|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
12 Mar 2004, 18:23 (Ref:903603) | #26 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
50 hp down, Kimis completed juist 52 laps at Australia before blowing up. Not good.
|
|
|
12 Mar 2004, 21:04 (Ref:903755) | #27 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 319
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
12 Mar 2004, 21:58 (Ref:903808) | #28 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,384
|
simple question why would a team sandbag during a race ?
|
||
|
13 Mar 2004, 11:17 (Ref:904259) | #29 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,114
|
Abosultely, McLaren was sandbagging. Undisputed.
|
||
__________________
Montoya, what just happened? |
13 Mar 2004, 12:49 (Ref:904353) | #30 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2000
Posts: 5,917
|
Testing..sandbagging perhaps..
But race?!! I think the car is capable of matching the Renault/Williams on pace, but the thing is that the car is struggling with reliability and hence they opted to run it in "safe mode", less power,less stressing the car etc... hence it made their car look slow too. But as the race showed..it didn't heelp Kimi |
||
__________________
Alonso: "McLaren and Williams are also great racing teams, but Ferrari is the biggest one that you can go to." |
13 Mar 2004, 15:15 (Ref:904440) | #31 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
I think the most concern is actually the handling of the car. Watching onboard at Oz it seemed to understeer on turn in and oversteer mid corner. Bloody horrible really......and it's very underpowered and very unreliable to boot. The tech team has got some serious work to do.
|
|
|
14 Mar 2004, 12:42 (Ref:905043) | #32 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,408
|
I am sorry to say this, because I have been a big McLaren fan in the past, but they are unlikely to win any World Championship in the near future. It's not the drivers (obviously), it's the car and the failure of the team to respond to problems that have been apparent since it was first tested. There is no GP at Valencia!
JPM must be kicking himself and DC may be thinking that a new team might not be such a bad thing after all. |
||
|
14 Mar 2004, 13:04 (Ref:905061) | #33 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,814
|
Well, I certainly think that they're in trouble this year. As Knowlesy has said, the handling appears to be a problem as well as the engine. In fact, didn't DC say that the car was lacking in engine power, mechanical grip, and aerodynamics? It rather begs the question as to what is good about the car!? However, I don't think JPM should be too depressed yet; McLaren will surely get better - they have strength in depth. And it's around about time for Newey to produce another masterpiece...
|
||
|
14 Mar 2004, 13:29 (Ref:905082) | #34 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 265
|
Sorry to disagree with the "sandbagging" concept. They are in it to win races, not hide their ability to do so. Another word beginning with 's' and ending with 'ing' comes to mind - STRUGGLING!
|
|
__________________
Life is not a spectator sport! |
14 Mar 2004, 18:49 (Ref:905183) | #35 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 184
|
i hate that, everytime i support something, they always do bad, so i m gonna support ferrari this season
|
||
|
14 Mar 2004, 19:47 (Ref:905217) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,760
|
I guess they were "sandbagging" insofar as they were playing it gentle with th engine, running hartdly any practice laps followed by lower reves that potentially so.
However, me thinks, that does not account for, as Ron would put it, Mclaren's "performance deficit". |
||
__________________
"The world is my country, and science is my religion." - Christian Huygens: 17th century Dutch astronomer. |
14 Mar 2004, 20:31 (Ref:905252) | #37 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
They were 1.8 seconds off in qualifying at Melbourne. Attribute a few tenths of that to Kimi's run being compromised by the dirty track from DC, and another few tenths from being fuelled for two-stops.
They are about 1 second a lap off the pace then - mostly caused by the under powered engine. The lack of power forced them to run less wing to compensate on the straights - which made the car worse in the corners. They'll get it sorted but it will take a while. |
|
|
14 Mar 2004, 22:17 (Ref:905349) | #38 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 319
|
Quote:
Last edited by hamsmith; 14 Mar 2004 at 22:18. |
|||
|
15 Mar 2004, 14:07 (Ref:905924) | #39 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,707
|
i think i hear them preparing the MP4-17 for Malysia!
|
||
__________________
"If there's anything more important than my ego around, I want it caught and shot now" Douglas Adams. 1952-2001 |
15 Mar 2004, 20:02 (Ref:906265) | #40 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,120
|
According to Autosport...Coulthard admits that his Merc engine was rev-limited. Therefore, McLaren was indeed sandbagging during the race (for reliablity).
|
||
|
15 Mar 2004, 20:07 (Ref:906272) | #41 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,476
|
In that context it isn't sandbagging. Every team's engine was 'rev-limited'. The level of the limit is set depending on the engine's reliability. All of them could up their limits, by 100s of rpm, but it wouldn't last!
Mercedes engine might have a lower limit than the rest, but this is because it's engine isn't as good. Anyway, funny thread title. Last edited by Adam43; 15 Mar 2004 at 20:08. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
15 Mar 2004, 21:24 (Ref:906354) | #42 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
I guess it just highlights the state mcLaren are in, that people think they forgot to get rid of the sandbags.
What would Ron make of this?!? |
|
|
15 Mar 2004, 23:16 (Ref:906482) | #43 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
Ron will be hurting more than anyone else about McLaren's problems.
But history shows he always leads the team back to success after a difficult spell. |
|
|
16 Mar 2004, 05:04 (Ref:906686) | #44 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,188
|
Sandbagging implies that they weren't going as fast as they could have. Given that a race is not just one lap, and the purpose of limiting the engines revs was to ensure it finished said race, I wouldn't call it sandbagging. After all I'm sure they were going as fast as they thought they could (while still ensuring they'd finish the race)...
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Empty Seats | josvandeperre | Formula One | 42 | 30 Jul 2004 14:30 |
empty seats | goody | Formula One | 8 | 20 Nov 2002 21:41 |
Empty seats at Nurburgring? | BBKing | Formula One | 25 | 24 Jun 2002 17:24 |
Empty Seats | Skid Jackson | NASCAR & Stock Car Racing | 2 | 13 Apr 2000 23:29 |