The Noughties

[Falcadore]

Originally Posted by STEALTHY

I'm sorry you fell that way, but you are not everyone. Pole positions are still apart of our sport, so they should be listed aswell.

Whilst i'm not disagreeing every driver would rather a win than a pole, it doesn't mean they shouldn't be counted.

I'm not saying they shouldn't be counted. But you wanted to know dominance. That's measured by winning. Not by the garlic bread.

How many horse trainers do you see saying, "yeah, but he was the favourite!"

[NewsStalker]

Bart Cummins?

(Oh yeah - his favourites usually win though )

[STEALTHY]

Originally Posted by Falcadore

I'm not saying they shouldn't be counted. But you wanted to know dominance. That's measured by winning. Not by the garlic bread.

How many horse trainers do you see saying, "yeah, but he was the favourite!"

I said before (and you quoted so i assume you read it) excuse the bad wording, using 'dominance'. Just wanted to know who had the most of each integral part of our series. Poles included, since certain people hear say the series is just processional, the pole positions should equally match the wins

[Falcadore]

Originally Posted by STEALTHY

I said before (and you quoted so i assume you read it) excuse the bad wording, using 'dominance'. Just wanted to know who had the most of each integral part of our series. Poles included, since certain people hear say the series is just processional, the pole positions should equally match the wins

Grid placement does not affect whether a race is processional or not. To suggest that is to suggest that front row starters never get bad starts.

[STEALTHY]

Originally Posted by Falcadore

Grid placement does not affect whether a race is processional or not. To suggest that is to suggest that front row starters never get bad starts.

I think you missed the


I'll make it more opbvious this time