|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
10 Jul 2016, 18:27 (Ref:3658114) | #126 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
|||
|
10 Jul 2016, 18:34 (Ref:3658115) | #127 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 56
|
Quote:
|
||
|
10 Jul 2016, 18:38 (Ref:3658118) | #128 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
It also weighs a whole lot more.
|
||
|
10 Jul 2016, 18:59 (Ref:3658121) | #129 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,955
|
Quote:
R.L.L. BMW just can't seem to close the deal they always fade in that last stint. Porsche does not have the horsepower to compete plain and simple. Glad that Turner got it done though! |
||
|
10 Jul 2016, 19:02 (Ref:3658122) | #130 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,955
|
"Saloon"? You could say that about Bentley and Nissan too maybe. Its great that BMW is here. Awesome that Turner won today. Now R.L.L. needs to figure how to run a whole race.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2016, 19:13 (Ref:3658123) | #131 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Good race in gt, the rest was disappointing. Questionable driving standards by a few cars today. The #55 was robbed by an issue, again and the #70 Mazda was nowhere.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2016, 19:32 (Ref:3658128) | #132 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,665
|
|||
|
10 Jul 2016, 19:40 (Ref:3658130) | #133 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,934
|
The Bentley isn't a saloon. It's just a fat coupe.
|
|
|
10 Jul 2016, 19:48 (Ref:3658132) | #134 | |||
Racer
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 337
|
Quote:
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk |
|||
|
10 Jul 2016, 21:19 (Ref:3658166) | #135 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,143
|
Quote:
Both the bentley and bmw are over weight sedans/saloon/coupe what ever that don't belong and are not sports cars.at least the Nissan GT-R can compare to ferrari,corvette,audi,and porsche in production car form. It's great bmw is here and all but it's always been with an over weight sedan waiver mobile that needs bop help.be it an M3,M6,or the V8 Z4,a slap in the face to all the manufacture who build real legit sports cars. |
|||
__________________
RACE CAR: noun: an automobile built or modified for racing. |
10 Jul 2016, 22:09 (Ref:3658179) | #136 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 15,389
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Jul 2016, 01:14 (Ref:3658210) | #137 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Quote:
Y'all really put way too much thought into some of this stuff. |
|||
|
11 Jul 2016, 01:56 (Ref:3658214) | #138 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,665
|
Quote:
My point is claiming one car is unworthy in this formula makes no sense, since every car gets adjusted during some point of the season. |
|||
|
11 Jul 2016, 02:18 (Ref:3658216) | #139 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
Quote:
It's the dumbest argument made by the worst kind of fans, imo. You don't see those fans at the racetracks. They're not fun people to be around during a race. |
|||
|
11 Jul 2016, 02:35 (Ref:3658217) | #140 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,665
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
11 Jul 2016, 02:57 (Ref:3658220) | #141 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 7,175
|
I'm just extremely tired of people consistently complaining about stuff that really has no merit.
It's 2016. You can't just have one manufacture fly off into the distance and let everyone else languish behind and expect a series to grow. Manufactures don't have the money they had 25 years ago to be pumping into motorsport to "make a better car." They build what they want to see marketed, and hope it's quick out of the box. If not they know they'll get some help to remain competitive. I'd much rather see 5 manufactures competing for a win with some balancing help from the series than just one shooting off into the distance and running the other manufactures out because they cannot afford to keep pumping money into something they can't get a return on. |
||
|
11 Jul 2016, 04:16 (Ref:3658221) | #142 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 8,827
|
I for one feel that it's on the onus of the teams to try what they can to win on their own merit--you know, to be the best, you have to beat the best--before crying for BOP help from the sanctioning body.
But at the same time, why is the BMW M6 any different than the partial tube frame DeKon Chevy Monza IMSA GT cars that were built as a low cost way to compete with Porsche 911 turbos in IMSA GT in the late '70s and early '80s? It does IMO work both ways. |
||
|
11 Jul 2016, 05:08 (Ref:3658228) | #143 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 901
|
Quote:
|
||
|
11 Jul 2016, 08:11 (Ref:3658245) | #144 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 10,934
|
Quote:
McLaren MP4-12C - 1:16.2 Ferrari 458 - 1:19.1 Nissan GT-R - 1:19.7 Corvette ZR1 - 1.20.4 Audi R8 V10 - 1.21.6 Porsche GT3 RS - 1.22.3 Bentley Continental Supersports - 1:24.9 BMW Z4 M - 1:26.0 There's no M6 or modern Aston gone around it (DB9 was slower than all listed, apparently no Vantage has went round), and no modern Lambo lap either. Also no 488 or 650S. But it shows the Bentley is closer to the Audi R10 then the Audi R10 is to the McLaren and the Z4 is even further back. So really if we're using real worlds, then the case is that everything is miles off of each other (hence why we have the BoP), and the Bentley is a more appropriate car than the Z4 if we're to "compare" production car form speeds. |
||
|
11 Jul 2016, 12:24 (Ref:3658296) | #145 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,515
|
Wow, those corvettes sure did a lot of developing over the last week.......... Gtlm results feel artificial every week now. I have nonclue who the best car or team is, only who games the system the best or who got the breaks this week. Success ballast only please. At least then results would make sense and be clear.
Mazda is a complete joke. Ways they mismanaged yesterday: Not finding out about a problem that just so happened to crop up right before the race. Do they not check things beforehand? I get the feeling that rather than going over details with a fine tooth comb like well run teams, they just don't think about some things until they break. Bomarito is clearly not on the pace of Nunez. This was clear at Laguna secs and Watkins Glen that I remember and likely more. So why not take your best driver out after the minimum drive time and bring in your slower driver to close it out? If the race is six hours, it will break after 5. If it's 2 hours, it'll break after one. Just embarrassing. Haven't had a quality put stop when it mattered all year. Do they practice these things? On the bright side, they're at least sparing us John doonan's clown ass during the mid race report now. Instead we hear from Nunez who was inexplicably done for the day. I will say that prototype bop is just about perfect. It is extremely hard for p2s to pass, as it should be, since when they do, they can check out. Makes for some good racing and gives both p2s and dps a fair shot. P2 teams have only themselves to blame for the last two races. |
|
|
11 Jul 2016, 13:14 (Ref:3658303) | #146 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,955
|
[QUOTE=RWill2073;3658296]Wow, those corvettes sure did a lot of developing over the last week.......... Gtlm results feel artificial every week now. I have nonclue who the best car or team is, only who games the system the best or who got the breaks this week. Success ballast only please. At least then results would make sense and be clear.
[QUOTE] I disagree with this comment about GTLM for this round at CTMP. Ford won with good strategy and great driving from the best duo in the series Briscoe/Westbrook. Truly Porsche has problems with their speed right now. They got to work that one out themselves. Risi Ferrari missed the setup at CTMP and the #100 BMW is snake bitten for sure. I think we are going to see close racing in there for the rest of the year. GT was much better than prototype at CTMP. Lime Rock will be VERY interesting. Never have we seen GTLM/GTD/LMPC only. And a bull ring like LRP. Hold on folks that one will be very unpredictable. |
|
|
11 Jul 2016, 14:39 (Ref:3658313) | #147 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 4,434
|
RWill2073's point is that the BoP varies so much from race to race it is obvious the winners win by luck. Corvette was useless at the last race and nearly won this one---the only difference was the .2-mm restrictor increase. Not chassis development, not clever strategy, not time on the dyno or using CFD programs ... just BoP.
BoP might have been closer to correct this week--Porsche might disagree. But the question is, what will it be next week? "May the best car and team win" means nothing, because the fact is, "The best BoP will win." IO still enjoy the racing, but I do not try to fool myself about what I am watching. |
|
|
12 Jul 2016, 02:26 (Ref:3658450) | #148 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 15,665
|
Check out this interview with Ron Fellows at Mosport. John almost lost the car and Ron looked uncomfortable as a passenger!
http://www.dailysportscar.com/2016/0...ound-ctmp.html |
||
|
12 Jul 2016, 03:11 (Ref:3658452) | #149 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 2,143
|
Watching the broadcast on YouTube at 39 minutes during the 55 mazda joke of a pit stop.the car was dropped while the right rear was going on even the pit reporter points it out.looks like the failure might have been damage from that embarrassingly joke of a pit stop.
|
||
__________________
RACE CAR: noun: an automobile built or modified for racing. |
12 Jul 2016, 15:46 (Ref:3658545) | #150 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,955
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
FRC 2016 - IMSA Round 7: Mosport | joeb | Predictions Competitions | 7 | 12 Jul 2016 01:46 |
Going to CASCAR at Mosport this weekend? | Liz | Trackside | 7 | 30 Aug 2000 01:59 |
Mosport @ The CNE in Toronto | Lil'Jen | Cool Sites | 2 | 11 Aug 2000 13:52 |
Mosport ALMS race! | Heeltoe6 | North American Racing | 8 | 10 Aug 2000 12:17 |