|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
9 Nov 2009, 11:08 (Ref:2578828) | #26 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 16,040
|
but why not just have them all on 4 jacks to make it easy, reduces the risk of error by both those doing the work and by those observing keep it simple
|
|
|
9 Nov 2009, 11:11 (Ref:2578830) | #27 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,137
|
|||
__________________
V8Supercars - Race cars using road car headlights, for decades ;) 'You holden VT drivers better look out, because the Ford AU is coming to get you' Glenn Seton - 1999 (The original egg on face disclaimer) :roflmao: |
9 Nov 2009, 11:18 (Ref:2578839) | #28 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,394
|
Heres an even easier rule change. Get rid of the valves that allow the jacks to be changed from 2 to 4. Plug the air line in, 4 wheels go up, simple. Leaves less room for error like we saw on the weekend.
|
|
|
9 Nov 2009, 11:49 (Ref:2578849) | #29 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 950
|
Quote:
I didn't object to the wording of the thread title or discount the text in the post. I merely responded to your request for "peoples opinions & thoughts" on the topic. We understand all to well what you were saying & what you meant, however, calling other members of the forum 'slow' isn't advancing the discussion (or your reputation)! Obviously none of us 'KNOWS' why this (or some other) rules exist. You asked for 'opinions' & 'thoughts' on the reason for the rule. Some have offered suggestions on why they think it may be. You think you know better, but we don't expect, or deserve to be belittled by the likes of you! Have you got a link to your claim that the sole 'purpose' of the rule is "to stop the car driving away."? or have you thought of asking V8SC?? I thought not! Last edited by ForumNick; 9 Nov 2009 at 11:51. Reason: sp |
||
|
9 Nov 2009, 12:09 (Ref:2578857) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 3,137
|
I asked for thoughts on should the rule be changed, nothing to do with the reason for the rule (as i already know the answer to that)
Also I couldn't care what 'rep' I have. I speak my mind, and that usually offends people who don't like hearing the truth. Comes with the territory Also, you still didn't answer the earthing question. Would there be a greater risk by having only 2 of the jacks down? I thought not! |
||
__________________
V8Supercars - Race cars using road car headlights, for decades ;) 'You holden VT drivers better look out, because the Ford AU is coming to get you' Glenn Seton - 1999 (The original egg on face disclaimer) :roflmao: |
9 Nov 2009, 23:58 (Ref:2579244) | #31 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 12,446
|
Stealthy, chill out mate. You titled the thread, you got answers to the title. Perhaps some people need to stop and think before hitting 'Send' rather than just posting the first thing that comes into their head.
Since you're being uncivil about it, thread closed. Everyone, please remember this is supposed to be a discussion site, not an argument site. People are allowed their own opinion however much you may disagree with it. |
||
__________________
Bill Bryson: It is no longer permitted to be stupid and slow. You must choose one or the other. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Possible refueling ban (and other stuff) | Marbot | Formula One | 40 | 19 Oct 2008 19:15 |
The ban on refueling after qualifying | Joe Machado | Formula One | 30 | 28 Feb 2003 12:46 |
Refueling ban? | Lee Janotta | ChampCar World Series | 19 | 31 Dec 2002 14:35 |
Safe refueling | Gearhead | Racing Technology | 5 | 13 Jul 2001 03:32 |
Refueling? is it good for F1 or not? | yorkie | Formula One | 6 | 12 May 2000 02:37 |