|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
17 Sep 2014, 20:57 (Ref:3454467) | #1451 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Looks like the high downforce package has the LM-spec front end, unless thats not the bodywork theyre running.
http://twitter.com/Toyota_Hybrid/sta...41208111161346 |
|
|
18 Sep 2014, 02:47 (Ref:3454546) | #1452 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
Don't know if they plan on actually using it yet, but Toyota have their LM noses on hand:
Interesting to see that they're using the splitter feet to hold the nose onto it's dolly. Also, Mulsanne Mike says that Toyota are running a front end tuning vane on the front hub/brake duct area that's quite a bit different from how Audi and Porsche have approached it. As for the nose assembly, it seems to me that Toyota are possibly pulling a 2011 Peugeot--run the full sprint package once, sprint nose goes into a dark corner, and front aero focuses on a minor variation of the LM nose. |
||
|
18 Sep 2014, 05:24 (Ref:3454568) | #1453 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2013
Posts: 2,132
|
Any noticeable change at the back ?
|
||
__________________
In order to finish first, first you have to finish |
19 Sep 2014, 07:54 (Ref:3454931) | #1455 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Toyota's PR. Interesting to hear how good the car was in the wet. Should be a great race from them.
Mike Conway may be racing more this season it seems. And possibly full time next year? Another thing to keep in mind, Wurz and Lapierre haven't driven this track before. |
|
|
19 Sep 2014, 08:00 (Ref:3454933) | #1456 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,795
|
Conway being hinted at possibly becoming a full-time driver in 2015 and a third car apparently being somewhat unlikely points at one of the drivers may leave for Nissan as rumored.
|
|
|
19 Sep 2014, 17:21 (Ref:3455151) | #1457 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
If they let someone go, itd be sad. I cant think of any driver they would drop. So I dont believe that rumor. If it does happen, Id say Sarrazin. But hes still useful as a test driver for their rally project.
|
|
|
20 Sep 2014, 21:22 (Ref:3455780) | #1458 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,998
|
Someone needs to remind Toyota how much money they have. More signs the third Le Mans entry maybe won't happen:
Quote:
Also a bit in there about Toyota drivers being approached by Nissan. |
||
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
20 Sep 2014, 21:26 (Ref:3455783) | #1459 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
Quote:
What's that one about the tortoise and the hare again? |
|||
|
20 Sep 2014, 21:47 (Ref:3455792) | #1460 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 6,133
|
Isn't this about the time where we're reminded how Toyota were clearly the harder/better/faster/stronger car, their drivers are obviously the best around and that the loss was only down to extraordinarily unfortunate circumstance and in no way the fault of TMG?
Well I'd agree with the last part at least - but sportscar racing isn't purely an RoI exercise. I bet Ulrich is pretty interested in three slow cars when one of them almost always wins... |
||
__________________
BoP is democracy for racing. |
20 Sep 2014, 22:47 (Ref:3455850) | #1461 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Theres no excuse for Toyota to not have a bigger budget but for the head company not wanting to expand it. Its almost like they should approach other areas within Toyota for budget help. If it were that easy theyd have three cars. But obviously there are people within TMC that dont agree the need to have another car. That happens within any company. They need to win the championship, that may nod more heads instead of shake them.
|
|
|
21 Sep 2014, 04:35 (Ref:3456202) | #1462 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
According to Nikkei channel,
Yoshiaki Kinosh!ta (TMG) says that they did not need to equip the sensor broken in 2014 LM24. Although the sensor on the front motor broke down, FIA said that they did not need to equip this sensor after the race. (However, FIA had said before the race that they had to equip this sensor.) http://channel.nikkei.co.jp/wec/tops...9wec_us02/756/ |
|
|
21 Sep 2014, 05:06 (Ref:3456208) | #1463 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Whoa, thats bad. Must have been a miscommunication or something, right?
|
|
|
21 Sep 2014, 05:08 (Ref:3456209) | #1464 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 4,600
|
Toyota was presuppose three sensors must be equipped.
However, only two sensors were duty. The excessive sensor broke down to the ironic thing. |
|
|
21 Sep 2014, 05:21 (Ref:3456212) | #1465 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
That truly is unfortunate. Of anything to fail it was a sensor they didnt need.
|
|
|
21 Sep 2014, 11:35 (Ref:3456272) | #1466 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 3,873
|
It's really creepy watching the on-board of the moment it happened. The car came out of Arnage, flashed its lights to tell the GT car ahead that it was coming up, and then the engine dies - and then a few seconds later, so does the camera.
|
||
|
21 Sep 2014, 12:19 (Ref:3456288) | #1467 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,998
|
Like something out of the Blair Witch Project.
|
|
__________________
For when your year runs from June to June - '11/'12/'13/'14/'15/'16/'17/'18/'19/xx/'21/'22/'23 Instagram: rsmotorsportmedia |
21 Sep 2014, 18:43 (Ref:3456372) | #1468 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
In Racer.com interview Vasselon said no further development on 2014 car (I guess he means that besides the parts that have been already designed/made/planned):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvPNboUDco4 |
|
|
21 Sep 2014, 18:48 (Ref:3456374) | #1469 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
Quote:
It is becoming easier to imagine an upcoming boardroom meeting where they pull the plug because of their own cheapskateness. Last edited by deggis; 21 Sep 2014 at 18:54. |
||
|
21 Sep 2014, 19:04 (Ref:3456378) | #1470 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 6,209
|
Quote:
|
||
|
22 Sep 2014, 02:48 (Ref:3456472) | #1471 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 283
|
Wow, the season's only half over, the competition is intense, and they've stopped working on this year's car. I wonder if it's like Indycar (specifically with Honda), where the higher ups only want to hear about the one big race, with the season championship being of low importance.
It's such a shame for the team who have put together the best car for this year. Though I suppose there's some sense in that from a marketing --if not sporting, perspective. After all, the 500 and 24hrs have and will always be the same and the winner can make a bunch of full-page ads the next day, while series built around them can change names, number of races, points system, quality/quantity of competition, cease to exist for a few years, etc... |
||
|
22 Sep 2014, 03:26 (Ref:3456477) | #1472 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
It also has to be remembered that Audi and now Porsche probably are largely in development freeze mode for the 2014 cars unless it's something they want to use on the 2015 cars, but a lot of that too is done in private testing. That's nothing unusual, even for Toyota to a degree.
Now if Audi and Porsche were likely to bring new stuff with them every race, especially if the new items are an improvement over the old, then I'd worry. The #8 Toyota at COTA for sure was competitive and should've been fighting for the win if not for the messed up tire deal and the rainstorm. I'd be more worried about the #7--that car seems to be a bit wishy washy in terms of performance, because when they've been fast, they've gotten worse tire wear and probably fuel mileage than the #8, and at COTA, they were really no where after both Audis got by it, and it just fell off the radar. |
||
|
22 Sep 2014, 05:16 (Ref:3456509) | #1473 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
That can be attributed to setup, different driving styles etc. Not a car issue. Theyre probably like for like, but the #8 crew may have more cohesive setup directions with the feedback of the drivers.
I doubt stopping development on the current car is a huge deal. Its still plenty fast enough and they just came with a new high downforce package. Looking at the stats and performance from the #8, it had the fastest lap of the race/ pole, fastest stint and highest top speed of the weekend! Should bode well for Fuji. |
|
|
22 Sep 2014, 15:21 (Ref:3456631) | #1474 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
In a way it is good that the teams stop developing the current car halfway through. With budgets being so much more important nowadays, it seems, the ongoing and expensive development wars are the chief obstacle to having more factory teams.
I can see some tweaks and such, but running basically the same car for half a season doesn't seem like such a bad idea—particularly if the car is pretty good already. Audi seems to have solved its snap-oversteer issue and is winning races; Toyota is obviously fast ... only Porsche really needs more work, and as bad as they have been, focusing everything on the all-new 2015 car makes the most sense. Audi and Toyota have every expectation of winning if their cars and drivers hold up and stay lucky. Why not focus on preparation and let development focus on next season? These teams have built good cars, now they can race them. |
|
|
23 Sep 2014, 08:36 (Ref:3456819) | #1475 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Teams press release with driver quotes. Not much joy from this race but some positives looking forward!
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Audi LMP1 Discussion | gwyllion | ACO Regulated Series | 11685 | 16 Feb 2017 10:42 |
Nissan LMP1 Discussion | Gingers4Justice | Sportscar & GT Racing | 5568 | 17 Feb 2016 23:22 |
Strakka LMP1 discussion | Pontlieue | Sportscar & GT Racing | 56 | 12 Jul 2015 19:12 |
The never ending Toyota return to Le Mans (LMP1) Saga | The Badger | ACO Regulated Series | 6844 | 8 Jan 2014 02:19 |
How about a LMP1 Pro & LMP1 Privateer class | Holt | Sportscar & GT Racing | 35 | 6 Jun 2012 13:44 |