|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
16 Jul 2012, 11:19 (Ref:3107089) | #151 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 363
|
And sadly the last of those moves caused Mans to retire from the 2nd race. To finish first; first you must finish!
|
|
|
16 Jul 2012, 11:22 (Ref:3107092) | #152 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 260
|
Flavio, if you've been watching paddock hill since the '60s then I'd be very surprised if Matheo's is the first or last wheel you will see detached after a big shunt. If you're suggesting that if an F1 car went off in a similar manner it wouldn't lose a wheel then I find that surprising.
As far as Pommer's sponsor is concerned, would you rather he didn't race until he found a sponsor that better suited your socio-political views? We are all happy to have a conversation about the pros/cons of F2 as a feeder series, but wheeling out the 15 year old / sponsor cheap shots every time does nothing to progress debate. |
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 11:26 (Ref:3107096) | #153 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
You are missing the point. However talented Tuscher is, however high he climbs the ladder, the fact is the rules have been changed, or bent somewhat, to allow children to drive extremely fast racing cars with an element of risk that I personally am not comfortable with. Especially as this has been done specifically with the motive of financial gain for his managers in a "pro" series. What will you say when a less talented 15 year old is tragically killed? "He died doing what he loved"? At 15 nobody should be put in that position, which is why it is not allowed under MSA regulations. |
|||
|
16 Jul 2012, 11:28 (Ref:3107097) | #154 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
Quote:
market forces will make it irrelevant if it's not of any interest to drivers, much like fr2.0uk this season. |
||
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
16 Jul 2012, 11:41 (Ref:3107106) | #155 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
Yes, I would rather a driver could find a sponsor rather than a pornographer. You have a vested interest, I don't. So what have my political views got to do with it? I have said nothing other than a general concern for the welfare of children and a distaste of advertising which would not be allowed anywhere on TV at the time of day it is broadcast. If you want to stick up for a German pornographer exploiting young girls from his Spanish based website that is entirely your prerogative. |
|||
|
16 Jul 2012, 11:52 (Ref:3107114) | #156 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
i have no vested interest in any of this but the sponsor thing makes me uncomfortable. i think we covered that before though, in detail so let's not get into a discussion about exploitation and so on. and allowing a minor to be able to drive cars like that... well, we covered that too. it's the rules and if he wants to do it and isn't a danger to himself or others - which is the case, it seems - then so be it. it's a bit off on the moral compass side of things but as battles in motorsport go, there's far greater ones to fight.
|
|
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
16 Jul 2012, 11:59 (Ref:3107118) | #157 | |
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 363
|
I think the writing is pretty much on the wall for this championship. 16 cars with a core of only a dozen or so regular drivers is not sustainable. It only has one more season before it has to renew it's FIA status and with so many competing championships something has to give.
While in theory its a good concept it has for one reason or another lost its attraction to the top drivers. Rememeber Red Bull ran drivers here in 2009. It has become nothing more than a souped up version of FPA. I think JP could have made it a stronger series this year. Had he offered a scholarship or two he may have attracted a couple of talented, but not cash rich, young single seater stars that would have given the championship more credibility. As it is the talent pool is not that spectacular Tuscher aside. As for the debate about whether Tuscher should be there or not I like Flavio am not comfortable with it but he has I grant you demonstrated a talent beyond his years; however this may not be the case with the next 15 year old that comes along. Each driver should be assessed on their own merit. To be fair to Tuscher he did impress at the Barcelona test last December. When he moves to GP3 or FR 3.5 next season, as he undoubtedly will, then we will see how good he really is. |
|
|
16 Jul 2012, 12:29 (Ref:3107138) | #158 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,431
|
Quote:
Sam Dejonghe also crashed out of qualify to line up 21st but gave an entertaining drive for the spectators to come up to 7th. |
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 12:39 (Ref:3107147) | #159 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,589
|
I think alot of damage was done by the struggle that Andy Soucek had to get a drive in ANYTHING after taking the inaugural title. But the championship hardly had any mega-talents in it to start with....
|
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 12:48 (Ref:3107156) | #160 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
It's ironic, though perhaps not surprising, that the only driver to have made any real progress from this championship is it's 2010 runner up, a certain Jolyon Palmer! |
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 12:55 (Ref:3107158) | #161 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
Steady on Deemun or you'll have JackN back on here questioning your political credentials! |
|||
|
16 Jul 2012, 12:58 (Ref:3107159) | #162 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,431
|
And what would be the point of helping to fund drivers who want to miss out on one or two intermediate levels they need to do to learn and develop before jumping into a high-level series? Would just make it more of a farce. The series already looks like BARC Renault + from about row 4 down.
|
|
|
16 Jul 2012, 13:06 (Ref:3107164) | #163 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 363
|
Quote:
|
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 13:16 (Ref:3107169) | #164 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,589
|
The problem with the more 'cost-effective' formulae about like F2 and the BARC Formula Renault is that, and this will sound harsh, it is a massive waste of time.
If they are all you can afford, then where are you going to go from there if you do well? The fact that you are in such a series would suggest that you don't have bottomless pockets and you can pretty much forget securing meaningful external sponsorship nowadays. Look at GP2 - frequented largely by a group of very limited talent, 'my daddy's richer than yours', chinless wonders. |
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 13:57 (Ref:3107195) | #165 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
I’m Scott Malvern’s dad (oh yes him again) & I can see your point of view but I don’t agree that series such as F2 or FRBARC are a massive waste of time. It has always been a really big challenge for Scott to go racing, even in his karting days, but he has a talent for it and more importantly he enjoys it so why shouldn’t he continue to practice it? We have always had our feet very firmly planted on terra firma and know that Scott has more chance of walking on the moon than he does of making it to Formula One. We’ve always known that. But once you accept it and set yourself a different set of goals then I think the sport becomes far more of a pleasure than a pain. So Scott has been competing in BARC FR this season. Of course he would have loved to have tested himself in a higher category but circumstances dictated that it wasn’t possible. But in his view it was important to remain active and go wherever there was a drive available and in that way at least reminds people that he is still around. Where does he go next? Who knows? As we have seen with his career to date, winning and success provides no guarantee to a continuing career but if he doesn’t keep going then at least he knows it’s not due to any lack of hard work, dedication or desire on his part and he has many other skills and experience to fall back on that should ensure he makes his living from motorsport even if ultimately that isn’t as a driver. Have a good day Cheers Dominic Malvern |
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 14:12 (Ref:3107206) | #166 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,589
|
Hi Domonic,
Sorry, i could have reigned in my sweeping statement. Fair play to you. Enjoyment is key. If you have the budget available and enjoy doing it then there is nothing else left to be said. I just find it almost tragic watching some of these lads throwing every last penny at it in the belief that it is their stepping stone to Formula One stardom. But, i guess that's how all these teams survive and it creates/sustains jobs. If they want to spend the money, let them. The point i was hamfistedly getting to was that the budget leap required to progress from BARC Renault to F3, and F2 to GP2/WSR is unattainable if you are already maxed out. |
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 14:27 (Ref:3107213) | #167 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
I think you need to be realistic. As I said we know that Scott is highly unlikely to make it to F1 but that is probably true of many drivers far more well heeled than he is. But given the opportunity he would have loved to have run in F2 this season & I believe he would have done a good job and sure it may not have led to anything more but a season in a 500bhp car and driving on some top circuits would still have been fun |
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 14:27 (Ref:3107214) | #168 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 1,508
|
Quote:
Formula 2 champions anyone has not risen up to Formula One series and Soucek is not now drive anywhere when SunRed has not brought another cars according and Stoneman is moved P1 Supertock. If Luciano Bacheta to win the championship I'm not so sure that he will to move GP2 or WSR 3.5 series. |
||
__________________
“Fernando Alonso has revealed that he would like to contest the 24 Hours of Le Mans, the world’s oldest and most famous sports car race" |
16 Jul 2012, 14:42 (Ref:3107223) | #169 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
It is not "totally bad" but just catering for a different market place to GP2 or WSBR. Whether or not, as has already been pointed out, it will continue for much longer in the current climate is another matter. Now that Mosely has left the FIA I don't think that it has many allies and drivers that can afford to compete seem to prefer GP3 which puts them with the European F1 Grand Prix. But Jonathan Palmer is a shrewd business man if nothing else and I'm sure he is planning his next move. FPA served him well for 13 years all be it with it going through a make over and re-generation or two during that period but essentially it remained the same and then he sold the cars on to a race school abroad. Love him or hate him you have to admire his business acuman. |
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 16:55 (Ref:3107283) | #170 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 31
|
Any bets for Super FPA returning in 2014
|
|
|
16 Jul 2012, 17:03 (Ref:3107288) | #171 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 17:43 (Ref:3107301) | #172 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 71
|
Quote:
|
||
|
16 Jul 2012, 17:45 (Ref:3107303) | #173 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,137
|
FFfan makes a very, very good point. The F1 dream is impossible even for A LOT better funded drivers than Scott.
You know, if you're a super rich, you're quite probably not very stupid at the first place. Right now F1 teams behave like junior teams, they give the rides to the highest bidder. They can't be bothered to find sponsorship or properly cut their costs, but they just find it easy to get another Maldonado, Senna, Perez, Petrov or Pic. So, when Joe Rich gets the proposal for F3, GP3 or GP2, he looks at it also from the parent's perspective and the perspective of a very good businessman. He's asked to pay a huge sum of money for junior to race and even if he's successful, he'll still have to pay in F1 for many years. So, you spend some 8-10mln until junior gets prepared for F1 and then you need to spend at least that much for every year in F1! In other words he would need to spend at least 20-25mln EU(if you put interests it's like 30+) for junior until he goes properly professional and earns 2-3mln salary! Then you read the papers with Ferrari laughing out claims for Alonso's salary, McLaren trying to lower down Hamilton's salary and you start realizing that unless your kid is not only capable of being in F1, but also capable of being a freaking F1 legend superstar, you got no chance of ever returning this huge investment! Moreover, if your kid fails to stay in F1, he'll need to pay to race almost everything else or being lowly paid to race LMP/GT and you will still need to support him to have the life he's used to have. I can tell you, this reasoning is behind the sporadic appearances or even all together pulling out of racing for quite a few kids with the funding to go all the way to GP2 and even F1. Basically right now, you need a father or supporter who is just happy for you to be in F1, no matter what is the cost and more importantly - no matter if you'll ever return anything of this huge investment and start living w/o needing his support. There aren't many such rich ppl Compare the situation with 15-20 years ago and it's the total contrast. I remember Berger was paid $20mln to race for Ferrari, then Schumacher $25mln and others know much, much better how much was spend on their careers up to F1. Even Alesi was paid $8mln at the end of his career by Sauber. Just put together top karting + FFord + F3 + F3000 in the late 80's and I bet it's less than $2mln. Back then you could run a mid grid team with the amount of sponsorship brought by guys like Senna, Petrov or Pic. With Maldonado you'll be a title contender! |
|
|
16 Jul 2012, 19:45 (Ref:3107353) | #174 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,027
|
Quote:
I did support the modern F2 from the start but it's now simply not what it could have been. I think some of that is snobbery amongst drivers or parents that would rather be in a dedicated "Team", some of it mistakes made by the promoter, some of it the economic environment but mostly that they have been outmanoeuvred by GP3. None of that is the fault of the drivers though and I wish them all well. |
|||
|
16 Jul 2012, 21:11 (Ref:3107385) | #175 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 280
|
Quote:
Maybe because F2 still existed then in other parts of the world such as Japan. But in IMO is all it did was confuse the public. People understood the ladder. Drivers climbed up from FF1600 usually to gain their first taste of S&W's in FF2000 & then if they were good enough F3, F2 & F1. Very easy to understand! Try selling today's model to a potential partner! You need to strat with a Flowchart & a complicated one at that!! But what do I know? I'm just a grumpy old man!! |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
2012 season | simon drabble | Historic Racing Today | 23 | 8 Oct 2011 17:54 |
FIA F2 2011 discussion | TalkToFrank | National & International Single Seaters | 463 | 24 Aug 2011 19:12 |
FIA F2 2010 season discussion | jondownunder | National & International Single Seaters | 500 | 23 Sep 2010 14:08 |
Jim Russell Championship Series, FIA F2, musings on the future of F3 | duke_toaster | National & International Single Seaters | 10 | 28 Oct 2009 22:27 |
CSCC Support for FIA F2 - Donington 15th/16th August | NiG_21 | Historic Racing Today | 11 | 23 Aug 2009 17:09 |