Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 2 Jul 2001, 12:21 (Ref:112068)   #1
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
QR Layout

Watched speedweek on FOX Sports this afternoon and noticed the trucks and NASCARS used a different layout than the Touring Cars. Hvae to say it looked like it would be a better track than the V8 track track, with the chicane making the lap a bit more interesting. Also,don't Tulloch and Crick's new trucks look great, i wonder if anyone will buy their old ones.
racer69 is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jul 2001, 00:20 (Ref:112331)   #2
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Racer, they use that short circuit (refered to as "B") for just about every state championship meeting out there. There are two other variations that they use- one that turns right just after turn 2, then left where the trucks went right, up the track in the wrong direction, then cut back over to turn 6 at the top of the track. That is short circuit "A", and then there is "C" which goes up the back straight then cuts over the top end of the track.

I personally like A, David ran on it the other weekend and he'd be able to give a better assessment of it. Most of the drivers apparently like B, and another good thing about it is that it keeps most of the action close to the main spectator area.

I think it was a super move to use circuit B instead of A this year, that was a great move
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jul 2001, 02:18 (Ref:112365)   #3
marcus
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
 
marcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Australia
Posts: 12,053
marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!marcus has a real shot at the podium!
Ive seen this short circuit on speedweek as well and I think it is pretty good..certainly more interesting than the totally boring layout they use for the v8's
but would the shortened circuit be a useable one for V8's ???

havent seen enough of it to say so but it would be interesting thats for sure.
marcus is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jul 2001, 08:51 (Ref:112425)   #4
DAVID PATERSON
Veteran
 
DAVID PATERSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Posts: 5,549
DAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The long circuit is dead boring and can be very hard on equipment, that is why it isn't popular for smaller meetings. It is however, the only layout that i believe is suitable for the V8s. In fact, it was specifically designed just to suit them.

Short circuit A, which I raced on a couple of weeks ago is also known as the Sprint circuit because it is the shortest at 1.89km. It is very challenging in parts and can produce exciting racing, but it's just plain unsuitable for large vehicles. The first crossover also has a very sharp crest which could do real damage to low slung cars.

Short cicuit B at 2.11km, is also known as the Clubman circuit and as Crash Test mentioned is used for most State championship meetings. I haven't raced on it for nearly 2 years, but it is still my favourite. It is certainly the easiest circuit on the equipment and the cars are directly in front of the spectator mound for about 80% of the lap.

Short circuit C has only been used once and i don't know anyone who likes it. It seems to combine the worst elements of the long circuit whilst also retaining the worst elememnts of the short circuits.
DAVID PATERSON is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jul 2001, 10:52 (Ref:112439)   #5
Ray Bell
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location:
Various parts of Australia
Posts: 2,221
Ray Bell should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I would have to agree with that latter assessment, though I have only seen the long circuit used.

Considering the clean sheet of paper they had (though restricted in available space) the circuit is atrocious. A flyover would have made for a much more interesting place.

The two better 'Club' variations are sometimes used in the one meeting, aren't they, David? They are more interesting, anyway, so much more variation...
Ray Bell is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Jul 2001, 11:43 (Ref:112462)   #6
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
In theory the track has everything going for it, and to be quite honest, I have seen some fantastic racing on all circuits. I think what it lacks is atmosphere. It's a mound with a piece of race track next to it. Rather uninspiring. To be honest, I don't mind the place, good facilities etc, but bad for photography.

The good thing about the sprint circuit in my opinion is that there is an extra overtaking spot. 4 real chances in under 2km is pretty good going.
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Jul 2001, 03:33 (Ref:115102)   #7
DAVID PATERSON
Veteran
 
DAVID PATERSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Posts: 5,549
DAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Hey Crash where's the fourth one?

1. Turn 1
2. the first crossover
3. the second crossover
4. ????????
DAVID PATERSON is offline  
Quote
Old 10 Jul 2001, 11:31 (Ref:115207)   #8
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Yeah, good question...umm, turn 2? on the power exiting t6? I'm not sure what I was thinking
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Jul 2001, 11:22 (Ref:115593)   #9
DAVID PATERSON
Veteran
 
DAVID PATERSON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Australia
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
Posts: 5,549
DAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDAVID PATERSON should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Turn 2 at QR is definitely not a passing point, I know I've tried and tried.
DAVID PATERSON is offline  
Quote
Old 11 Jul 2001, 11:36 (Ref:115599)   #10
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Well, I have seen many passes there, you can kind of get a cross over from turn 1, and I dont think I will ever forget Garth Tander passing a few cars there at the 99 Sprint Round.
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Anglesey Layout ss_collins Trackside 7 23 Feb 2004 22:27
track layout? jklein6419 Formula One 3 5 May 2003 06:30
New circuit layout on TV FG1 Sportscar & GT Racing 12 16 Apr 2002 21:22


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:03.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.