|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
5 May 2016, 16:09 (Ref:3638847) | #10401 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
The pace doesn't matter one way or another if they cannot fix the very apparent, quite possibly lethal reliability issues in one months time.
I don't see any problems with the on-site personnel and racing preparations itself, it's just as good as it has always been. |
|
|
5 May 2016, 16:51 (Ref:3638861) | #10402 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
i thought porsche's setup was much closer to the le mans package last yaer than it is this year. they also had a lot more top speed last year.
|
|
|
5 May 2016, 17:21 (Ref:3638872) | #10403 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
I might be a bit jaded because of looking for something to make me feel a bit happier after some stuff that's caused me anxiety the past couple of weeks, but as an Audi fan, I don't see a ton to be hopeful about right now.
|
||
|
5 May 2016, 17:30 (Ref:3638877) | #10404 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 596
|
Audi have been a mess lately. Reliability is getting worse and worse, stupid strategy calls, questionable aero packages, engine seals penalty, DNF for rule violation, etc. We may see for the first time this year an Audi LMP1 entered by Audi Sport Team Joest retiring at Le Mans with mechanical failure( I don't consider that loosing wheel in 2007 a mechanical failure). Amazing feat they have. Since 1999, 14 Le Mans 24h with a total of 40 entries and not a single retirement with mechanical failure is something amazing.
|
|
__________________
"Every Le Mans, the car which wins Le Mans is the best car." - Tom Kristensen |
5 May 2016, 17:44 (Ref:3638885) | #10405 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Well, there have been mechanical failures, just not terminal ones they couldn't fix , and usually quicker than it took someone else to do routine pitstop
But I very much agree. This will be a true trial at the 24. |
|
|
5 May 2016, 17:57 (Ref:3638890) | #10406 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
I'm starting to think that Audi fell behind the curb after LM last year and they're just as bad off by trying to leap ahead.
Unless things pick up and soon, 2016 will be for Audi what 2014 was for Porsche, a building year. Sadly, even accounting for the fact that they haven't done a ton of performance testing yet, they said that the new car was supposed to be a big leap. But I haven't seen it on track yet. Combined with the reliability issues and the fact that the car seems to be a total pain to work on, I'm not hugely hopeful right now. |
||
|
5 May 2016, 18:00 (Ref:3638892) | #10407 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
at least it's crazy ugly. i think if things keep going like this, the 2016 r18 might go down in history as the worst prototype audi sport has ever built. at least the r8c was a beauty to look at...
|
|
|
5 May 2016, 18:08 (Ref:3638895) | #10408 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,567
|
The R15 wasn't the greatest thing either. No one is immune to getting things wrong, or at least not as right as the competition. But at least they're somewhat close.
|
|
|
5 May 2016, 18:28 (Ref:3638900) | #10409 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
Close? They're almost 2 seconds off the pace. They're not much faster than Toyota or Porsche in terms of top speed, but yet are that much off the pace. If their high downforce kit is faster, they should run it even if they take a hit in top speed.
Audi better have something in reserve, because right now I can't help but think that they missed the mark. Sometimes being really advanced in terms of aero or other tech isn't always so good out of the box. |
||
|
5 May 2016, 19:02 (Ref:3638908) | #10410 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,208
|
But missing one session because of front axle issue is very worrying. This is the team that built the R8 that could change in minutes the gearbox.
|
||
|
5 May 2016, 19:06 (Ref:3638909) | #10411 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 825
|
Let's remind that, at Silverstone's Friday, Audi was massively slower than Porsche too(1.7s in FP1 and 1.8s in FP2).
How did that turn out? They trashed Porsche at a wet qualifying and were on par in the race. Maybe the LD kit don't suit Spa well and they will not be competitive this weekend but I still don't see the situation as badly as for Toyota, which still needs to prove if their TS050 have speed. I'm sure if Audi finishes 1-2 here, this end-of-the-world expectation towards Audi will quicky change for LM.... I'll wait for tomorrow's QLF and specially the race to, then, deem this car as a failure, or not. |
|
|
5 May 2016, 19:09 (Ref:3638911) | #10412 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Quote:
--- In regards to R15, at least that turtle was built to last like a tank. |
||
|
5 May 2016, 19:12 (Ref:3638913) | #10413 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
Reliability is and will always be a worry. Let's see what tomorrow brings.
|
||
|
5 May 2016, 19:12 (Ref:3638915) | #10414 | ||
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
Quote:
Pug 2010 never forget. |
||
|
5 May 2016, 19:57 (Ref:3638931) | #10415 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,240
|
well 2 bad hybrid issues in 2 race week-end isn't a lot promising.
|
|
|
5 May 2016, 21:09 (Ref:3638963) | #10416 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 362
|
I wouldn't worry just yet guys. Like Artur said, this was the same scenario as Silverstone and Audi never goes hard in FP.
I think tomorrow they will turn up the wick and we will see improved times. The biggest threat as others have stated is this new hybrid system that clearly can be volatile |
||
|
5 May 2016, 21:39 (Ref:3638976) | #10417 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,926
|
I'd like to be hopeful and I've talked to a couple of people who were there or observed practice better than I could, but the reliability issues are a bit worrying.
|
||
|
6 May 2016, 06:21 (Ref:3639049) | #10418 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,567
|
Quote:
|
||
|
6 May 2016, 07:55 (Ref:3639069) | #10419 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
Quote:
In fact I have a theory that Audi went with their very soft suspension set-up (that they had used for qualifying in the wet) into the race, and that would explain the plank wear. Quote:
The actual race is a whole different ball game. Look at what happened to the #1 with a ~ 46 second lead at Silverstone. |
||||
|
6 May 2016, 10:12 (Ref:3639114) | #10420 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
audi were claiming their lap times will be a bit faster in 2016 than in 2015, which was confirmed at the prologue and at silverstone. yet here, they are 1.5 seconds off their practice pace in 2015, still with a LD package, as in 2015. they're either sandbagging or they have a lot of work to do on this setup.
the suspension problem they had yesterday also got me wondering whether it was a suspension thing that got their ride height lower than legal in silverstone, so in a quick attempt to try and fix that, they maybe destabilized other aspects of the car's suspension, hence the failure yesterday and the overall obviously slower lap times than what they (and everyone else) anticipated. |
|
|
6 May 2016, 10:23 (Ref:3639119) | #10421 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
All competitors are currently running at a slower pace than last year. I wouldn't be surprised however if they end up doing 1:54-55s.
|
||
|
6 May 2016, 10:33 (Ref:3639123) | #10422 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
porsche expected to be slightly slower this year (not the case in silverstone because now they used the proper aero setup for the track). toyota are faster, which was expected, because last year they were completely off the pace. audi have shown nothing more than problems so far...
|
|
|
6 May 2016, 10:36 (Ref:3639124) | #10423 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 10,744
|
The only one running slower than last year at this stage of the weekend (ie FP3) is Audi. Porsche, Toyota and privateers are faster.
|
|
|
6 May 2016, 10:43 (Ref:3639125) | #10424 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 972
|
well, porsche aren't faster if you don't count the qualfiying run. they didn't do a qualifying run in practice last year.
anyway, the sector data is interesting: audi gain significant time in both sectors 1 & 3 as compared to last year (32.728 vs. 33.463 s1 & 29.957 vs. 30.412 s3) but lose a whole lot on sector 2 (55.636 vs. 53.292). it's amazing how quick their LD car was last year on sector 2. they also got more top speed now - 312 km/h vs. 309.5 km/h last year. also, aside from porsche's qualifying run, it seems the audi has the fastest sectors 1 & 3 now of all cars, they just lose too much time in sector 2. seems like a good setup for le mans though, with the massive top speed and added acceleration. Last edited by sssssssss; 6 May 2016 at 10:57. |
|
|
6 May 2016, 11:52 (Ref:3639145) | #10425 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 825
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Porsche's FP3 is still almost 2s from last years best QLF and they only had the Saturday(and Sunday, of course) of dry running, last year, which means that the 2015 pole could've been even faster. |
||||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] Porsche GTP / Hypercar: factory and customer | Simmi | North American Racing | 9284 | 18 Sep 2024 14:24 |
[WEC] Toyota LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | ACO Regulated Series | 6771 | 18 Aug 2020 09:37 |
Nissan LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5568 | 17 Feb 2016 23:22 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |
[LM24 Race] Audi LMP1 Poster all art deco'd. | blackohio | ACO Regulated Series | 2 | 27 Oct 2011 06:30 |