|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
25 Sep 2003, 00:41 (Ref:729239) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,010
|
Interesting points for DP haters
Here are the dimensional bodywork specs for daytona prototypes and 2004 ACO LM prototypes:
DP Wheelbase 108-110" Length 175-180" Width 77-79" Height 41" Ground Clearance 1.5" LM Wheelbase Free Length 186" Width 80" Height 40" Ground Clearance 2" Wow I guess its that lack of 6" that makes em ugly huh? |
||
|
25 Sep 2003, 00:58 (Ref:729243) | #2 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,840
|
Basically
|
|
|
25 Sep 2003, 01:55 (Ref:729270) | #3 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 234
|
No, the stupid (for design, but good for safety) cockpit rules make them ugly.
|
||
__________________
"Sebring which - if Le Mans is the heart of our sport - is our sport's soul." -Leo Hindery |
25 Sep 2003, 02:13 (Ref:729280) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
yes the near full width roofline, and windscreen which must be as wide from top to bottom is what makes them ugly the Doran and multimatic being the absolute best, and would look good in any race format, the Fabcar which was one of the first and is doing rather well is the hideous soapbar that gets the most press and is not fun to look at, and the picchio blech! and do you have to root up a bad design withan even worse paint job spots!
if doran was the first DP out and Multimatic was its major competition perhaps these would geta better reception-even if multimatic won the opener at daytona, the terrible Brumos cars left a big black eye on many viewers. I do like them now for sure, if the cost would stay as is and the chassis rules could be had so anyone can make one (now approval of chassis and bodywork must be okayed on paper before construction and use...) maybe we will have the new greatsportscar formula, rightnow it seems (especially with certain spec components coming from competitors shops-p&m i believe) it just seems off balance. let GARRA produce and sell parts to competitors which are spec'd and let everyone with a welder and a supply of carbonfibre sheets and an oven get to work, it could be just awesome- like Formula Vee and FF is almost anyone can come and play |
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
25 Sep 2003, 02:27 (Ref:729290) | #5 | |
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 204
|
The same thing is true of people too. You can have basically the same dimensions and have one women very pretty and another butt-ugly, One could be smart and funny and the other nasty and stupid. It takes the whole package.
Maybe the Daytona prototypes have real good personalities. |
|
|
25 Sep 2003, 03:04 (Ref:729299) | #6 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,010
|
I think it would take a more artistic design and maybe the cars could look better...although they do, like i said before, look much better in person.
Strangely enough, the Fabcar is starting to grow on me, I like the Dorans, but the multimatic is losing its charm...cant wait to see the R&S, Craqwford and Chase cars! |
||
|
25 Sep 2003, 03:15 (Ref:729307) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,831
|
Absolute dimensions are one thing, proportion is another. The simple relationship of the dimensions is what translates into elegance. The ancient Greeks discovered this and came up with their explanation of it as "Golden Ratio" proportion rule.
|
|
|
25 Sep 2003, 20:03 (Ref:730086) | #8 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 256
|
Your post reminded me of an ISC study I heard about a few years ago.
They compared the on-track presence of stock cars, open wheel cars, and sports cars. The conclusion of the study was that cars with closed cockpits and simple body curves (ie. less aerodynamic trickery) were much easier for fans to follow in person and on TV. Also, the larger and simpler surface areas of stock cars and the old GTP cars offers sponsors more creativity for a unique identity and better recognition. Apparently, the open cockpit sports cars were only marginally better in on-track presence than open wheel cars. Look at the pictures and compare the old GTP type cars to a Bentley. In the old GTP days the closed cockpit cars had a much simpler body shape and offered more advertising friendly surface area. The Bentleys have a lot of swooping curves which reduces the usable advertising space. With ISC being such a marketing concious enterprise, I ask myself if they put this thought into the DP design. It sure looks like they did. http://www.grandamerican.com/photos/...260&photo=1877 http://www.grand-am.com/photos/zoom....=125&photo=766 http://www.imsaracing.net/2003/cars/...5.cfm?carnum=8 http://www.hsrrace.com/03_daytona/im...G_0307_jpg.jpg http://www.hsrrace.com/03_daytona/im...G_9465_jpg.jpg |
||
|
25 Sep 2003, 20:10 (Ref:730091) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
...So you're saying their starting point for a design wasn't a car, it was a billboard?
While I think your point is a valid one, I also think that creative design of a car's livery can overcome the limitations of the shape. And, of course, the Bentley was designed to advertise one thing only, and that was Bentley. |
||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
25 Sep 2003, 20:10 (Ref:730092) | #10 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 9,215
|
That could be, Louis...but remember..."Brownie Boy" on the front cowling of the Pilbeam was pretty prominent...and some would probably say just as ugly and obnoxious....
|
||
__________________
Finally... One American Open Wheel Series! |
25 Sep 2003, 20:13 (Ref:730096) | #11 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
Re: Interesting points for DP haters
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
25 Sep 2003, 20:25 (Ref:730105) | #12 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,241
|
Mike is right. It's all about Proportions. There's an interesting poster up in my school maths dept. about the Golden Ratio. It occurs in nature. It's roughly 1:1.6
Just taking the human body, according to this poster, your thigh is 1.6 times bigger than your lower leg, your shoulders are 1.6 times bigger than the height of your head, your legs are 1.6 times longer than your torso. By the same token, i guess the perfect sports car roof bubble would be 1.6 times longer than it is wide, 1.6 times wider than it is high, and 1.6 time wider at it's base than at the top. |
||
|
25 Sep 2003, 20:35 (Ref:730113) | #13 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 204
|
Quote:
Maybe if my passion were business I would see it more like the business types, but I doubt it because if business were my passion I would probably stick to forums discussing mergers and ratios and such. Thank goodness there are those that take the time away from their otherwise important business day in the racing industry to help try and make life simple for all the uniformed sportscar fans by exposing the errors of their ways. |
||
|
25 Sep 2003, 20:53 (Ref:730133) | #14 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
I would like to add that the title of this thread is incendiary.
No one truly hates DP's, but dislikes them and how they are meant to usurp LMP and LMGTP cars from Daytona24 and possibly anywhere else, as they have a distinct GTP flavor to them. they have grown on me, and Louis the shark i see your example of DP used was the Doran Toyota, and not the Fabcar Brumos porsche thing. the evidence presented biases the view in favor of the more pleaseant and meaniful looking DP versus the grimy pictures of the betley (the former Lista LMP was quite nice.) shades of the Oj simpsons trial and the infamous Time Magazine cover |
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
25 Sep 2003, 20:57 (Ref:730139) | #15 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 10,241
|
I don't hate them. In fact, i thought they were a good idea till i saw the rules, and the monsters that became of those rules.
They're trying to do the right thing, but they're desperately slow, and really limiting formula rules. |
||
|
25 Sep 2003, 21:05 (Ref:730154) | #16 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 12,451
|
I don't hate them. I just think they're unattractive. As mentioned above, perhaps they have nice personalities. Or large bank accounts. Or brothers.
|
||
__________________
"If we won all the time, we'd be as unpopular as Ferrari, and we want to avoid that. We enjoy being a team that everybody likes." Flavio Briatore |
26 Sep 2003, 01:04 (Ref:730307) | #17 | |||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,837
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Sep 2003, 02:03 (Ref:730354) | #18 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,010
|
Ok, I guess hate is a strong word...
I like how some are quick to point out what a horrible concept having a good space for advertising is when it is the lifeblood of the sport, not to mention the fact that GTPs, which some people praise and worship, had a similar design. |
||
|
26 Sep 2003, 02:29 (Ref:730369) | #19 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 1,618
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion |
26 Sep 2003, 02:49 (Ref:730374) | #20 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 204
|
Quote:
|
||
|
26 Sep 2003, 03:31 (Ref:730381) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
i was one of the first to protest i feel, about the GARRA move to displace a world format, after they had begun with it. Now isee what they might try to accomplish, I rather like the racing -as any racing is good, and the few attractive DP's (if we can say that iin one sentence) are the ones that have peaked my interest. Although why rear wheel covers aren't allowed by the rules i don't know, i think it might add to the advertising space and might set them apart from LMGTP, and LMP's which seems like were the cause of their creation. set them apart further i mean, as they really don't look or are built anything alike (save the Dyson tube frame R&S chassis comparos for later)
|
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
26 Sep 2003, 06:07 (Ref:730442) | #22 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,482
|
The early 80' GTP were not very nice, BTW... I can't stand the Rondeau, the Fords were ugly, and the Lancia were not a success as well, estheticaly I mean...
Just to give precisions : I don't hate G/A, I'm just more a fan of Le Mans series/FIA-GT ; most of us have nothing agaisnt G/A, so let's give up this "you hate G/A" song, which, I think, has no meaning. |
||
|
26 Sep 2003, 06:54 (Ref:730472) | #23 | |||
Team Crouton
20KPINAL
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 39,570
|
Quote:
I agree entirely. And quite frankly I'm totally fed up with the sniping that threads such as this seem to be producing. I don't hate 'em - I don't know enough about 'em to hate 'em. I know they're not what I particularly want to watch, but...... |
|||
__________________
44 days... |
26 Sep 2003, 06:55 (Ref:730473) | #24 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,347
|
Fab, I am afraid I have to disagree on the Lancia which I think was a superb looking car.
With regard to GA I have not and will not express an opinion as GA has so little exposure over here that I really know nothing about it. |
||
|
26 Sep 2003, 07:59 (Ref:730503) | #25 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,133
|
Fab how can you not like the Lancia? I thought it was the best looking Grp C car! (I liked the C100 as well! but agree on the Rondeau that horrible slopeing back creation was the not good).
|
||
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better. H S Thompson 1937 - 2005 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interesting Points from race | Rossi # 46 | Australasian Touring Cars. | 24 | 7 Mar 2005 11:08 |
DP's down below 1:46 at Daytona | gsmith2424 | North American Racing | 22 | 2 Feb 2004 07:07 |
DP's Fix | gttouring | Sportscar & GT Racing | 31 | 31 Mar 2003 13:52 |
Donno Interesting Points | Eddie_harasym | Touring Car Racing | 11 | 28 Sep 2002 21:58 |