|
| Site Partners: | SpotterGuides | Veloce Books |
| Related Sites: | Your Link Here |
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||
|
||||||||||
|
|
10 May 2002, 10:05 (Ref:281670)
|
#1 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,449
 |
Adelaide 500 - CAMS IOnvestigatory Findings
CONFEDERATION OF AUSTRALIAN MOTOR SPORT (CAMS)
PRESS RELEASE 10 May 2002 For Immediate Release 10 May 2002 CAMS STATEMENT 2002 V8 Supercar Championship Series - Clipsal 500 A CAMS Investigatory Tribunal has found that the extra lap awarded to car 34 for having been incorrectly held behind the safety car at this year's Clipsal 500 in Adelaide was, in all the circumstances, an over compensation. Delivering its findings last night, the Tribunal reduced the allowance to half a lap, amending the Race Results accordingly to show that car 34 finished in 6th position. Under the provisions of CAMS National Competition Rule 171, an inquiry was held on 15 April 2002 to investigate the Stewards determination made during Leg 1 of the 2002 Clipsal 500 to credit car 34 with a lap following the deployment of the safety car. The Tribunal's findings are subject to appeal. |
||
|
|
|
10 May 2002, 10:05 (Ref:281671)
|
#2 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,449
|
Now the question is - who officially takes the blame???
|
||
|
|
|
|
10 May 2002, 10:13 (Ref:281684)
|
#3 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,622
|
I don't think anyone will take the blame but I am sure it will be awarded in some sort of ceremony!
And the winner of the biggest cock up in the catagory of V8 Supercars is........... |
||
|
|
|
|
10 May 2002, 10:17 (Ref:281689)
|
#4 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,449
|
Comes back to the Race Director and the Stewards for this type of decision - RD for placing him in where he did and the Stewards for giving him an additional lap.
|
||
|
|
|
|
10 May 2002, 10:22 (Ref:281695)
|
#5 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,622
|
Who was the race director (and if it wasn't TS did he have TS leaning over his shoulder)
|
||
|
|
|
|
10 May 2002, 10:24 (Ref:281697)
|
#6 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 934
|
comes back to what an incompetant joke this series has become!!!!!!
|
||
|
|
|
|
10 May 2002, 10:37 (Ref:281709)
|
#7 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,449
|
Race Director for all V8 meetings is TS with Garth Wigston and Peter Wollerman as the two primary, permanent V8 Stewards.
|
||
|
|
|
|
10 May 2002, 10:41 (Ref:281719)
|
#8 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,622
|
I just discovered from my previous post that the auto censor dosen't pick up "cock" so now I can express my feelings for ........
|
||
|
|
|
|
10 May 2002, 10:45 (Ref:281726)
|
#9 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,449
|
LOL there are a few others as well - all of which can be used to describe current or past race control members
|
||
|
|
|
|
14 May 2002, 23:12 (Ref:286761)
|
#10 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,449
|
And now, Gary Rogers has issed a media release stating that unless AVESCO/TEGA basically 'ignore' the Investegatory Tribunals Result he (and therefore stick with the original one lap credit given to Tander) he will instigate legal proceedsing against AVESCO/TEGA.
Interesting in the release is this snippet: "I am completely at a loss to know why CAMS would do this other than to appease the Race Director Tim Schenken who had apparently been concerned that he had made a mistake in Adelaide," Rogers added. Full text here: http://www.racetime.com.au/?racenews=45830 |
||
|
|
|
|
15 May 2002, 00:19 (Ref:286794)
|
#11 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2000
Posts: 1,629
|
What a sticky situation this is...Garry Rodgers on one side of the arguement and from what I've seen Larry Perkins on the other - sometimes I think these are the only 2 guys that have read the rulle book the way they're always carrying on when rules are broken.
|
||
|
|
|
|
15 May 2002, 00:30 (Ref:286809)
|
#12 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,449
|
This will, actualy, be quite an interesting one as in effect Rogers is arguing that the AVESCO/TEGA rules can override the NCR's and FIA rules and regulations - and all along CAMS have stated that the pecking order is FIA, NCR's then series regs - the lower in the order a rule is, it can only add to or explain a higher up rule NOT change it.
If this succeeds, CAMS could be in a lot more trouble than appears on the surface. |
||
|
|
|
|
15 May 2002, 00:31 (Ref:286811)
|
#13 | ||
|
Veteran
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 5,449
|
And I thought I'd post this just to make my 1,000th post on Ten-Tenths...
|
||
|
|
|
|
15 May 2002, 02:18 (Ref:286876)
|
#14 | ||
|
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2001
Posts: 240
|
Congratulations Racetime!
It highlights the point that the order behind the Safety Car must be right before they pull it off the track. It is impossible to retrospectivley right any wrongs after the green flag is waved. |
||
|
|
|
|
15 May 2002, 02:29 (Ref:286882)
|
#15 | ||
|
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 222
|
Interesting point about the pecking order.
I'm not sure that the boys on Dandenong Road want anyone to challenge that right now.............. |
||
|
|
__________________
"If you have a ten dollar head, then wear a ten dollar helmet!" - Frank Matich
|
 |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Six Michelin Teams respond to findings - press release | mp356a | Formula One | 35 | 30 Jun 2005 18:52 |
| Mark Skaife - Court of Appeal Findings (spelling corrected due to operator error) | RaceTime | Australasian Touring Cars. | 9 | 5 Feb 2004 11:50 |
| Adelaide R1 - pretty boring - has Adelaide lost its magic?? | Michael H | Australasian Touring Cars. | 58 | 5 Apr 2002 23:47 |
| Adelaide 500 | Crash Test | Australasian Touring Cars. | 9 | 14 Mar 2002 06:39 |
| Off to Adelaide! | Crash Test | Australasian Touring Cars. | 15 | 7 Apr 2001 06:57 |
Linear Mode
