the actual chassis manufacturer (i.e. Dome) is clearer, Strakka-Racing appearing to be essentially a (true) Dome customer.

What about the Rebellion-Racing / Oreca relationship ?
MyNameIsNigel is offline  
__________________
In order to finish first, first you have to finish
Quote
Old 15 Jul 2014, 18:30 (Ref:3434197)   #5247
Graham Goodwin
Veteran
 
Graham Goodwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
United Kingdom
Epsom UK
Posts: 3,399
Graham Goodwin is going for a new world record!Graham Goodwin is going for a new world record!Graham Goodwin is going for a new world record!Graham Goodwin is going for a new world record!Graham Goodwin is going for a new world record!Graham Goodwin is going for a new world record!Graham Goodwin is going for a new world record!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chiana View Post
Well in case of Strakka no as Dome clearly builds the car and they're (really) still a customer, but otherwise it's an interesting question...
Dome doesn't build the car - they designed it, work closely with Strakka on implementation and provide some key components (including the monocoque, but the majority of components are sourced by Strakka, the supply chain is theirs.
Graham Goodwin is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jul 2014, 03:17 (Ref:3434743)   #5248
Bobby_status
Racer
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 108
Bobby_status should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid




http://as-web.jp/photonews/info.php?c_id=9&no=59863
Any teams linked to this car?
Bobby_status is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jul 2014, 06:45 (Ref:3434772)   #5249
TF110
Veteran
 
TF110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
United States
Posts: 15,561
TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!
Your pics arent showing...







Testing was at Sugo. Estimated lap time was 1:33 in the wet.
TF110 is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jul 2014, 08:06 (Ref:3434797)   #5250
TF110
Veteran
 
TF110's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
United States
Posts: 15,561
TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!TF110 is going for a new world record!
Sorry! Too late to edit post. Testing was done at Okayama, not Sugo!

If the track was wet, times of 1:33's would place it at the front of the GT300/GT3 pack in those conditions. Rd.1 @Okayama had a wet free practice, and the leading car in that class was the Gainer SLS GT3 with a 1:33.635 from a 1:34.031 of the B-Max GTR GT3.
TF110 is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[LM24] 2014 Le Mans Entry Rumours The Badger 24 Heures du Mans 47 30 Sep 2013 22:04
Rumours more rumours! crazytrain ChampCar World Series 11 7 Oct 2002 17:06
[LM24] Le Mans Series and Sportscar Racer Speedworx 24 Heures du Mans 20 6 Feb 2002 03:55
log-in repetition Unregistered Announcements and Feedback 6 10 Apr 2001 17:26
Repetition... Chris Y Touring Car Racing 6 20 Mar 2001 14:33


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:08.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.