|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
11 Sep 2005, 14:15 (Ref:1404567) | #1 | |
20KPINAL
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 29,853
|
McLaren push on in longest 1-2 barren period record bid.
Will the grey and black boys ever get a 1-2?
Or will they continue this almost laughable routine of blown engines, reliability issues, the Montoya-backmarker-magnet scheme etc.... When will their next 1-2 arrive? Have to say, that one has me stumped. You have to laugh really! |
|
|
11 Sep 2005, 14:19 (Ref:1404573) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,006
|
Yeah, it's funny, I was talking to a friend of mine on the phone some 2-3 laps before the JPM incident, and he told me that we might actually get a 1-2 finally. I told him that that was impossible and honestly I was waiting to see what would happen. I don't know, if you asked 7-8 races ago I'd say that McLaren would definitely make it to at least 4 1-2s in this season. Then I thought that the engines were reliable too. Now it seems they'll never make it....
|
||
|
11 Sep 2005, 14:29 (Ref:1404590) | #3 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
By my reckoning they've had soemthing like 15 wins since their last 1-2, with is extraordinary. They've arguably had the 2 fastest cars at Belgium, Monza, Turkey, Silverstone and Canada this year, but they've all gone wrong in different ways.
|
||
|
11 Sep 2005, 16:42 (Ref:1404717) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,276
|
Ah, it'll someday come. Like the day with Ferraris being 2 s off the pace came...
|
||
__________________
"Many people depend on motor racing for their livelihood, to them it is a business. To me, it is a sport." -Jim Clark |
11 Sep 2005, 16:51 (Ref:1404721) | #5 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,004
|
The dejected looks of McLaren personnel on the pitwall despite Raikkonen winning said it all to me.
And perhaps the fact there was no-one from the team to collect the constructors trophy other than a bemused-looking Kimi. |
|
|
11 Sep 2005, 20:14 (Ref:1404940) | #6 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
11 Sep 2005, 21:40 (Ref:1405038) | #7 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,006
|
Imola too. Hockenheim... Nurburgring. And probably Indy, if Micheling had brought them tyres But not Canada, I think the Renaults were very very close, maybe marginally better there.
|
||
|
11 Sep 2005, 21:51 (Ref:1405056) | #8 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6,137
|
Quote:
At the moment Button threw himself in the wall, McLaren had a 1-2. |
|||
|
11 Sep 2005, 21:54 (Ref:1405060) | #9 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,006
|
yeah, but it was not exactly a "worthy" 1-2, Renaults were out, and Alonso's was not because his car had some problem. He just run into the wall. So I don't think McLaren were better than Renault there...
|
||
|
12 Sep 2005, 09:01 (Ref:1405388) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
Take yesterday for instance, had Kimi and Juan Pablo finished 1-2, it would have been worthy, but Juan Pablo was taken out, Fernando drove a calculated race and was there at the end, surely he was worthy of his 8 points, even though JPM would also been worthy of the 8 points (maybe 10 hd it not been for the switch?) edit - to quote Ron Dennis - to finish first, first you have to finish, same applies all the way down the grid - edit |
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
12 Sep 2005, 09:25 (Ref:1405412) | #11 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,006
|
Yes, that was not my point, let's not get into this again We were just talking about where McLaren were faster than Renault, and I said that I don't think they were genuinely faster in Canada, cause the Renaults were probably faster, as highlighted by the fact that Alonso was leading the race until he made a mistake. That's also why I used quotes for "worthy"
|
||
|
12 Sep 2005, 10:04 (Ref:1405447) | #12 | |
Registered User
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
|
But we don't know what the strategies were, Menelaos - the McLaren may have well been faster over the whole race distance.
|
|
|
12 Sep 2005, 10:41 (Ref:1405486) | #13 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 1,006
|
yes, that's true
|
||
|
12 Sep 2005, 18:10 (Ref:1405923) | #14 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,840
|
When was the last Renault 1-2? Williams? ....BAR? I think its a bizarre factoid.
|
|
|
12 Sep 2005, 18:13 (Ref:1405928) | #15 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,598
|
It is of relevance at the moment though as McLaren appear to have the fastest car and my a decent margin.
|
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
12 Sep 2005, 18:40 (Ref:1405965) | #16 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 3,840
|
Yeah but McLaren havent been in 1-2 potential situations every race since the last one, so the 'barren period' is half a season at most
|
|
|
12 Sep 2005, 20:19 (Ref:1406066) | #17 | ||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,598
|
Which is of course why all the uses in this thread (except one) are only really talking about this year.
On that aspect: I think McLaren will end this run before the end of the season. The car is getting better relatively not worse. However it will be interesting to see if Renault turn the wick up a little for race wins if they clinch the drivers title. Even though the constructors will still be up for grabs they really need a win (or at least split the McLarens) to spoil the McLaren charge as they are only six points ahead. |
||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bridgestone blame Safety Car period for tyre issue | Nicholosophy | Formula One | 29 | 20 May 2005 03:22 |
Can Coulthard beat Hakkinen's record of 8 full seasons with McLaren? | Yoong Montoya | Formula One | 11 | 17 Aug 2002 09:31 |
Longest name in F1?? | LucaBadoer | Formula One | 19 | 2 Jul 2001 13:30 |
Let's see McLaren or Ferrari go after the piston-engine wheel-driven record | Franklin | Racing Technology | 8 | 2 Jul 2000 02:43 |