|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
26 Aug 2006, 17:18 (Ref:1692925) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 765
|
Photo 'problem'
Hi guys/girls. I have been taking photos for a while now and have a quick question that I am hoping someone has the answer to. Often (especially at Brands) I find that my photos are coming out with a very dark background yet the subject in the photo is at the correct brightness. I noticed it alot in my photos from Brands today, out on the GP loop my background (trees) were coming out very dark. What can I tweak camera settings wise to ensure that both my backgrounds and subject are coming out at the correct levels?
Anyone able to help!? |
||
|
26 Aug 2006, 17:34 (Ref:1692942) | #2 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,143
|
If you are using an SLR it will almost certainly be the weighting of your on board light meter, it sounds like you have it set to spot or centre weighted, try full matrix or whatever your manufacturers equivalent is.
|
||
|
26 Aug 2006, 17:43 (Ref:1692948) | #3 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 765
|
Quote:
Thanks again for your help. |
|||
|
26 Aug 2006, 18:16 (Ref:1692957) | #4 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,143
|
I normally find it's worse with light coloured cars, even with centre weighted I have problems.
Depending on the conditions, for instance if it's very dull, I sometimes go for manual exposures relying on my old Weston Meter. |
||
|
27 Aug 2006, 12:02 (Ref:1693515) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 256
|
Shoot fully manual and you can expose the shot how you want it.
|
||
__________________
I do a bit of motorsport photography every now and then... Google "AE Photography" :) |
27 Aug 2006, 14:14 (Ref:1693777) | #6 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 181
|
Quote:
If it were me and the subject is correctly exposed, I wouldn't worry too much about the background - you've got the important bit as right as it's going to be. If you try to expose for the background, won't the car end up being over exposed? I don't see how changing the on-camera exposure algorithm will help overall. The alternative is to use PS to selectively fiddle with levels on different areas of the pic. |
|||
__________________
"If something's worth doing, it's worth over doing", Justin Hawkins |
28 Aug 2006, 11:56 (Ref:1694910) | #7 | |
Registered User
Racer
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 342
|
do the cars have their headlights on by any chance? or is the sun reflecting off the car and into your lens?
can you post an example? what camera are you using? |
|
|
29 Aug 2006, 20:10 (Ref:1697046) | #8 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,744
|
i'm pondering why you want to see the trees...?
|
|
__________________
I want you to drive flat out |
29 Aug 2006, 21:10 (Ref:1697097) | #9 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,744
|
i'm coming back to this thread as the original post intrigues me. i'm guessing the trees in the background are in shade due to perhaps the position of the sun or those green leave shaped objects at the top of the trees blocking aforementioned sun out.
so either you or your camera have correctly exposed for what you want to be correctly exposed - the car, and the background has been thrown into shadow...voila, the sports photographers holy grail, a clean dark background. now admittedly in the days of digital we're all used to the sensors finding detail when we wish it wouldn't, but always remember the mantra from the halcyon days of velvia... "expose for the highlights and let the shadows take care of themselves.." |
|
__________________
I want you to drive flat out |
30 Aug 2006, 12:15 (Ref:1697532) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 765
|
Yes I have examples. Take a look at my photos from the HSCC summer festival at Brands. They are in my gallery at www.dcb-images.co.uk. Perhaps im just being fussy with what im expecting my camera to produce. I own a Konica Minolta 5D and use a Sigma lense.
|
||
|
30 Aug 2006, 13:30 (Ref:1697594) | #11 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,143
|
They all seem very well exposed, what's the problem? The dark trees make the cars stand out better IMHO.
Excellent pics. |
||
|
30 Aug 2006, 13:36 (Ref:1697599) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 765
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
1 Sep 2006, 11:42 (Ref:1699229) | #13 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,143
|
|||
|
1 Sep 2006, 11:45 (Ref:1699231) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,767
|
Looks like the track is wet which will reflect the sun even more.
|
||
__________________
Nostagia ain't what it used to be! |
1 Sep 2006, 13:42 (Ref:1699281) | #15 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,143
|
Alan, it was dry, but there was an early evening sun towards the west. On one or two shots there is a distinct heat haze in the background.
|
||
|
1 Sep 2006, 14:38 (Ref:1699313) | #16 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,744
|
i'm guessing you realise falcemob that the camera has tried to correctly expose the entire picture to the best of its ability, unfortunately that meant trying too hard to get those spectators standing in what looks like shade, thus over exposing the track and cars in sunlight.
|
|
__________________
I want you to drive flat out |
1 Sep 2006, 18:47 (Ref:1699447) | #17 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,143
|
kdr, I know the problem, I was trying to make the point to dazbaz that my camera produced the opposite affect.
|
||
|
2 Sep 2006, 11:00 (Ref:1699990) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 2,744
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
I want you to drive flat out |
2 Sep 2006, 12:13 (Ref:1700018) | #19 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 11,143
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Your best photo (one you took yourself!!) | calcium | Motorsport Art & Photography | 526 | 8 May 2004 21:27 |
Photo | Liz | Announcements and Feedback | 5 | 2 Nov 2003 20:17 |
photo posting problem | djb | Announcements and Feedback | 1 | 16 May 2001 22:41 |