Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Club Level Single Seaters

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 7 Nov 2008, 17:07 (Ref:2330187)   #51
sharkie
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 26
sharkie should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Chris is right , both Herron & McKenna are looking to follow Boyd into UK Duratech,both chassis and drivers are brilliant,but why ask if the engines for sale, go buy a Bold from england....they have won the festival AND walter hayes for the last few years!!!

As for Noel Careys Mygale, think its a bit unfair to call it , it set the quickest time at Kirko this year and Dunne and Fisher sure make em work, think he just couldn't resist getting his old Ray back!

Back on topic, the Junior idea is excellent but don't be confused its aimed at drivers with out a budget to do UK Duratech, it is a new class like it or not, maybe good enough to fill the gap left by BMW if sold properly to the rich and dull karting faternity!
sharkie is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Nov 2008, 17:36 (Ref:2330209)   #52
Barry Pomfret
Racer
 
Barry Pomfret's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Milton Keynes
Posts: 318
Barry Pomfret should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The idea leading to the development of this class is an engine which is cheap to run, does not need rebuilding at 1000 miles and will fit in existing chassis ? I'm sure that's where zetec came in, you can buy an engine from Ford for £1000, stick on a dry sump kit and go racing for 3000 miles. How much cheaper do you need it to be? I know the engine is a lump but the Duratecs at the Festival were not much quicker, if you did away with the cast iron exhaust manifold and stuck on a fabricated job as the F4 s do it would make a cheap and reliable club class of Formula Ford (and stick them back on ACB10s with steel rims).
Barry Pomfret is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Nov 2008, 17:44 (Ref:2330216)   #53
jimbomit
Racer
 
jimbomit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
England
Cheshire
Posts: 179
jimbomit should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Just to add an angle, abandon ACB10's, there are plenty of cheaper better alternatives that would support the ethos of a low cost formula.

If you want to differentiate your product and have a unique angle to the low cost option, why not run a feasibility on the diesel unit?

Just stuff to throw into the bag . . . . !
jimbomit is offline  
Quote
Old 7 Nov 2008, 22:36 (Ref:2330355)   #54
FFmygale
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
England
UK
Posts: 300
FFmygale should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It has been apparent to me for a good while that what is really needed is to find some way of getting the national calss Fford back to a situation where they are comparable in some way to amateur FFord. ie. if we could get all the amateur guys racing against the national class guys in the end of season Festival and Walter Hayes then surely that would be a step forward???

How we achieve this however is a different story! I just don't have the solution.
FFmygale is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2008, 15:54 (Ref:2330668)   #55
itsonlyme
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2004
England
Posts: 130
itsonlyme has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Quote:
Originally Posted by FFmygale
It has been apparent to me for a good while that what is really needed is to find some way of getting the national calss Fford back to a situation where they are comparable in some way to amateur FFord. ie. if we could get all the amateur guys racing against the national class guys in the end of season Festival and Walter Hayes then surely that would be a step forward???

How we achieve this however is a different story! I just don't have the solution.
just go back a few years to before zetecs arrived on the scene (sorry zetec owners but thats when ford and brscc ruined ff1600!)
itsonlyme is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2008, 16:41 (Ref:2330678)   #56
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by itsonlyme
just go back a few years to before zetecs arrived on the scene (sorry zetec owners but thats when ford and brscc ruined ff1600!)
Ste it will not be long before the Duratecs are converted into Kents. There are still plenty of Kent engines all we need are good quality parts.
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2008, 16:58 (Ref:2330685)   #57
brakedisc
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 299
brakedisc should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I would suggest that there should be a single racing club for FF similiar to Sports 2000. High membership costs £100 + and go get someone like JEB as the boss. Have ten meetings a year based on FF with UK championship at the top with Zetec and FF1600 involved as well. 2 Day format, 30 min test for the three classes on Sat Morning in sessions depending on entries. Qualify Sat afternoon again in sessions, then 2 races on Sunday. Rules to be stable for 5 years. Benefits are that we deal with circuits as a group, are all together in the one place to have meetings re regulations. We would also have a ladder to climb for both teams and drivers. Equipment would have better re-sale values and with only a couple of days away from home, would win brownie points with the family. With a proper calendar that does not clash with other formulas the Pro teams or could go and try their skills in other classes.
brakedisc is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2008, 17:19 (Ref:2330691)   #58
08u05
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 179
08u05 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
That idea is all well and good, but that takes the drivers away from the people they are trying to impress. We run our lads in Duratecs in front of the F3 guys as that is the next step on the ladder for them, taking them away from that would make their lives more difficult.
08u05 is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2008, 17:58 (Ref:2330712)   #59
brakedisc
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 299
brakedisc should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
And how many drivers in UK duratecs will make the move to BF3? More will come from Renault who run with BTCC. Be positive think of the majority not a few who can afford F3
brakedisc is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2008, 18:28 (Ref:2330724)   #60
08u05
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 179
08u05 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
You have to remember a move to the BTCC package was mooted for British Formula Ford, but the thought was to stay with the SRO package for exactly the reason I mentioned above.....
08u05 is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2008, 20:52 (Ref:2330792)   #61
FFmygale
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
England
UK
Posts: 300
FFmygale should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue nose
Ste it will not be long before the Duratecs are converted into Kents. There are still plenty of Kent engines all we need are good quality parts.
Is that really a step forward???? surely not. There will come a point in the near future where (unless someone starts re-manufacturing bits) Kent engine parts become as rare as rocking horse sheet. Surely the use of a Duratec engine in some form is likey to be the way forward? The issue is how to achieve this without ruining the kent engined championships (which is probably difficult) but is something that needs to be considered.
FFmygale is offline  
Quote
Old 8 Nov 2008, 21:25 (Ref:2330805)   #62
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I have just got hold of some 90s festival programs "The world cup" if we could bring that back it would be great.

There are plenty of old engines around and still cheap the problem is the rebuild cost. Plus the poor quality parts that are being forced on us.

How big are the Duratec grids.

Early 90s format was the best watchable racing. All this was done with the zetec... remember them.
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2008, 20:14 (Ref:2333323)   #63
JEB
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 600
JEB has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
I read with interest, and I have my own view (obviously).

130 + Kent cars in the WHT prove that the category is still very popular and loved my many. Yes, rising costs are difficult to sustain, as are parts (but they are available) but costs rise in all forms of motorsport.

It must not be forgotten that FF1600 covers all ages of cars (from HSCC to the latest 2008 machines), and no matter how many cars are possibles to be changed - if indeed they are to be - would have a very big knock on all levels of Kent-powered FF1600.

Indeed, if Duratecs were ever to be seen on-track alongside Kents, I know the WHT would never see 130+ cars again. I personally think that would be a great shame.
JEB is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2008, 21:06 (Ref:2333355)   #64
08u05
Racer
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 179
08u05 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Can I quickly clear up the fact that Duratecs will never be on track at the same time as Kents, this idea is being mooted as a NEW CHAMPIONSHIP.
08u05 is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2008, 21:52 (Ref:2333396)   #65
SAMD
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,523
SAMD should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridSAMD should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
blurb copied from Irish FF1600 competitors

It looks like Duratech for the clubman is not far away.
>
> The sooner the better in my opinion, the top teams running new Kent cars
> are draining away Kent parts faster than anyone else. I cant see our
> cars (pre 90) ever converting, I imagine it would be post 2000 cars at the most that will convert.
>
> The notion that the Irish contingent may go ahead and alter the ruling on crankshaft material and flywheel diameter may well have some merit, but the flywheel is a problem, It needs reduced in diameter to stop it grounding, but this is going to affect performance for one thing, and how do you work the ring gear for another? It will take a fair amount of work to sort this out.
>
SAMD is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2008, 21:53 (Ref:2333399)   #66
SAMD
Veteran
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,523
SAMD should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridSAMD should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
SAMD is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Nov 2008, 22:09 (Ref:2333408)   #67
kartingdad
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,229
kartingdad has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Ask the Aussies.
kartingdad is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Nov 2008, 10:49 (Ref:2333626)   #68
Tim Draffan
Racer
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location:
Redbourn, Hertfordshire
Posts: 108
Tim Draffan should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I think we are looking at two seperate issues simply because pre '90 cars and some later cars would be too dificult to change or the cost will make it prohibitive or the owner is happy to continue with a Kent.
So we need a way forward to provide sensibly priced good quality parts for the Kent engine.
A better quality crank is a no brainer, but are there enough old blocks out there to keep the class going?
And re-smaller diameter flywheels, I fitted a skid plate either side of the the flywheel which prevents it "grounding" a far easier solution thah having to modify the bell housing and starter.

Secondly is there a place for a low cost Duratec class below national Formula Ford?

Well wouldn't it be better for the class if it was low cost to strart with?
Yes some of our better healed clubman would change class and some of the young guns might not be interested in FF1600 but I don't think it would be a threat to the health of FF1600 as it now.
Tim Draffan is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Nov 2008, 19:00 (Ref:2333849)   #69
onenastyviper
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 65
onenastyviper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

Sorry but as far as I am concerned I do not care what engine is in the back of my car, it's the driving and racing I enjoy.

Do we really go round saying that we are Kent engine formula ford drivers just to differentiate ourselves from 'other' drivers??

What about the latest environmental push by the FIA and MSA for catalytic converters? How long before they become mandated for 'all' racing series making the Kent engine a footnote in history?

As a VD87 owner, I am in two minds about this happening as my car will probably require extensive (read: expensive) modifications to fit a duratec engine if it is even possible.

As for the duratec itself, ~£4500+vat for basic engine but ~£6500+vat for engine and electronics...hmm, £2000 for electronics, have they never heard of Megasquirt?
onenastyviper is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Nov 2008, 19:14 (Ref:2333861)   #70
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by onenastyviper
Sorry but as far as I am concerned I do not care what engine is in the back of my car, it's the driving and racing I enjoy.

Do we really go round saying that we are Kent engine formula ford drivers just to differentiate ourselves from 'other' drivers??

What about the latest environmental push by the FIA and MSA for catalytic converters? How long before they become mandated for 'all' racing series making the Kent engine a footnote in history?

As a VD87 owner, I am in two minds about this happening as my car will probably require extensive (read: expensive) modifications to fit a duratec engine if it is even possible.

As for the duratec itself, ~£4500+vat for basic engine but ~£6500+vat for engine and electronics...hmm, £2000 for electronics, have they never heard of Megasquirt?
Mr Dirk Diggler we do say that we are Formula Ford Kent drivers Diz can even remember back 41 years when it started.

But as far as putting a Duratec Mazda in the back no thanks.
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Old 12 Nov 2008, 19:29 (Ref:2333864)   #71
onenastyviper
Rookie
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 65
onenastyviper should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue nose
Mr Dirk Diggler we do say that we are Formula Ford Kent drivers Diz can even remember back 41 years when it started.

But as far as putting a Duratec Mazda in the back no thanks.
Yay, rotary power all the way...
onenastyviper is offline  
Quote
Old 13 Nov 2008, 15:10 (Ref:2334320)   #72
Triple J Motorsport
Veteran
 
Triple J Motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
England
Burgess Hill W Sussex
Posts: 1,920
Triple J Motorsport should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Don't think a smaller flywheel is a realistic option but a lighter one is as it will "protect" the crank too


Quote:
Originally Posted by Tim Draffan
I think we are looking at two seperate issues simply because pre '90 cars and some later cars would be too dificult to change or the cost will make it prohibitive or the owner is happy to continue with a Kent.
So we need a way forward to provide sensibly priced good quality parts for the Kent engine.
A better quality crank is a no brainer, but are there enough old blocks out there to keep the class going?
And re-smaller diameter flywheels, I fitted a skid plate either side of the the flywheel which prevents it "grounding" a far easier solution thah having to modify the bell housing and starter.

Secondly is there a place for a low cost Duratec class below national Formula Ford?

Well wouldn't it be better for the class if it was low cost to strart with?
Yes some of our better healed clubman would change class and some of the young guns might not be interested in FF1600 but I don't think it would be a threat to the health of FF1600 as it now.
Triple J Motorsport is offline  
__________________
Built and Engineered FFZetec 2006 festival winner.

3rd 2009 & 2012 FFZetec festival final
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
[Formula Ford Aus] Formula Ford Continues To Grow As Series Heads To Oran Park wensleydale Press Releases 1 3 Aug 2006 08:11
Avon Junior Formula Ford - 2002 Russfeld National & International Single Seaters 5 19 Dec 2001 20:33


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:19.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.