Home Mobile Forum News Cookbook FaceBook Us T-Shirts etc.: Europe/Worldwide. eBay Motorsport Links Advertising Live Chat  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Formula One


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 Dec 2005, 20:58 (Ref:1475129)   #1
wi11iamm
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
England
Worcester
Posts: 126
wi11iamm should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Toro Rosso Chassis

Sorry if this has already been covered...but what chassis will Toro Rosso be using next season?

I see they are using Red Bull chassis at the moment. Will that continue next season? Isnt there a issue with sharing components? As with Honda and S Aguri
wi11iamm is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Dec 2005, 21:02 (Ref:1475137)   #2
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
They'll get the Red Bull 2005 design, buy the intellectual property for 1, and build it themselves.

Fully legal.
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Dec 2005, 21:08 (Ref:1475142)   #3
wi11iamm
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
England
Worcester
Posts: 126
wi11iamm should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Why didnt Super Aguri do the same and purchase the rights to the 2005 BAR?
wi11iamm is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Dec 2005, 21:10 (Ref:1475146)   #4
Kicking-back
Registered User
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 16,661
Kicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridKicking-back should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Potentially not enough time to build it
Kicking-back is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Dec 2005, 21:19 (Ref:1475157)   #5
wi11iamm
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
England
Worcester
Posts: 126
wi11iamm should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Surely if that had been an option to them they would have been able to construct two cars by the start of the season.
wi11iamm is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Dec 2005, 21:25 (Ref:1475164)   #6
BootsOntheSide
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
England
Eastbourne, England
Posts: 13,000
BootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridBootsOntheSide should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Depends how many stuff they have and how impressive the facilties are.
BootsOntheSide is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Dec 2005, 21:30 (Ref:1475172)   #7
JohnMiller
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location:
Rutland
Posts: 3,056
JohnMiller should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJohnMiller should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It's because BAR want to carry over some componentry and they couldn't do that if they had sold the intellectual rights.

One team could have been sanctoned in that scenario and it would be BAR, who of course had their fuel tank debacle this year.
JohnMiller is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Dec 2005, 21:32 (Ref:1475177)   #8
wi11iamm
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
England
Worcester
Posts: 126
wi11iamm should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Ah ok.

So that means the RB2(?) wont have any parts carried over from the RB1.
wi11iamm is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Dec 2005, 23:21 (Ref:1475260)   #9
SpawnyWhippet
Veteran
 
SpawnyWhippet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Singapore
Posts: 730
SpawnyWhippet has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Surely they could get around that very easily by modifying minor details on the components, like moving the bodywork fasteners, different type of rod end on the wishbones etc?
SpawnyWhippet is offline  
__________________
"Centipede: An ant built to government specifications"
Quote
Old 2 Dec 2005, 01:31 (Ref:1475317)   #10
Marbot
Retired
20KPINAL
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
United Kingdom
Posts: 22,897
Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!Marbot is going for a new lap record!
Here's what they could do.
Marbot is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Dec 2005, 03:55 (Ref:1475344)   #11
avsfan733
Veteran
 
avsfan733's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location:
Rochester
Posts: 1,618
avsfan733 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
heres a situation where you go to the pros on this issue....toyota and sauber

in all reality i don't see the problem with it really? remember when teams used to farm out the actual monocoque construction? im sure several of them were to the same company...is that any different than rosso "paying" red bull to build the chassis of which they have intellectual property rights?
avsfan733 is offline  
__________________
I refuse to let fact get in the way of my opinion
Quote
Old 2 Dec 2005, 04:14 (Ref:1475349)   #12
SpawnyWhippet
Veteran
 
SpawnyWhippet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Singapore
Posts: 730
SpawnyWhippet has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
great avatar, AVSFan733!
SpawnyWhippet is offline  
__________________
"Centipede: An ant built to government specifications"
Quote
Old 2 Dec 2005, 04:39 (Ref:1475357)   #13
KE30MAN
Racer
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 492
KE30MAN should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
2002 Arrows!!!
KE30MAN is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Dec 2005, 05:35 (Ref:1475373)   #14
Skam85
Veteran
 
Skam85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Australia
Melbourne
Posts: 1,963
Skam85 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSkam85 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridSkam85 should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
2006 Super Aguri!!!
Skam85 is online now  
__________________
Part time wingman, full time spud.
Quote
Old 2 Dec 2005, 14:32 (Ref:1475764)   #15
Sztepen
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 13
Sztepen should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
from the article above:
"Concorde Agreement states that even if one owns the intellectual property rights of a chassis, it must not have been designed or manufactured by an existing operation"

So , back to topic , it seems that Toro Rosso WON'T be allowed to run the RB1 chassis in 2006 after all....? Am I right?
Sztepen is offline  
Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Toro Rosso DeoValente Formula One 21 14 May 2006 02:27
whats happened to squadro toro rosso? sihorton Formula One 10 7 Mar 2006 21:05
Ominous performance from Toro Rosso? arthurive Formula One 45 19 Feb 2006 17:22
Scuderia Toro Rosso OSTKURVE Formula One 2 25 Nov 2005 06:43
Squadra Toro Rosso renamed Scuderia Toro Rosso dazbaz_99 Formula One 21 24 Nov 2005 19:46


Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v3.2.3

All times are GMT. The time now is 16:17.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2018 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.