|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
12 Jan 2007, 22:58 (Ref:1813705) | #1 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 33
|
'Control Bodywork'?
With all of these efforts to slow down teams and reduce costs, and the advent of a 'control tyre', it occured to me that maybe a similar idea could possibly be applied to the bodywork of an F1 car.
A lot of the problems in modern F1 can be attributed to aero. If all of the removeable body parts (nosecone, rear shell etc) were standardised and provided to teams from one supplier, to be attached to a team-developed monocoque, it could both reduce development costs and make the racing more competitive. I don't know if it could work or not, especially since the FIA's last attempt at rear wing design, but it would certainly give more scope for reducing the 'dirty air' effect. Perhaps teams would have 2 choices for each body part, a high downforce version and a high straightline speed version? Each team could pay a yearly contribution to aero development, giving the supplier possibly a bigger aero development budget than any of the teams on the grid at the moment, while reducing that cost for all teams. This would give smaller teams a chance to make their way up the grid. It might be a bit too near to a one-make series though. What do others think? |
||
|
12 Jan 2007, 23:27 (Ref:1813722) | #2 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 813
|
Bodywork should be free, within certain limits.
Maybe there is slightly too much downforce at the moment, but all these aero-mods help make the cars look distinctive from one another. Too much is made of the so-called problem of "dirty air" as relating to overtaking IMO. I think the proposed energy storing devices will do more to help overtaking than any aero redesign. It'll be like years ago when drivers still had Turbo's they could turn-up in order to get past somebody. |
||
|
13 Jan 2007, 11:48 (Ref:1813968) | #3 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
We already have control tyres (about which there has been much debate),lets leave it at that shall we.
|
|
|
13 Jan 2007, 12:31 (Ref:1813982) | #4 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,964
|
I don't think there should be a "control bodywork" as such, but, there should be rules on winglets, and number of things that redirect airflow to the rear wing.
Hopefully that should tidy up the car, and the air behind it. |
||
__________________
Hah! |
13 Jan 2007, 13:16 (Ref:1814197) | #5 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 199
|
No way, that's not what F1 is about.
|
||
|
13 Jan 2007, 15:08 (Ref:1814296) | #6 | |
Racer
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 378
|
Formula One should also not be about control tires, control rotors, control calipers, control engine, contro electronics, control gearboxes, control materials, control replacements....but it is, and it's not Formula One anymore. Shoud be renamed Formula Spec Car
|
|
|
13 Jan 2007, 15:50 (Ref:1814329) | #7 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 2,714
|
Why do people constantly think that there is something wrong with F1 that needs to be fixed?
They also attribute these 'problems' to aerodynamics even though that is nothing more than heresay and they never have any data to prove the allegation! |
|
|
13 Jan 2007, 17:59 (Ref:1814408) | #8 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
Bad idea and not for me..
|
||
|
13 Jan 2007, 18:03 (Ref:1814411) | #9 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 9,746
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
13 Jan 2007, 18:06 (Ref:1814418) | #10 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,192
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
13 Jan 2007, 18:26 (Ref:1814425) | #11 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
|
||
|
13 Jan 2007, 18:58 (Ref:1814438) | #12 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
13 Jan 2007, 19:10 (Ref:1814442) | #13 | |
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Wouldn't it be interesting however,if say a sparkplug company developed a sparkplug that increased horsepower by 25%,and then decided to let Spyker have sole use of them.What a team! What a car! And what great drivers!
Last edited by Marbot; 13 Jan 2007 at 19:13. |
|
|
13 Jan 2007, 19:32 (Ref:1814449) | #14 | |||
14th
1% Club
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 42,600
|
Quote:
Oh and bodywork and tyres have more relative importance on car performance, your 25% thought notwithstanding. |
|||
__________________
Seriously not taking motorsport too seriously. |
13 Jan 2007, 20:09 (Ref:1814467) | #15 | |||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
Quote:
25% was just off the top of my head.It could be 100%,but then it would be banned wouldn't it. I can understand why a tyre technician would now no longer bother to watch F1. Last edited by Marbot; 13 Jan 2007 at 20:12. |
|||
|
13 Jan 2007, 20:18 (Ref:1814473) | #16 | ||
Llama Assassin and Sheep Botherer
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,212
|
F1 cars should be going faster not slower.
Control is for Formula Fords. |
||
|
13 Jan 2007, 20:31 (Ref:1814481) | #17 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
There has to be control somewhere! Last edited by Marbot; 13 Jan 2007 at 20:34. |
||
|
13 Jan 2007, 20:41 (Ref:1814488) | #18 | |||
Llama Assassin and Sheep Botherer
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,212
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
13 Jan 2007, 20:42 (Ref:1814489) | #19 | ||
Retired
20KPINAL
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 22,897
|
Quote:
You're not likely to hear an F1 car designer say "We can't make it any faster,we're losing too many drivers!" Last edited by Marbot; 13 Jan 2007 at 20:46. |
||
|
13 Jan 2007, 20:52 (Ref:1814497) | #20 | ||
Llama Assassin and Sheep Botherer
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,212
|
Time for F1 to go like A1 then and have total control.If F1 isn't going to be free for all then you may as well have total control cars and sell them all off as a franchise.
|
||
|
13 Jan 2007, 21:21 (Ref:1814513) | #21 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
It is not the speed of the cars that is the problem is it?
|
||
|
13 Jan 2007, 22:14 (Ref:1814555) | #22 | |||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 5,705
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
13 Jan 2007, 22:27 (Ref:1814564) | #23 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2000
Posts: 11,402
|
Quote:
I could not agree more with you more...How they the "experts" achieve this, well that is for them to know and implement for heavens sake... |
|||
|
14 Jan 2007, 00:33 (Ref:1814616) | #24 | |||
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 33
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
14 Jan 2007, 08:04 (Ref:1814687) | #25 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,534
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Mos Eisley spaceport, A more wretched hive of scum and villiany you will not find anywhere in the galaxy, we must be careful. |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Bodywork for a PRS | Alan Raine | Club Level Single Seaters | 5 | 22 Jan 2006 20:16 |
New style bodywork | speedy king | Kart Racing | 7 | 12 Jun 2004 20:25 |
Swift Bodywork | JohnMiller | Club Level Single Seaters | 4 | 9 Jun 2004 19:46 |
Bodywork | Walshy | National & International Single Seaters | 4 | 16 Jan 2004 00:19 |
Rs200 Bodywork | Robin Plummer | Rallying & Rallycross | 10 | 27 Mar 2003 13:38 |