|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
12 Feb 2011, 10:35 (Ref:2830031) | #76 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,909
|
I like this one. It has a very pleasant flow to it.
Two things, both about T1: first of all, since this point seems to be the only genuine overtaking chance, it might be useful to tighten it a bit - really only a little bit though. Second: I would put a wider gravel trap there. But, apart from these, I find no fault with it. Thumbs up! bio |
||
|
12 Feb 2011, 21:02 (Ref:2830244) | #77 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
Ive called this Purist after our esteemed colleague and once I'd read his comments about fast tracks being over 66% straights i decided to draw something that might fit the scheme.
This is 3.3 miles (5310m) clockwise and quite wide...(16m) so it has plenty of room to overtake. Its not in the ultra high speed category because the corners would take it down (one major hairpin and the esses coming onto the pit straight, but the majority of the circuit is straights and medium to high speed corners. I did an analysis and haven't hit the 66% target. its about 60% straights so fails the test. I'll have to try again! Last edited by Teretonga; 12 Feb 2011 at 21:19. |
|
|
12 Feb 2011, 21:16 (Ref:2830248) | #78 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,716
|
I'd add run off/gravel at T3 and likewise on the esses at the end of the lap, if one section has gravel then they all should.
Other than that it's pretty straight forward though perhaps not very challenging...but for racing does it have to be challenging? |
||
|
12 Feb 2011, 21:31 (Ref:2830257) | #79 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
Quote:
Monza is challenging, Spa is challenging, but what actually provides good racing? In the lesser formula simple circuits often provide closer racing, more passing and better entertainment. I don't see people at the end of really close race going "oh it was great racing but not very challenging",. Most of the time they're estatic over the quality of the RACE.... adrenalin is pumping buzzing and everyone is excited. Like Monza's Italian GP in 1971. Fantastic race... A driving challenge? In one sense yes, but was a great 'drivers circuit'? No. |
||
|
12 Feb 2011, 22:26 (Ref:2830278) | #80 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
[ATTACH][/ATTACH]Purist 3.3m has been revised into Purist 3.4m (another 161m) with a longer straight out of turn 3 into the turn 4 hairpin which has also been opened up. I have also taken note of SBF's suggestions. The main infield straight is now 962m. now it reaches the 66% mark (68%)
Last edited by Teretonga; 12 Feb 2011 at 22:43. |
|
|
13 Feb 2011, 00:14 (Ref:2830298) | #81 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,909
|
I like both versiuos, the second one a bit more though It's good, it's got everything - thumbs up!
bio |
||
|
15 Feb 2011, 09:05 (Ref:2831450) | #82 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
Quote:
I wanted something that was fairly quick and allowed cars to get a good head of steam but that actually had places that would be a bit of a challenge. if I could demonstrate the camber and elevation changes it would make this a lot more interesting. Something I still have to learn. |
||
|
17 Feb 2011, 01:54 (Ref:2832463) | #83 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 925
|
This track reminds me of traks in south america for some reason, maybe Brazilian?
I like it a lot because of the club flavor, that would be quite a piece to have fun in, and to add to SBF's comment, I think any piece of road will be good for racing for as long as there are at least two competitors fact is to a certain degree,the simpler the track the more intense the racing, a too "challenging" track makes for processional races, just look at PI and you will see what I mean for a simple track. I think a track should have at least a couple of challenges to see how different pilots solve the problem in different ways, |
|
__________________
F.I.M. Certified Race Director whowhaa!!! |
2 Mar 2011, 09:23 (Ref:2838946) | #84 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
Sooo
For this Mad March month No.1 2.75 miles of clockwise rotation. |
|
|
3 Mar 2011, 08:01 (Ref:2839474) | #85 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
And another, Clockwise 3.14 miles, 14.5m wide constant width.
|
|
|
3 Mar 2011, 10:18 (Ref:2839541) | #86 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,067
|
Oh yeah I like that 2nd one you've done there.
I especially like the opening sequence of corners. Lots of feathering through T1, leading to a great slipstream battle down to T2, which isn't your generic hairpin, either. Fantastic. There's even a bit of room to perhaps return a pass going round T3 - again, without using conventional tight hairpins. Could be a slight problem with run-off perhaps? Not too sure. I'm also a fan of the final turn as far as overtaking goes, too. 4, 5, and 6 looks quite fun, too. Good job! Selby |
||
__________________
Run-offs, chicanes, hairpins... Think you can do better? Let's see it! Check out the "My Tracks" forum here on Ten-Tenths. |
12 Mar 2011, 10:39 (Ref:2844397) | #87 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
Thanks Dan
Here's a 2.73 mile International 'B' circuit at 14.5 m wide its quite wide so plenty of passing room. Suitable for everything below F1 plus MotoGP and WSB. Direction is clockwise. |
|
|
12 Mar 2011, 16:54 (Ref:2844557) | #88 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 925
|
Ohhh you know I'm a lover of the horseshoe concept, very well executed , lot's of different options, you got me with this one!
|
|
__________________
F.I.M. Certified Race Director whowhaa!!! |
12 Mar 2011, 18:11 (Ref:2844600) | #89 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 245
|
Agreed, this is good. Plenty of passing opertunities and challenging corners. Those esses at the end remind me of my 1st track i posted which i like. Only thing you would need to add to complete it is a link to form a shorter circuit for club level racing but thats it. Well Done
|
||
|
14 Mar 2011, 09:17 (Ref:2845344) | #90 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,067
|
Quote:
Last sector looks crazy fun! Alternating kinks is a great way of keeping motorcyclists on their toes (..?). Getting the right line balanced with the right amount of throttle will be pivotol. Only change i'd suggest is making T2 slightly earlier/closer to T1. I think it could potentially open up a better overtaking op in to T3. That's just an opinion, though. Good work, again! Selby |
|||
__________________
Run-offs, chicanes, hairpins... Think you can do better? Let's see it! Check out the "My Tracks" forum here on Ten-Tenths. |
14 Mar 2011, 09:18 (Ref:2845345) | #91 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,067
|
Quote:
Selby |
|||
__________________
Run-offs, chicanes, hairpins... Think you can do better? Let's see it! Check out the "My Tracks" forum here on Ten-Tenths. |
15 Mar 2011, 09:34 (Ref:2846021) | #92 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
Another category B circuit, this one is 4.313km (2.68m) so its about the same length as Brands Hatch but much wider and a bit slower. Direction as you can work out is clockwise. No pit road worked out but it would be a simple affair entering off at the final turn and entering the circuit after turn one.
The club circuit is 1.95miles (or 3.138km) This circuit is deliberately quite compact requiring a relatively small amount of space for what is a substantial length. It sits in a natural amphitheatre where the back of the circuit is surrounded by elevated hills giving a natural view of most of the circuit. Its not dead flat but the back of the circuit turns across a rolling landscape. Last edited by Teretonga; 15 Mar 2011 at 09:49. |
|
|
15 Mar 2011, 23:12 (Ref:2846541) | #93 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 925
|
My kind of thing, very efficient, interesting, you covered most corner type I like,fast , slow,hairpin, not really for winged vehicles, I don't see downforce playing much here but definitely suspension and tire setup are required here.Motorcycles would have a blast here, this is the kind of project I like to talk about.
|
|
__________________
F.I.M. Certified Race Director whowhaa!!! |
16 Mar 2011, 21:04 (Ref:2847099) | #94 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,101
|
The club circuit is amazing! Thank you. If my ficticious Other World(ly) Series would still "exist" and its cars weren't modelled on IndyCar, I'd ask you for permission to run on your club circuit for a race weekend.
I think it's so good that the sight of it would be enough for star drivers to want to get their private Formula Ford cars out of their garages and have a go just for fun ;-) |
|
|
2 Apr 2011, 07:13 (Ref:2857202) | #95 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
bad post
|
|
|
2 Apr 2011, 07:18 (Ref:2857205) | #96 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
Heres Athena, a clockwise 3.555mile (5.72km) international circuit with a 2.6mile national circuit incorporated. Width is 14.5m.
|
|
|
2 Apr 2011, 20:41 (Ref:2857511) | #97 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,101
|
How about closing the loop of an additional tri-oval at the back of the paddock and adapting track length and dimensions accordingly? I feel that would give this circuit something special, and I hope you like the idea.
|
|
|
3 Apr 2011, 08:40 (Ref:2857663) | #98 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
Quote:
That is a variation I had not considered when drawing this up so I may rework the design and come up with a trioval as the basis with the road course based on a series of extensions |
||
|
3 Apr 2011, 23:07 (Ref:2858288) | #99 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2008
Posts: 925
|
That's a good , raceable track, those curves must be huge!
I thinks you have plenty of space inside the main track to do some technical loops, do you? |
|
__________________
F.I.M. Certified Race Director whowhaa!!! |
4 Apr 2011, 10:17 (Ref:2858474) | #100 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 4,399
|
Ok Here is a 3.314 mile track with optional tri-oval (1.25m) and a short course of 2.3 miles.
The east side of the track is long flowing corners across rolling landscape, a bit like Mid-Ohio. The west side is more technical. The tri-oval is not like a traditional NASCAR oval. It is wide but has hard run-off areas a bit like Bernies track at Le Castellet, with sandtraps beyond that. So there are no trackside walls to hit. There is also a test centre optional area on the back straight with garages and a hard off track area for servicing. There is another feature of the track but I can't remember what it is. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The "4 New Tracks A Month" Movement (a desperate attempt to revive My Tracks) | bio | My Track Designs | 36 | 8 Apr 2015 02:55 |
[NZV808R6] Teretonga Park - NZV8 Championship decider | NAC | Australasian Touring Cars. | 34 | 15 Mar 2008 05:08 |
Teretonga & Levels | Tony_ | Australasian Touring Cars. | 2 | 5 Jun 2007 07:36 |
My Tracks | mac | My Track Designs | 7573 | 23 Feb 2005 15:53 |
Teretonga races, Invercargill | speedreader | Australasian Touring Cars. | 23 | 15 Feb 2005 05:31 |