Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Australasian Touring Cars.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 16 Jul 2001, 04:56 (Ref:117549)   #1
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Calder Thoughts

What a Joke, Skaife is penalised for giving Johnson a little touch, while Larkham gets absolutly no penalty for spinning around Murphy at the same corner right behind them. Then in race 2 Morris, who is winning the race, is gettingflags saying he should move over, what a joke.
racer69 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jul 2001, 05:05 (Ref:117552)   #2
Champ69
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location:
ACT Australia
Posts: 663
Champ69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I agree. This years officials have done a terrible job so far. Remember Adelaide when Skaife was knocked of the track and (I forget the track) when HRT where deducted points for a team member doing donuts in a HRT (non race) car. I am not a HRT fan but they have been very disadvantaged due to official decisions.
Champ69 is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jul 2001, 06:38 (Ref:117580)   #3
Diabando
Veteran
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Australia
Victoria, Australia
Posts: 588
Diabando should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridDiabando should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Well, I had a lovely weekend! Aside from all the technicalities (I just cant be bothered), as a spectator, out to enjoy a day of V8 supercars, it was great Thankfully it didnt rain (Calder is SO cold and windy as it is, we didnt need rain to make it worse), and there was a huge crowd to support the teams. Complete access to the pits, and many autographs signed. A grand day

As far as Morris being shown "a flag to move over", this is incorrect. He was shown a bad sportsmanship flag. This means he can fight for his position as long as he wants (and NOT move over), but he has to be FAIR about it.

Skaife - well that was a BAD decision. From anyone there, or watching it on the TV, we can clearly see that he should not have been penalised. The stop-go rule must be reviewed, and SOON.
Diabando is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jul 2001, 07:21 (Ref:117601)   #4
Buckshot
Veteran
 
Buckshot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Australia
Cambridge Gardens, NSW, Australia
Posts: 1,632
Buckshot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridBuckshot should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Yeah the Skaife decision was just wrong. Radisich punted Skaife off at Adelaide and didn't get any sort of penalty when he should have been given a stop go.

Which brings me to the Bad Sportsman ship flag - get rid of this as well.

Morris can defend pretty good huh ? Guess he learnt a lot fending off Jim Richards in Super Tourers in 99 - couldn't ask for a better teacher than that !

Good on Paul for the round win. My opinion of him has gone up ten fold.
Buckshot is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jul 2001, 08:01 (Ref:117609)   #5
RALFANATOR
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location:
SYDNEY AUSTRALIA
Posts: 370
RALFANATOR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Calder Thoughts

Quote:
Originally posted by racer69
What a Joke, Skaife is penalised for giving Johnson a little touch, while Larkham gets absolutly no penalty for spinning around Murphy at the same corner right behind them. Then in race 2 Morris, who is winning the race, is gettingflags saying he should move over, what a joke.
well Skaife did push him off line so it was the right call (REMEMBER MARCOS & MURPHY AT THE CREEK )

well Larko should have gone to but was he pushed into Murpy?

Morris getting flagged while leading a race is the biggest joke I 've ever seen as leader he can take any line he likes just as Ingall was far off line which made it twice as worse

Pls some tell me why its better that officals allow defendind a position and the "later" stage of the race and while your there pls show me it in the rule book . By the on what number lap does the "later" stage rule kick in I've never heard of a more joke of a rule . If yuor in front its up to them to past as Murry Walker said "catching is one thing past is another "
RALFANATOR is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jul 2001, 10:20 (Ref:117650)   #6
mtpanorama
Veteran
 
mtpanorama's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Australia
Bathurst (best racetrack in the world)
Posts: 2,485
mtpanorama should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Re: Calder Thoughts

Quote:
Originally posted by RALFANATOR



well Larko should have gone to but was he pushed into Murpy?

I watched the tape a couple of times of the first corner and Ingall definately gave Larko a helping hand into the back of murphy. Ingall should have been given a stop/go for that one. He stuffed up 2 peoples day, plus a couple of others who were inocent victims.

With the Johnson/Skaife incident, with things like that cant the officials go down to HRT (or whoever they feel is in the wrong) and tell them to intruct their driver within say the next three laps that he must move over and give back the possition. Even though i hate Skaife and HRT that little nudge he gave Johnson didnt deserve the punishment of stuffing up his whole day. If he had turned Johnson around that would deserve a stop/go.

The punishment should fit the crime
mtpanorama is offline  
Quote
Old 16 Jul 2001, 11:30 (Ref:117684)   #7
RALFANATOR
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location:
SYDNEY AUSTRALIA
Posts: 370
RALFANATOR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Re: Re: Calder Thoughts

Quote:
Originally posted by mtpanorama



The punishment should fit the crime
I do agree with you but at the moment one rule fits all for once the offical's are being consitant they did it to MARCOS so buy all right Skaife got it to . Right call on the day
RALFANATOR is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jul 2001, 08:06 (Ref:118168)   #8
racer69
Veteran
 
racer69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Australia
Sydney, Australia
Posts: 10,040
racer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridracer69 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Whats next, penalties for looking like you might run into someone, or ones for pressuring a driver into a mistake.
racer69 is offline  
Quote
Old 17 Jul 2001, 11:46 (Ref:118257)   #9
Crash Test
Veteran
 
Crash Test's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Australia
Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 9,208
Crash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridCrash Test should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Firstly- when we say it's the ofifcials that are stuffing up, it's just the select few in race control calling the shots.

Also, remember when Skaife barked long and hard after Adelaide? Ok, so then they cracked down- yee haaa! The judge is doing their job!

Now when this effects you, of course you would have a rant about it....but sometimes it might be better if you kept your mouth closed in the first place...
Crash Test is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Calder this weekend cavvy Australasian Touring Cars. 86 22 Sep 2005 07:00
Calder Park Speedworx Australasian Touring Cars. 78 25 Apr 2002 06:06
AIR for sale? Calder next? RaceTime Australasian Touring Cars. 3 23 Oct 2001 12:59
Calder - V8 Supers Diabando Trackside 5 11 Jul 2001 11:02
Calder: Round 4 Vandas Trackside 7 25 Jun 2001 03:15


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:35.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.