|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
7 Dec 2011, 20:48 (Ref:2996692) | #26 | ||
Race Official
20KPINAL
Join Date: Dec 1999
Posts: 21,606
|
The story has been told many times, I won't quote myself again about the whole thing.
|
||
__________________
Show me a man who won't give it to his woman An' I'll show you somebody who will |
7 Dec 2011, 22:00 (Ref:2996732) | #27 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,660
|
Two Benetton B194s ran in Euroboss there was a "facility" to run them with traction control and launch control........when one was put up for sale it even stated in the advert that it had traction control!
|
||
|
7 Dec 2011, 22:16 (Ref:2996740) | #28 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,734
|
Quote:
I think the simplest way to summarise why one car probably had it and the other probably didn't is that the team only had the resources to back one car and not 2. Although, there were several races when it seems that they both benefited from something (or perhaps neither did.) (although i am positive that my last post is also someway true no matter how some people may scoff!) |
|||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
7 Dec 2011, 22:19 (Ref:2996744) | #29 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,981
|
Maybe it is coincidence that Renault had the most effective launch control software from a very early stage and also:
"In high-performance racing vehicles, the driver has a very small threshold when it comes to acceleration. High power delivered by the engine to the gearbox and driven wheels cannot be easily managed even by the most experienced drivers. Faced with this issue, and with the growing development of electronics during the 1980s, it led to the introduction of this type of software [launch control]." "In 1985, Renault's RE60 F1 car stored information on a diskette which was later unloaded at the pits, giving the engineers detailed data about the cars' behaviour. Later on, telemetry allowed the data to be sent by a radio connection between the pits and the car. The increase of electronic-driven devices on the car allowed the engineers to modify the settings of certain parameters on the car while it was on the track, this being called bi-directional telemetry." By choice of the pit wall, this could be applied to neither car, one car, or both...... |
|
|
7 Dec 2011, 22:21 (Ref:2996748) | #30 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,734
|
|||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
7 Dec 2011, 22:38 (Ref:2996751) | #31 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,516
|
|||
__________________
my pen will not write on the screen |
7 Dec 2011, 22:51 (Ref:2996759) | #32 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
St. Flavio of Monte Carlo? Up to monkey business back in '94? Say it ain't so.
|
||
|
7 Dec 2011, 23:47 (Ref:2996791) | #33 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 8,088
|
Quote:
And Schumacher is still probably the fastest starting driver on the grid. Nothing beats a good conspiracy theory! |
||
|
8 Dec 2011, 03:11 (Ref:2996829) | #34 | ||
Ten-Tenths Hall of Fame
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,408
|
|||
|
8 Dec 2011, 06:22 (Ref:2996849) | #35 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 771
|
I won't take part in the dead horse beating on whether there truely were driving aids or not, but insinuating TGF was responsible for Senna's death because he allegedly cheated, as has been hinted at in this thread, is quite something. And not really something positive.
|
||
|
8 Dec 2011, 06:54 (Ref:2996855) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
Quote:
I completely believe Senna was going to go flat out no matter what, especially to show the new boy who was boss, driver aids or no driver aids. It's kind of like blaming Villeneuve's death on Pironi because Pironi made him mad. It's a shirt tail clinging by a thread argument to say the least. |
||
__________________
Wolverines! |
8 Dec 2011, 09:31 (Ref:2996903) | #37 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 611
|
Schumacher uses illegal TC during '94 shock horror!! lol
Talk about old news that we already know! |
|
|
8 Dec 2011, 09:44 (Ref:2996912) | #38 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 15,734
|
Quote:
Even DC was a often a better 'starter' than Schu when they were competing fiercly in the late 90's early noughties.. |
|||
__________________
"Double Kidney Guv'nah?" "No thanks George they're still wavin a white flag!" |
8 Dec 2011, 10:24 (Ref:2996925) | #39 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 393
|
Quote:
If (and its a pretty damn big if from what we know) Senna was driving outside of himself to beat a faster (even if illegally so) car then that is the choice any (most/all) racing driver makes. When you make the decision to be a competitor in a very dangerous sport you then make the choice of where your lines and limits where, and you make them for yourself. End of. As for lauding Schmacher as a cheat for taking advantage of a system they could keep secret enough for the FIA to not deem it illegal - show me any 1 driver or team who has ever resisted that temptation to push the rules in that way? That doesn't make it right to the fans, but to demonise one driver for it? Unfair. Do any of you think Senna or Prost or any of the greats wouldn't have done the exact same given half a chance? JV's comments certainly add weight to what we already believe about 1994, but its hardly a smoking gun now is it? |
|||
|
8 Dec 2011, 11:07 (Ref:2996947) | #40 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,192
|
Quote:
In fact, by 1994 it was not forbidden to have traction control software programmed on the on-board computer; only the usage of such software was prohibited. That year, Benetton fully admitted they still had traction control software programmed on their on-board computer, but denied they ever used it and stated they lacked the software required to enable the traction control. The FIA could not prove Benetton had broken the rules and the team was acquitted. |
|||
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari |
8 Dec 2011, 11:13 (Ref:2996950) | #41 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,192
|
Quote:
But Hakkinen is not German, is he? |
|||
__________________
'Aerodynamics are for people who can't build engines.' - Enzo Ferrari |
8 Dec 2011, 20:06 (Ref:2997203) | #42 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,211
|
Quote:
Michaels starts and progress have been immense whilst his qualifying has been awful |
|||
__________________
That's so frickin uncool man! |
9 Dec 2011, 22:34 (Ref:2997780) | #43 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,493
|
JV is just the latest of many to question the legality of the B194. Respect journalists, drivers and team owners have spoken out about the traction control, but it's never been wholly proved.
Schumacher was obviously a great driver, but that doesn't disprove the '94 allegations. |
|
|
9 Dec 2011, 22:56 (Ref:2997785) | #44 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
John |
|||
__________________
JOMO Eng |
9 Dec 2011, 23:02 (Ref:2997790) | #45 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 11,174
|
|||
|
9 Dec 2011, 23:05 (Ref:2997791) | #46 | ||
Weasel Wrangler
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,885
|
Briatore was a cheat, and the sport is better without him.
But to claim that whatever happened in 1994 somehow diminishes Schumacher's subsequent success is grasping at straws. As for any influence that may have had on Senna's tragic death, I agree with those who say it had none. And to those desperately trying to pin some blame on Schumacher and Briatore for their hero's death, maybe they should remember that Senna's on track morals were no different to Schumacher's. I also happen to think history may one day prove that while the obvious pantomime villain is Briatore, and so many non-tifosi F1 fans are convinced of Ferrari's cheating, McLaren under Dennis were up to at least as much skulduggery as anyone else. |
||
__________________
"Never pick a fight with an ugly person, they've got nothing to lose." |
9 Dec 2011, 23:22 (Ref:2997795) | #47 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,493
|
Quote:
|
||
|
9 Dec 2011, 23:40 (Ref:2997805) | #48 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
Quote:
even when he won a race "not bad for a #2 eh?" AussieGrit is fast and vettel may be getting preferential treatment, but you gotta go faster and get your starts better mark. as far as JV versus MS- well even when aids were gone- he was still winning, and when you disappeared well MS ended up winning 7 WDC's and be part of almost every record there is... |
|||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
10 Dec 2011, 00:03 (Ref:2997810) | #49 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
McLaren did have that system found in 1998 with a small brake pedal on the left that the driver could use to apply a bit of rear brake to moderate rear wheel spin. I think by 2000 it was legislated out, but maybe Mclaren found another way to do it that was not as obvious.
|
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
10 Dec 2011, 00:11 (Ref:2997813) | #50 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 4,320
|
Well, Verstappen seems to be throwing out circumstantial evidence and drivers intuition. Not good enough. If he had a witness or he himself witnessed named technicians put some funny bot into Schuie's Benetton then we might have something to add to the FIA body of evidence from '94. So I can only assume Jos is mischiefmaking/attention seeking and some mercenary journo is only too delighted to go along with that.
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Electronic driving aids? | Kirk | Formula One | 32 | 10 Nov 2004 21:11 |
Interview Michael Schumacher and Jos Verstappen. | steve nielsen | Formula One | 6 | 1 Sep 2002 17:35 |
Is Luca Badoer's driving style similar to Michael Schumacher's? | Yoong Montoya | Formula One | 1 | 10 Jun 2002 21:53 |
Verstappen enlists Schumacher's help | Gerard | Formula One | 4 | 23 Aug 2000 17:25 |