|
| Site Partners: | SpotterGuides | Veloce Books |
| Related Sites: | Your Link Here |
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
8 Mar 2002, 01:05 (Ref:230504)
|
#1 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,946
 |
"Seagull Wingspan". So why is it so good??
The new Ferrari front wing is supposed to be revolutionary. I've seen the pics. And it is that. Quite simply, why so??
|
||
|
|
|
9 Mar 2002, 14:51 (Ref:231673)
|
#2 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 2,083
|
Revolutionary?I can't remember seeing much that hasn't been used by other teams.Can you be more specific?Have you got a picture?
|
||
|
|
|
|
10 Mar 2002, 08:22 (Ref:232072)
|
#3 | ||
|
Rookie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
Obviously, by now you'll notice most team have copied this aerodynamic solution that improves stability on high downforce circuits... |
||
|
|
|
|
10 Mar 2002, 12:34 (Ref:232158)
|
#4 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 1999
Posts: 2,946
|
No no no. They're still using the triple elephant. The seagul wingspan is the new F2002 front wing (NOT on the launch car, that was last years). Apparently it's revolutionary. I've seen pics and they're mad. I'll try to find one.
|
||
|
|
|
 |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| You've spotted it and thought "That's a good idea"! | b1ackcr0w | Marshals Forum | 18 | 8 Jul 2005 08:33 |
| Being a good development driver vs a good "racer"? | Mattracer | Formula One | 9 | 7 Jun 2004 11:07 |
| Derek Warwick - Grand Prix Driver and "bloody good bloke" | The Moon Monkey | Cool Sites | 16 | 6 Aug 2003 08:11 |
| Attention! Here is a good "pick'um" for this weekend's Darlington race | Joe Fan | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 10 | 18 Mar 2002 11:13 |
Linear Mode
