|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
21 Mar 2016, 17:46 (Ref:3625637) | #1 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
__________________
Probae esti in segetem sunt deteriorem datae fruges, tamen ipsae suaptae enitent |
21 Mar 2016, 18:26 (Ref:3625656) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 1,864
|
IMSA needs to bite the bullet and give up the requirement to have the altered bodywork in order to use a different engine from the spec P2 unit. It's the single biggest problem with the DPi concept.
|
||
|
21 Mar 2016, 20:39 (Ref:3625710) | #3 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 12,060
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
"Knowing that it's in you and you never let it out Is worse than blowing any engine or any wreck you'll ever have." -Mike Cooley |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
IMSA DPi/P2 vs WEC LMP1-L | Danathar | Sportscar & GT Racing | 7 | 5 Nov 2015 17:55 |
New Rules - Discussion | DKGandBH | Formula One | 28 | 19 Jan 2005 01:40 |