|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 Jun 2011, 03:39 (Ref:2902666) | #51 | |
Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 132
|
This is a bigger problem than people seem to realize. I actually live in a place where F1 is broadcasted by payTV. 2 consequences:
1 - Only the hard core, addicted fans will pay for it - so, the TV station realizes this quite clearly and ends up doing absolutelly no effort in turning the transmission more pleasant. The result? We've got a deadpan commentator who they don't even send to the location. he is alone sitting on a studio receiving the world feed and he could be transmitting the Royal Wedding that would be the same. Before (for some 10 years now) the public station broadcasted F1 on the main channel at Sundays afternoon with all the ocasional audience that means; it was the only alternative sport (meaning other than football) to get that honour (basketball, tennis, etc would go and still go to our "BBC 2" or "BBC 4") 2 - There's no new fans. F1 has that amazing hability of grabbing people and turn them into fans. No way that hapenning outside a public broadcaster. From an alternative sport with reasonable audience, has turned into a niche sport with an audience increasingly smaller until eventually we all die. Enjoy it while you can. |
|
|
21 Jun 2011, 05:38 (Ref:2902688) | #52 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,456
|
Above mentioned HD channels (+NHK World HD) are Free-To-Air TV on Astra 2 satelite at 28.2° east. Plus a galore of free SD channels including all the regional BBC ones. At http://www.lyngsat.com/28east.html you can find an overview of all Sat channels at above mentioned Satposition but note that at the bottom of the page there is a colour code which indicates free-to-air and encrypted channels.
All free-to-air SD channels are possible to watch using a simple SD receiver plus universal lnb. For free-to-air HD channels a simple HD receiver such as the Comag SL40HD (it does SD too) is enough in combination with an universal lnb, of course. |
|
__________________
The advantage of cleverness is that you can play dumb. The opposite is way tougher - Kurt Tucholsky Just because you're breathing, doesn't mean you're alive - Steve 'Stavros' Parrish |
21 Jun 2011, 07:28 (Ref:2902708) | #53 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,651
|
Quote:
I understand that, when I was a youngster, BBC1 was the 'main' BBC TV Channel, and BBC2 was the minority channel, as for a short time, BBC1 was available on the old 405 lines system, but BBC2 was only available on the new 625 lines system, meaning a new TV to be able to watch it. Now that the analogue TV signal is being switched off, making all British TV reception digital, everyone who can receive the signal will be able to receive ALL of the BBC stations. In that case, why is it still considered important which one of these channels shows which program? |
|||
__________________
Incognito: An Italian phrase meaning Nice Gearchange! |
21 Jun 2011, 10:33 (Ref:2902785) | #54 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,222
|
Quote:
The fact you have to pay a licence fee means it costs to watch TV in the UK, though in the case of the BBC and ITV there is no additional cost to the viewer, which I think is what you are saying. |
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
21 Jun 2011, 10:56 (Ref:2902793) | #55 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
As Andy outlined, there is no subscription, it is just equipment costs. Freeview HD boxes costs around 50 quid these days. Most Freesat gear these days is HD.
Quote:
[EXTREMELY_ANAL]And Channel 4 and Channel 5, plus the plethora of pap on the other Freeview and Freesat channels.[/EXTREMELY_ANAL] Last edited by duke_toaster; 21 Jun 2011 at 11:02. |
|||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 Jun 2011, 11:41 (Ref:2902810) | #56 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
Quote:
it's services like iplayer (the bbc were pioneers of that really weren't they) that people easily forget too. that's one of the high points of the bbc's service. |
||
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
21 Jun 2011, 11:57 (Ref:2902824) | #57 | |||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 23,222
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"If you're not winning you're not trying." Colin Chapman. |
21 Jun 2011, 12:19 (Ref:2902842) | #58 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 930
|
Quote:
From my point of view if it were to go to Sky Sports, I simply cannot justify the cost at this time. I'm a fan of 30 years and although it has it's problems at the moment I still watch it. Times are hard at present economically and the arrival of my daughter last year has pulled finances even tighter. When I recently added up the monthly cost of having a child and took into account my reduced pay packet (no bonus' and a paycut) my wife's reduced income (now working part time) and the general increases in just about everything, I was shocked at how much our disposable income has gone down. We still have a fair bit of head room but cannot justify another £20 plus possible pay per view charges every month. Having said all that we've still got the coverage until 2013 and I think this is going to rumble on for the majority of that period. Who knows what will be the eventual outcome, sadly the view of the fans (arguable the people who make the sport what it is) will be completely irrelevant. I'm sure Murdoch will gain some sort of foothold/control as I think he's been agitating for a while now. The only positive I can see at the moment is that some of the old guard may be moved on and some of the constant bickering and politics may be finally put to bed. Maybe that's too much to expect and who knows where we will be come 2014. As Louis says enjoy it while you can. |
|||
|
21 Jun 2011, 12:31 (Ref:2902847) | #59 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 1998
Posts: 16,760
|
Quote:
how much more does it cost the bbc to have radio rights as well as tv rights? also worth remembering that we sell our coverage on to other countries, and the radio coverage is used by the fanvision screens, isn't it? so it's not that they spend all that money on the rights and get no return at all. |
||
__________________
devils advocate in-chief and professional arguer of both sides |
21 Jun 2011, 13:07 (Ref:2902867) | #60 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,126
|
I don't think iPlayer uses Kontiki any more - just streaming - although could be wrong.
|
||
__________________
Locost #54 Boldly Leaping where no car has gone before. And then being T-boned. Damn. Survivor of the 2008 2CV 24h!! 2 engines, one accident, 76mph and rain. |
21 Jun 2011, 13:16 (Ref:2902874) | #61 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 5,100
|
|||
__________________
Marbot : "Ironically, the main difference between a Red Bull and a Virgin is that Red Bull can make parts of its car smaller and floppier." |
21 Jun 2011, 14:46 (Ref:2902915) | #62 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,354
|
Kontiki is peer to peer and was removed when iPlayer abandoned P2P some years ago. Now downloaded programs come straight from the BBC servers (or some ISP cache en route but that's not an issue).
Kontiki was dire and while it was in use I did not download using iPlayer. The new version of iPlayer however is really good. Last edited by fourWheelDrift; 21 Jun 2011 at 14:47. Reason: Could have been misuderstood, now clearer! |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
BBC may drop F1 in economy drive? | Paradise City | Formula One | 102 | 16 Mar 2011 01:15 |
[TV] BBC F1 team | Monkfish | Armchair Enthusiast | 192 | 15 Nov 2009 01:08 |
F1 on the BBC | alfaman | Formula One | 55 | 16 Aug 2005 21:26 |
When F1 was on the BBC.... | Raven | Formula One | 56 | 24 Feb 2005 13:26 |
Nine to drop F1 (australia) | Champ69 | Formula One | 15 | 22 Sep 2002 06:36 |