|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
16 Jun 2019, 15:29 (Ref:3912207) | #1851 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
Next year might be the last chance anytime very soon to break the distance record. LMP1 hypercars might get slowed to like 3:25 or 3:30 for all we know right now.
|
||
__________________
Power to me is having the ability to make a change in a positive way. Don't dream it, be it. |
16 Jun 2019, 15:52 (Ref:3912210) | #1852 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,933
|
https://sportscar365.com/lemans/wec/...-sensor-issue/
Quote:
|
||
|
16 Jun 2019, 16:38 (Ref:3912216) | #1853 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,179
|
I lost the finish of the race because a huge energy cut.
Damn bad luck for the #7, they deserve the victory, last time I saw the chart they had an entire lap of advantage. Great to see SMP on the podium. |
||
|
16 Jun 2019, 16:49 (Ref:3912219) | #1854 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,179
|
I think the same, why they didnt change all tires as Audi did?.
|
||
|
16 Jun 2019, 17:03 (Ref:3912221) | #1855 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 596
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
"Every Le Mans, the car which wins Le Mans is the best car." - Tom Kristensen |
16 Jun 2019, 18:23 (Ref:3912236) | #1856 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,592
|
Final update of
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
16 Jun 2019, 18:43 (Ref:3912238) | #1857 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,179
|
Great graphics Adam, thanks for your work.
|
||
|
16 Jun 2019, 19:08 (Ref:3912245) | #1858 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Well I'll be rooting for the Conway Kobayashi Lopez trio next season, hopefully they get their due. Was an interesting race, not the best Le Mans but the finish was... interesting I guess. GTE victory for Ferrari was unexpected to me, but anyone besides Porsche is good imo.
|
|
|
16 Jun 2019, 19:32 (Ref:3912251) | #1859 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 1,157
|
Quote:
And that actually brings me to my current gripe about the EoT. Right now Toyota are quicker and have longer stint length. That pretty much guarantees their domination. Take one of those advantages away then we could have something interesting in LMP1 next season. |
||
|
16 Jun 2019, 19:44 (Ref:3912254) | #1860 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 1,920
|
Quote:
Agree, by now there is about a second, or even less in qualifying best overall performance and an average 1.5-2s in race pace; sometimes SMP was even faster than toyota to be honest. Anyway fuel tank bop or eot is made to let toyota win... toyotas had 11 laps stint lenght, SMP and rebellion 10 laps.... just this difference means SMP and rebellion can't match toyotas. |
||
|
16 Jun 2019, 19:54 (Ref:3912255) | #1861 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,933
|
Quote:
|
||
|
16 Jun 2019, 19:55 (Ref:3912256) | #1862 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,592
|
Quote:
365 #7 pits (after 11 lap stint) with 2m11s lead 366 #8 pits (after 10 lap stint) and #7 lead extends to 2m17s 367 #7 pits with 2m17s lead. Estimated loses 30s in stop and rest driving slowly back round. 368 #8 passes #7 for lead as #7 pulls in pits. 10s lead by finish line 369 while #7 in pits #8 pulls out 50 more seconds. The stint before the ones mentioned before #7 had done a 6 lap stint and #8 a 11 laps stint. This meant 7 stopped before 8, whereas it had been the other way round for the whole race. Can anyone remember why? Last edited by Adam43; 16 Jun 2019 at 20:29. Reason: checked and added chart |
|||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
16 Jun 2019, 20:02 (Ref:3912259) | #1863 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 1,179
|
The sensor that got mixed with another tire sensor, it was a tire pressure sensor right? So, they have been reading the wrong pressure all race?
|
||
|
16 Jun 2019, 20:16 (Ref:3912266) | #1864 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 596
|
The biggest problem privateers have always had against factory teams is reliability. In this race it wasn't different.
|
|
__________________
"Every Le Mans, the car which wins Le Mans is the best car." - Tom Kristensen |
16 Jun 2019, 20:20 (Ref:3912269) | #1865 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,933
|
Quote:
Depending on how they allocate sensors to wheels, it could be they have had the wrong pressure all race (but they would have noticed - fronts and rears generally aren't the same pressure), or it occurred because someone mistakenly allocated the sensors wrongly. So Sensor A was put in Sensor Bs position when preparing the tyres. When you think about the logistics of what happened it gets confusing. They pitted the second time after they discovered the puncture was still on the car. But how did they know it was right rear at that point? All they knew was the sensor wasn't where it was meant to be? So couldn't it have been left front? They (appear) to have had 2 sensors swapped around, but it could've been that whole set that was wrong. In a way they were unlucky to have this problem, but were lucky the second stop fixed it. Or they could've changed the full set - they had time. |
||
|
16 Jun 2019, 21:16 (Ref:3912289) | #1866 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 596
|
After the first stop to change the tyre, Lopez immediately slowed down just past Tetre Rouge, then crawled back to the pit. That means they took approximately 35s to realise they still had a puncture.
I just wonder if he needed to go that slow around the whole track with that puncture. It's unbelievable that the #7 lost its race this way. |
|
__________________
"Every Le Mans, the car which wins Le Mans is the best car." - Tom Kristensen |
16 Jun 2019, 23:10 (Ref:3912318) | #1867 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 372
|
I know bf1 (the TPMS provider to most teams) was at least developing a srnsor package that auto detected the position on the car to avoid this kind of error but perhaps it had yet to be integrated. These silly mistakes really can cost a team big.
|
|
|
17 Jun 2019, 00:49 (Ref:3912338) | #1868 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 18,396
|
An interesting rather than exciting Le Mans, at least up fromt. The GTs once again provided the main action
Bad luck for the No 7 crew, they had done so well, then had it snatched for the. But the No 8 deserved to win and it’s nice to see them win the title Kolles, seems they need to rethink over the winter So the Super Season comes to an end, with worthy champs in each class. Have to say though I’m still not convinced of this super season idea |
|
__________________
He who dares wins! He who hesitates is lost! |
17 Jun 2019, 01:32 (Ref:3912342) | #1869 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,955
|
Quote:
|
||
|
17 Jun 2019, 09:45 (Ref:3912388) | #1870 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,442
|
Frankly I think Toyota should have instructed the #8 to let the #7 back past.
|
||
__________________
I like taking pictures of cars going round tracks, through forests and up hills. |
17 Jun 2019, 09:50 (Ref:3912391) | #1871 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
|
||
|
17 Jun 2019, 09:57 (Ref:3912392) | #1872 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,933
|
||
|
17 Jun 2019, 10:13 (Ref:3912395) | #1873 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,182
|
|||
__________________
Let's make better mistakes tomorrow! |
17 Jun 2019, 10:15 (Ref:3912396) | #1874 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 1,442
|
The #7 was the better team. They had enough of a lead to cover the initial pitstop for the puncture, which shows how well ahead they were. The #8 would still have been world champions. Toyota would still have a 1-2 and would have delivered two different Le Mans winning teams in consecutive years. The #7 team deserved the win and deserved to have something to show for the season, rather than nothing at all.
I wouldn't argue any of that if the engine had gone, if a lapped car had pitched them into a barrier, if a tire had exploded or if one of the drivers had made a mistake. But a sensor? That doesn't feel like a case of "Le Mans decides". I'm drawing an entirely arbitrary line there and coming down on one side of it because of what I think would have been the morally correct result. You could also counter that the problem wasn't the sensor, it was not changing all four tires, which is another example of why Toyota will never be to Le Mans what Audi was. There you go. I've argued for and against myself in two paragraphs. Last edited by Anyopenroad; 17 Jun 2019 at 10:16. Reason: typo |
||
__________________
I like taking pictures of cars going round tracks, through forests and up hills. |
17 Jun 2019, 10:26 (Ref:3912400) | #1875 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,933
|
Sometimes the better team doesn't win. That's endurance racing.
I'd like to hear more about this "sensor error" because a sensor in 1 corner in 1 wheel does not accidentally report the data from another wheel (because it can't sense that). If they thought the sensors were on different corners then it sounds like a human error when preparing tyres. #7 had the speed to have a larger gap, and they chose not to extend the gap. Why did it not get itself a lap ahead? Why did they not change all 4 tyres in the pit stop? Why did the sensor report it was on a different corner? Why did they then change only 2 tyres in the next stop? The #7 lost due to a series of bad decisions. That isn't the better team IMO - it's the faster car, but they didn't do a better job. |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
[WEC] 2018-2019 WEC Super Season | hondafan37 | ACO Regulated Series | 2143 | 11 Jun 2019 19:03 |
2019 WEC 6 Hours of Spa presented by Total Race Weekend Thread | chernaudi | ACO Regulated Series | 166 | 16 May 2019 13:01 |
ACO/FIA WEC 1000 Miles (or 8 Hours) of Sebring | chernaudi | ACO Regulated Series | 190 | 29 Mar 2019 23:34 |
[WEC Race] 2016 FIA WEC 6 Hours of Circuit of the Americas aka Lone Star Le Mans | Ephaeton | ACO Regulated Series | 267 | 19 Sep 2016 11:50 |
WEC round 8: Six Hours of Bahrain---WEC season finale. | chernaudi | ACO Regulated Series | 212 | 23 Nov 2015 22:17 |