![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
#1 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
![]() ![]() |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,261
![]() |
Sarcasm doesn't compute well....
|
||
![]() |
__________________
MBL - SpeedyMouse Race House ![]() |
![]() |
#3 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,460
![]() |
i've read some time ago that from 2014 and on, the lmp1 class will be reserved only for coupè cars, most of these will be cars of manufacter's work teams. The min. weigth should be decreased to 700kg, while the hybrid engines won't be mandatory but surely all manufacters will focus on that. The engine specs should remain the same of the actual ones but surely the diesel engines will be obsolete or banned at all. The lmp2 class should not have too much changings.
I've read too that should come back a sort of groupC spirit: there will be a determined amount liters of fuel that each car can use during the race, in this way each team may use different strategies like choice between more power but higher consumaption or less power but lower consumaption. I'm happy about this because finally endurance races will come back to be endurance races and not anymore endless sprint races as happens now. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
![]() ![]() |
Oh, ok. I wasn't sure if you were kidding or if you were suffering from temporary insanity so I chose the "nicer" answer! So who wants to Photoshop a Dallara DP with Big Honkin' Holes and a Big Honkin' Fin? Ok, nobody, but you could be looking at the future of sports car racing!
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,460
![]() |
but lmp1 IS still now the class of manufacters! in the last 10 years only work teams have won the 24h of le mans and almost all the other intersting events, and when the manufacters have taken part to some champ (ALMS, LMS) then they won flawless also there!
if those rumors will be true, it will happens as happens now: the team works will be however faster and more competitive than the private lmp1 teams. Beyond competitivity between manufacters/private, i just hope that at least 3 manufacters will fight each other in lmp1, just to avoid what happened during the beginning of '2000 where after the toyota, mercedes, bmw, nissan and porsche retirment, there was a sort of "medieval age" where audi with the r8 that was undefeatable against other little teams who were using old or poorly updated courage or dallara cars. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
|
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,460
![]() |
well... these teams will run in lmp2, or maybe will lease a car from a manufacter.
About ALMS, the champ has already an eye focused on bio-fuel question, IMSA is not forced to use ACO/FIA rules. In my opinion the ALMS will disappear in next years when FLM will finish the homologation and just a couple of prototypes will sign in... for sure will become a GT champ (a sort of IMSA GT) or maybe will join with the GRAND-AM in some way. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
![]() ![]() ![]() |
In 2014 chassis will be a development of current cars, everyone from Wirth to OAK have a coupe on the drawing board, some, as in the former, may end up badged by manufactuers.
What will be at a premium will be manufactuer developed engines, hence De Chaunac's proposal for manufactuers to supply them ala F1, Honda, Toyota and Nissan* are in the market, we'll have to see what happens with AER/Mazda, likewise if Judd link-up with a manufactuer. If the likes of Peugeot, who back De Chaunac's proposal, start supplying engines, that will be a huge benefit for the sport. Together with engines you'll need a hybrid system, fortunately this is one area specialist manufactuers are leading the field (well, until we see what manufactuers have), and companies like Zytek, Williams and Flybrid will be wanting a return on their investment by selling systems to customers. http://www.lemans.org/en/races/fia-w...oice_5770.html *P1 version via Zytek must be on the cards? |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 10,500
![]() ![]() ![]() |
The new cars are still on the hard drives, well, because they are for 2014, current HPD's and OAK's still look pretty good, I think OAK have suprised everyone with the development of the car, and pushing ahead with new customers.
On the hybrid side Zytek's latest system has yet to get a decent run, I think they are also working with Super, and no doubt others, while the Flybrid system has worked well for Porsche. I don't know how things worked in the past but it seems the ACO work closely with all the main players years in advance of a new car hitting the track, perhaps we should stop being suprised when a flood of announcements come forth. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 2,261
![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Quote:
Hope = hopeful for money Quote:
|
||||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,460
![]() |
for manufacters like mercedes not involved in LMS/ALMS/WEC a sort of engine supplying is possible only as "recycle" of engines planned and developed from other competitions, as happnede this year with the RV8LM toyota or VK45 nissan sgt500 engines. Is really hard to think that a manufacter will project and develope a brand new engine just to selling it to private teams! A think like this can be done just by zytek or judd who are companies that have their main business in this.
Then a situation like the early '90 where f1 engines were shared by prototypes (because there was not groupC anymore) is impossible now. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Perhaps I misunderstood, but I was under the impression that your point was that they were the same entity.
Anyway, as I have mentioned before, there will be technology and platform sharing for some projects (road going) when they make sense and are beneficial to both companies and the Group. For information purposes, it is important to clarify that the Porsche -VAG deal involves Porsche SE and not directly Porsche AG (the actual car manufacturer). "The Porsche Automobile Holding SE is responsible for the stock of the operating subsidiary, Dr. Ing. h.c. F. Porsche AG, and for the investments in Volkswagen AG. With the new structure, Porsche ensures that the autonomy and independence of the traditional Stuttgart-based company remain fully protected. This is the main purpose of separating holding and operating activities. At the same time, the holding also represents a single company responsible for the management of stock."- Porsche |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 931
![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Apart from the racing side of things being separate entities from the manufacturing and sales of their cars, what about the two Porsche employees who are in the inner sanctum of Audi racing at the moment, ie, Messrs Bernhard and Dumas. Surely they must be sharing some of their knowledge with their primary employer, and I am not suggesting anything underhanded, just a sharing of the know-how between the fellow VAG team mates. Even with Audi's talk of their future plans, I hold the belief that they will be leaving LMP racing before Porsche return in 2014. |
|||
![]() |
__________________
Go the mighty Flying Lizards "A good way to gauge the strength of your argument is to weight the quality of the rebuttals. Strong arguments have low quality rebuttals." David Heinemeier Hansson ![]() |
![]() |
#15 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
My apologies if my explanation is confusing, but a look at the current holding structure (my next post) should make it less so. Bernhard and Dumas are being loaned by Porsche to Audi at the request of Audi and the drivers. Secondly : it is not like Porsche has absolutely no know-how in LMP racing. Not that long ago, their LMP2 was giving the LMP1's (Diesels) something to think about on the short circuits. It is also rumored that Porsche let the Audi engineers have a "good look" around their aborted LM2000 car before Audi developed their R8 as part of the agreement for VAG co-developing the Cayenne, This took place way before the Porsche-VAG tie in. Those that know Porsche and its history, will know that there has always been strong ties and deals with VAG. ( shared parts on the 356, Porsche 914, Cayenne, the Porsche+Audi American commercial deal, etc) Also - When it was agreed that Dumas and Bernhard be loaned to Audi, there were no plans for a Porsche LMP1 entry. Finally, I suspect the 2014 rules may render much of their "gained" know how obsolete. There are always drivers changing teams in racing. This is nothing new. Last edited by Spyderman; 11 Dec 2011 at 04:57. |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
However you are right with Audi Porsche sharing many ties, and the LMP / SUV deal is a good example on (almost) "in-house" regulation. The Joest team is also a strong tie in between Audi and Porsche, and none the less Tom and Allan who secured Porsche it's last two overall victories at Le Mans. But again so much depends which team Porsche choses (or not) to collaborate with, if they will use a manufacture for the chassis (Dallara!?), Drivers and so on. I do not see that much sharing of technology between Audi and Porsche, as they might decide to run two different technologies (Diesel and Petrol!?), to take advantage of the any regulation preferences (like some say diesel has). |
|||
![]() |
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) ![]() |
![]() |
#17 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,353
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
My point had nothing to do with the road cars its was about the P1 projects. It makes no sense for them not to share some costs collectively until the point comes where the designs diverge to represent their respective brands. This could apply in manufacturing, purchasing, marketing, operations, personnel and ultimately strategy.
It remains to be seen (if we ever do - because they are unlikely to admit it) how much sharing goes on but I cant believe there will be none |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
I see this more likely with Porsche and Audi, than a cooperation. |
|||
![]() |
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) ![]() |
![]() |
#20 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
Maserati and Ferrari |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) ![]() |
![]() |
#22 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,395
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 9,024
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Harald Primat leaving Aston Martin and heading to Rebellion for 2012 according to John Dagys. Points towards the WEC programme that we all assumed Rebellion would be doing. 1 or 2 cars is the question?
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 6,654
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
A driver like Primat should be able the score a Factory seat. Could Rebellion be traning grounds for Toyota?, or Primat just REALLY upset with the Amr team?
|
||
![]() |
__________________
Hvil i Fred Allan. (Rest in Peace Allan) ![]() |
![]() |
#25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 785
![]() ![]() |
Daddy's checkbook can; and magically a new sticker will appear on the Rebellion cars. We don't really know how fast he is, but it would be widely known if he was something special or had set the world alight in lower formula. Apparently he's a nice person, but I seem to remember he's the only driver who spun/damaged? the AMR-One during its very short time on track.
Last edited by Félix; 10 Dec 2011 at 22:12. |
||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[LM24] 2014 Le Mans Entry Rumours | The Badger | 24 Heures du Mans | 47 | 30 Sep 2013 22:04 |
Rumours more rumours! | crazytrain | ChampCar World Series | 11 | 7 Oct 2002 17:06 |
[LM24] Le Mans Series and Sportscar Racer | Speedworx | 24 Heures du Mans | 20 | 6 Feb 2002 03:55 |
log-in repetition | Unregistered | Announcements and Feedback | 6 | 10 Apr 2001 17:26 |
Repetition... | Chris Y | Touring Car Racing | 6 | 20 Mar 2001 14:33 |