Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Single Seater Racing > Club Level Single Seaters

View Poll Results: Should steel crankshafts be used.
Steel crankshafts...yes 117 75.48%
Steel crankshafts...no 9 5.81%
Leave it the way its always been 29 18.71%
Voters: 155. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 22 Aug 2004, 19:45 (Ref:1074588)   #26
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
A Zetec engine is cheap but its **** to drive you can not beat a Kent for serious fun,A good Zetec can do the same times as a good Kent round Anglesey but to me the Kent is more rewarding to drive he says with rose tinted glasses.

Last edited by Ian Sowman; 22 Aug 2004 at 21:48.
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Aug 2004, 21:43 (Ref:1074659)   #27
JohnMiller
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location:
Rutland
Posts: 3,069
JohnMiller should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridJohnMiller should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by jadlamracing
What about zetec engines,ABC10,alloy wheels & calipers ?
1993?
JohnMiller is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 12:25 (Ref:1075079)   #28
Barny
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 146
Barny should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
mattray's suggestion of F1600 is I believe the route to take. Ford as I understand it have passed the manufacturing writes of all Kent parts to Sky Ford a dealer in Hemel Hempstead, we are at there mercy as far as cost, quality and supply is concerned.
We need to have the support of all FF1600 competitors and engine builders and change the technical regs to alow the use of alternative components, which we could control i.e camshafts and cranks. Not only could our engines last longer but we could control the price, as I am sure we could get a deal on large quantites.

Over to Club 1600 I think...........
Barny is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 13:26 (Ref:1075134)   #29
Triple J Motorsport
Veteran
 
Triple J Motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
England
Burgess Hill W Sussex
Posts: 1,920
Triple J Motorsport should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Barny
mattray's suggestion of F1600 is I believe the route to take. Ford as I understand it have passed the manufacturing writes of all Kent parts to Sky Ford a dealer in Hemel Hempstead, we are at there mercy as far as cost, quality and supply is concerned.
We need to have the support of all FF1600 competitors and engine builders and change the technical regs to alow the use of alternative components, which we could control i.e camshafts and cranks. Not only could our engines last longer but we could control the price, as I am sure we could get a deal on large quantites.

Over to Club 1600 I think...........
It is not just FF1600 but FF1800 too

Bigger FF1800 club grids in 2005 then!
Triple J Motorsport is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 13:32 (Ref:1075142)   #30
Triple J Motorsport
Veteran
 
Triple J Motorsport's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
England
Burgess Hill W Sussex
Posts: 1,920
Triple J Motorsport should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid

Quote:
Originally posted by ZetecNo9
It is not just FF1600 but FF1800 too

Bigger FF1800 club grids in 2005 then!
2005 - FF dies as a step on the ladder to F1? Very sad
Triple J Motorsport is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 13:44 (Ref:1075160)   #31
diz
Veteran
 
diz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
England
Cheshire
Posts: 3,843
diz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Still all isn't lost John.
FF1800 can still be a step on the ladder to FF1600
diz is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 22:24 (Ref:1075633)   #32
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Is there nothing in between Diz?
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 23:14 (Ref:1075665)   #33
diz
Veteran
 
diz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
England
Cheshire
Posts: 3,843
diz should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by blue nose
Is there nothing in between Diz?
Obviously not FBMW Pikey. Seems you and I have rattled a few cages there me old mucker
diz is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 23:26 (Ref:1075673)   #34
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Well they do need to get out a bit more!!!!
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Old 23 Aug 2004, 23:53 (Ref:1075685)   #35
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
So how do we change over to a steel cranckshaft then and when can we get on with it.
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Aug 2004, 09:39 (Ref:1075959)   #36
RMR
Veteran
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
England
Surrey
Posts: 661
RMR should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
mattray
Quote:
if the rules cant be changed why dont we create Formula1600
I'm dissapointed I havent had a flyer or email about Formula1600Tech yet?
RMR is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Aug 2004, 10:43 (Ref:1076005)   #37
jadlamracing
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location:
somerset
Posts: 99
jadlamracing should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
How much are these steel cranks? I can supply brand new boxed ford crankshafts £300 .Why don't you all but a spare one? jadlam.racing@btinternet.com
jadlamracing is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Aug 2004, 10:56 (Ref:1076013)   #38
Ian Sowman
Veteran
 
Ian Sowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Birmingham
Posts: 5,968
Ian Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridIan Sowman should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
As it's relevant I will let that most shameless of ads go!
Ian Sowman is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Aug 2004, 11:29 (Ref:1076038)   #39
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Are they the standard ones.
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Aug 2004, 11:34 (Ref:1076041)   #40
JimW
Veteran
 
JimW's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
United Kingdom
Worcestershire, UK
Posts: 3,362
JimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridJimW should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
All right, I'm going to let my ignorance show (not for the first time cries a voice from the back )

If your current cranks are not made from "steel", what are they made from?

Regards

Jim
JimW is offline  
__________________
Life is not safe, just choose where you want to take the risks.
Quote
Old 24 Aug 2004, 11:40 (Ref:1076046)   #41
mattray
Veteran
 
mattray's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location:
Dorking
Posts: 680
mattray has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
Iron
mattray is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Aug 2004, 18:44 (Ref:1076404)   #42
Séamas M.
Racer
 
Join Date: May 2003
Northern Ireland
Lurgan,County Armagh
Posts: 116
Séamas M. should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It's been a long time since I looked closely at a FF1600 engine, but if the major source of breakage is bottoming the flywheel how about changing to a smaller diameter flywheel?? (OK and ring gear, relocate starter, maybe smaller clutch.... I'll get me coat )
Séamas M. is offline  
Quote
Old 24 Aug 2004, 19:13 (Ref:1076422)   #43
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
It will not break if its a steel item.
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Aug 2004, 00:27 (Ref:1076647)   #44
GolddustMini
Veteran
 
GolddustMini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Just South Of Nowhere...
Posts: 1,254
GolddustMini should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by blue nose
It will not break if its a steel item.
seems like a completely blanket statement to me, want a bet?

Last edited by GolddustMini; 25 Aug 2004 at 00:29.
GolddustMini is offline  
__________________
never eat belly button fluff
Quote
Old 25 Aug 2004, 00:30 (Ref:1076651)   #45
GolddustMini
Veteran
 
GolddustMini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Just South Of Nowhere...
Posts: 1,254
GolddustMini should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally posted by Séamas M.
It's been a long time since I looked closely at a FF1600 engine, but if the major source of breakage is bottoming the flywheel how about changing to a smaller diameter flywheel?? (OK and ring gear, relocate starter, maybe smaller clutch.... I'll get me coat )
you have to use a ford flywheel of a given part number as far as im aware
GolddustMini is offline  
__________________
never eat belly button fluff
Quote
Old 25 Aug 2004, 19:11 (Ref:1077306)   #46
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I use a nice anodised one that I borrowed of Jason and it works fine.
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Old 25 Aug 2004, 19:30 (Ref:1077322)   #47
GolddustMini
Veteran
 
GolddustMini's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location:
Just South Of Nowhere...
Posts: 1,254
GolddustMini should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
did u get the underbody neons to complement it?
GolddustMini is offline  
__________________
never eat belly button fluff
Quote
Old 27 Aug 2004, 05:25 (Ref:1078802)   #48
kartingdad
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,229
kartingdad has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
It's not just the cost of the crank, but when the crank lets go, it usually takes out the block, some rods, pistons, cam, sump pan etc. If your lucky, the head will be ok though!
kartingdad is offline  
Quote
Old 27 Aug 2004, 05:54 (Ref:1078806)   #49
jadlamracing
Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location:
somerset
Posts: 99
jadlamracing should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
How many of you change the crank at every rebuild ? or at least get it checked.
Do you have that many let go Oulton?
Is this a recent problem?
Are there many kerbs?
jadlamracing is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Aug 2004, 18:34 (Ref:1080794)   #50
blue nose
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,818
blue nose should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
When I have had rebuilds the crank has always been scraped.
blue nose is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Cranks with Flywheels Walshy Club Level Single Seaters 19 9 Feb 2009 12:57
FF1600 in the UK jimbomit Club Level Single Seaters 4 8 Nov 2005 15:19
Which FF1600 Midgebradley Club Level Single Seaters 33 29 Jun 2005 17:11
Which came first - the FF1600 or the Vee! :) Triple J Motorsport Club Level Single Seaters 75 21 Mar 2005 15:37


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:44.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.