|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
16 Aug 2001, 21:16 (Ref:131426) | #1 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,084
|
groupA / WRC??????
i'm not a huuge rally fan but i do watch it on the bbc when i can, and at the moment im wondering what the difference is between a group A car and a WRC as mitsubishi seem to have competed perfectly well with a group A car!
|
||
|
17 Aug 2001, 08:00 (Ref:131552) | #2 | ||
Racer
Join Date: May 2000
Posts: 114
|
Here's a brilliant site where you can find a concise explanation of various classes, present and past, in the WRC (way to go, Tryphon!)- http://www.rallycars.com/Cars/Cars_Background1.html.
Basically, the WRC class was introduced in a bid to lower the overall costs (since the number of cars required for homologation is 50), and attract more manufacturers, especially those who do not have a 2-litre-turbocharged-4WD cars in their line-ups. For that purpose (or because of that), a much wider spectre of modifications (as opposed to Group A, for innstance) was allowed. |
||
|
18 Aug 2001, 14:43 (Ref:132134) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,084
|
ah right
so is this why ford and peugeot entered with cars like the focus and 206? |
||
|
18 Aug 2001, 17:29 (Ref:132202) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 4,553
|
Basically a WRC car is easier to work with than a Group A car. More things can be done with a WRC car.
Mitsubishi have done every possible upgrade on the Group A Lancer to keep is at the top, but now is the time for a WRC car. Its like trying to win the F1 title with a 3 year old car, which has had every possible upgrade it can have. |
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
GroupC TO GroupA | moffman | Australasian Touring Cars. | 54 | 21 Jan 2003 11:19 |