|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
29 Jun 2016, 15:55 (Ref:3655778) | #101 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,642
|
This is always the argument that is given whenever this is discussed. Introducing a mid-engine car above the 911 (but not a halo car) does NOT mean ending the production or sales of the 911. The 911 is a niche car and will continue to have its followers and clients.
|
||
|
29 Jun 2016, 16:13 (Ref:3655784) | #102 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,099
|
What I say below is not really news to anyone but I enjoy getting on this soapbox on occasion...
Porsche has a long history of mid-engine cars (race and road). But generally speaking they also have a long history of neutering cars within their own line up that might actually perform better than the 911. Clearly they don't with the limited production "halo" cars such as the Carrera GT and 918, but take the Boxster, Cayman and 914/6 for example. While we have recently seen special editions that can challenge 911 models from a power/performance perspective, generally speaking Porsche will always keep those models somewhat underpowered. The issue is that they are inherently a better performing design and if given equivalent engines, etc. they will always perform better than the 911. Ultimately that is also the root of my complaints about the 911 and GT racing. Why does this somewhat bug me personally? I am not just a Porsche fan, but I also have owned a few 914s (mid-engine if not familiar with the model) over the years (including one current in middle of resto/mod). And even back in the 1970's Porsche restricted the engine power of the 914/6 to keep it from challenging the 911. While 911 of that era used a 2.4L six, the 914/6 was limited to a 2.0L six. Some suspension bits were also downsized (brakes for example). Engine and suspension swaps showed that with equal equipment the 914/6 performed better. And the talk of a "Ferrari Fighter" goes back decades as well. The type 916 prototype road car was basically a 914/6 with upgraded engine, etc. and was targeting the Ferrari Dino. The 916 didn't move forward for a number of reasons, but I suspect part of it was that it would also overshadow the 911. Quote:
So the question is "Who is behind the 911 edict?" I believe that ultimately it is something that comes from the Porsche/Piech family which "do" have the extended history that goes back decades. More specifically, probably the supervisory board of Porsche Automobil Holding SE. I wish none of them ill will at all, but I suspect that until a new generation takes charge nothing is going to change with respect to the 911 being the "face" of Porsche in all respects including GT racing. Richard |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
30 Jun 2016, 03:41 (Ref:3655875) | #103 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 337
|
Ok, so ill ask again, porsche should now make all its sports cars mid engined? I think turbo charging the rear engine 911 in gte form might help a bit, but I don't see them going away from the rear engine. Might make for a more competitive gte racer (and fantastic car), but it would be too upsetting to the purists imo
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk |
||
|
30 Jun 2016, 03:46 (Ref:3655876) | #104 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 337
|
Sorry guys, didn't see the extra page of posts today before I wrote this..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk |
||
|
30 Jun 2016, 17:19 (Ref:3655980) | #105 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 363
|
That's true, the Cayman has all the potential to be a superior car to the 911, but they won't let it. Also, in terms of road cars, it has the reputation of being a lower class car than the 911.
Could they just split their top production line into the 911 and a bigger and meaner Cayman-like car that is not a Cayman? One will be an excellent everyday sports car with 2+2 seats (and the 911 is a wonderful car) that will continue to race in many series (and why not continue in GTE-AM), while the other one will be a regular production Ferrari-fighter with two seats and a mid-engine, focused on performance instead of comfort and everyday usefulness, and definitely not an entry-level Porsche like the Cayman/Boxster. Or maybe the 911 can be improved enough - who knows? Just keep moving more stuff in front of the rear axle and keep moving more stuff to the front. All that weight in the back may not be very good for handling in general, but the grip when accelerating out of a tight turn is spectacular. Still can't forget how the Dempsey Porsche made a F458 spin out at Arnage (if I remember correctly) in the 2015 LM. |
|
|
6 Jul 2016, 10:55 (Ref:3657228) | #106 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 239
|
It seems fairly certain that the new Porsche GTE will have a "more" mid engine 911 car. Thoughts on the engine? Will it be turbo or NA? Will it be the production based 9a1 engine design that is in the 991 GT3RS or will it be a completely new motorsport developed engine?
|
|
|
6 Jul 2016, 12:33 (Ref:3657242) | #107 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 555
|
It was originally thought that it might be NA as there was no mention of turbo charging and the head on photos gave no hints to the contrary. In the newest testing photos though you can clearly see the large vents going into the rear fenders that are typically associated with turbo Porsches. Turbos certainly make more sense I would think. As for the basis of the engine, i suppose that's anybody's guess.
|
|
|
6 Jul 2016, 12:35 (Ref:3657244) | #108 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 5,721
|
So long as it's not a V8. The day Porsche produces a V8 911 is the day the heavens fall in. PJ O'Rourke may have described the 911 as an "ass-engined Nazi slot car", but it's the formula. Don't mess. If I won the Lottery, my local Porsche dealer would be one of my first ports of call. After the off-licence.
|
||
|
6 Jul 2016, 12:42 (Ref:3657249) | #109 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 555
|
With ever tightening emissions standards being placed on the manufacturers I'd say you have little to worry about. How do feel about about turbo four and hybrid powered 911s though?
|
|
|
6 Jul 2016, 13:19 (Ref:3657258) | #110 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
Sportscar365's latest podcast mentions that Dagys is lead to believe it's not a turbo..
|
||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
6 Jul 2016, 14:52 (Ref:3657275) | #111 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,099
|
Quote:
Richard |
||
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
6 Jul 2016, 14:56 (Ref:3657278) | #112 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
6 Jul 2016, 15:21 (Ref:3657281) | #113 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 555
|
You're right. Even the GT3 RS has them.
|
|
|
6 Jul 2016, 18:03 (Ref:3657309) | #114 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 291
|
The video clip of it testing really does sound like a turbo though no?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAfZRBRfLXA |
|
|
6 Jul 2016, 18:28 (Ref:3657311) | #115 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 555
|
You can hear some whistling when it's breaking and downshifting but, I'm not sure that makes it a positive ID for a turbo.
|
|
|
6 Jul 2016, 19:32 (Ref:3657324) | #116 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
It's definitely got a turbo in that clip. Way more muted/lower revving than the standard N/A lump.
Compare: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5EeUqO2hySs |
||
|
6 Jul 2016, 19:39 (Ref:3657328) | #117 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 2,555
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
6 Jul 2016, 19:44 (Ref:3657332) | #118 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 555
|
It does sound a little muted to me when making the direct comparison. The whistling at the end doesn't sound particularly turbo like. We'll see.
Last edited by TRuss; 6 Jul 2016 at 19:56. |
|
|
6 Jul 2016, 19:47 (Ref:3657334) | #119 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 6,099
|
Hard to say. To me it sounds very much like the current car.
Richard (Edit: Given differences in locations, recording equipment, etc. it's hard to compare.) |
|
__________________
To paraphrase Mark Twain... "I'm sorry I wrote such a long post; I didn't have time to write a short one." |
6 Jul 2016, 19:49 (Ref:3657337) | #120 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
I've heard the current cars many times in person, it sounds like they rev out to about 9800rpm .
That new clip should be fairly high in the rev range, and it just doesn't have the punch a naturally aspirated car would. |
||
|
6 Jul 2016, 21:08 (Ref:3657352) | #121 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 8,611
|
I want it to be turbo because I fear that's the only way Porsche is going to be competitive in GTLM going forward.
|
||
__________________
Somebody asked if the McLaren F1 was going to be like the Ferrari F40, Gordon Murray replied, "I don't think so, there's no one at McLaren who can weld that badly." |
6 Jul 2016, 21:09 (Ref:3657353) | #122 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,925
|
It could be turbocharged, or it might be NA. Hard to tell by that sound clip alone. Also, it has to be remembered that the Porsche 919 LMP1 engine is turbocharged, but is also fairly high (IMO, actually pretty high) revving, since it has about an 8500rpm redline.
|
||
|
6 Jul 2016, 21:31 (Ref:3657364) | #123 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,931
|
I misunderstood or somebody was mentioned that Porsche was testing 2 cars, one turbocharged and one with aspirated engine. This may be confusing to some videos and photos without knowing that car is
|
||
|
6 Jul 2016, 23:01 (Ref:3657376) | #124 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 5,148
|
I can't understand why they would not run the turbo engine unless they were worried that it was not reliable.
|
|
|
6 Jul 2016, 23:15 (Ref:3657378) | #125 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 239
|
I agree. Am also hoping its a brand new motorsport engine. Based on comments made by Hartmut Kristen, my impression is that the 9a1 engine was not going to be raced in GTE/ACO. A new engine was going to be developed once the new technical regulations were in place (GT3 / GTE convergence). Not sure developing a production based engine (9a1) into a race engine is a good thing.
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Old Porsche 911 rallycross car value | Cromwell | Rallying & Rallycross | 26 | 16 Oct 2015 05:51 |
TRG Confirms AMR GTE Program | Beetle | Sportscar & GT Racing | 92 | 27 Jun 2013 05:04 |
New Porsche 911 Rally car | tyrrellf1 | Rallying & Rallycross | 7 | 8 Sep 2004 19:32 |
Porsche 911 RSR a brick? | Liz | Sportscar & GT Racing | 26 | 12 Mar 2004 10:40 |
Porsche 911 GT3 RSR for British GT! | SALEEN S7R | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5 | 17 Dec 2003 15:01 |