Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Racing Talk > Racing Technology

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 Nov 2006, 10:28 (Ref:1755135)   #1
Speedy5
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 23
Speedy5 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Aluminium or Stainless Steel for floor?

I have a spaceframe chassis on which I am replacing the floor. It is currently covered in a combination of .7mm aluminium and .5mm stainless steel. I would prefer to replace it with 1 complete piece. I know stainless steel is heavier but gives better protection against something coming up from underneath.
However, if I want to use stainless steel, how thin can I go? Will .3 or.4mm stainless give as much protection as .7mm ali ?
What do people generally use?
Speedy5 is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Nov 2006, 10:51 (Ref:1755150)   #2
Notso Swift
Veteran
 
Notso Swift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
United Nations
37deg 46'52.36" S 144deg 59' 01.83"E
Posts: 1,910
Notso Swift should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
The protection of 0.7mm Aluminium is, well, about none...

Seriously Ali will be better against larger blunter objects whail steel will resist piercing better
Notso Swift is offline  
__________________
Contrary to popular opinion, I do have mechanical sympathy, I always feel sorry for the cars I drive.
Quote
Old 1 Nov 2006, 13:30 (Ref:1755289)   #3
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
For the same thickness of material the steel is about 2.78 x the weight of the ally and, if the ally is in T6 condition, 2.5 x the strength. The steel will be about 3 x the stiffness of the alloy too.

Out of interest, what is the area of the floor? We can then see just what the weight saving will be. 0.3 mm steel will be 17.6% heavier than 22 gauge alloy. For 1 square metre the weight difference between 22 gauge alloy and 0.3 mm stainless steel would be .35 Kg - 12.3 oz.

For this slight weight penalty, 0.3mm steel would 6% stronger and 23% stiffer than the existing 0.7 mm alloy. It would also have greater resistance to penetration and tearing.
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Nov 2006, 14:23 (Ref:1755331)   #4
Speedy5
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 23
Speedy5 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Thanks for that info Phoenix. The floor area is 91cm x 230cm, i.e. about 2 sq metres. Hence .7kg heavier. I think that's worth it, don't you?

Last edited by Speedy5; 1 Nov 2006 at 14:33.
Speedy5 is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Nov 2006, 14:47 (Ref:1755342)   #5
Speedy5
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 23
Speedy5 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Further question about replacing floors:
I will, of course, drill out all the old rivets leaving holes in the chassis, which I will want to use for the new floor.
What's the trick to getting the holes drilled in the new floor to match the existing holes in the chassis?
Speedy5 is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Nov 2006, 15:06 (Ref:1755351)   #6
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy5
Thanks for that info Phoenix. The floor area is 91cm x 230cm, i.e. about 2 sq metres. Hence .7kg heavier. I think that's worth it, don't you?
I would think so. And it's in the right place - as low as you can get it in the car.
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Nov 2006, 15:12 (Ref:1755359)   #7
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by Speedy5
Further question about replacing floors:
I will, of course, drill out all the old rivets leaving holes in the chassis, which I will want to use for the new floor.
What's the trick to getting the holes drilled in the new floor to match the existing holes in the chassis?
First warning: Drilling the old rivets out is likely to leave you with over-size holes so you may need to go up a rivet size.

The only way I can think of to line the holes up is to lay the old floor on the new floor and use it as a pattern for drilling. But I don't think it will work too well, to be honest.

IMHO, a better idea would be to use the old floor as a pattern to make new holes in the new floor and in the chassis between the old holes - if the spacing of the old rivet holes will allow this. Then you will have all news hole in both - and some of the 0.7 kg of the new floor will be offset by the extra holes in the chassis!
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Nov 2006, 17:28 (Ref:1755467)   #8
terence
Veteran
 
terence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Germany
Nordschleife
Posts: 12,853
terence should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridterence should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix
First warning: Drilling the old rivets out is likely to leave you with over-size holes so you may need to go up a rivet size.

The only way I can think of to line the holes up is to lay the old floor on the new floor and use it as a pattern for drilling. But I don't think it will work too well, to be honest.

IMHO, a better idea would be to use the old floor as a pattern to make new holes in the new floor and in the chassis between the old holes - if the spacing of the old rivet holes will allow this. Then you will have all news hole in both - and some of the 0.7 kg of the new floor will be offset by the extra holes in the chassis!
And dont forget to de-burr all holes, this will stop the rivets from coming loose at a later date.
terence is offline  
__________________
Living the dream,Chief instruktor and racing on the worlds best circuits-The Nordschleife and Spa.Getting to drive the worlds best cars-someone has to do it, so glad its me.
Quote
Old 2 Nov 2006, 20:51 (Ref:1756527)   #9
ger80
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Germany
Birmingham
Posts: 1,710
ger80 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by phoenix
For the same thickness of material the steel is about 2.78 x the weight of the ally and, if the ally is in T6 condition, 2.5 x the strength. The steel will be about 3 x the stiffness of the alloy too.
T6 isnt very good in corrosion, isnt it?
Think I would use 2024T351 clad
ger80 is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Nov 2006, 08:31 (Ref:1756889)   #10
greenamex2
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Hertfordshire
Posts: 1,686
greenamex2 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Fibreglass sheet?

My kit car uses it and I've not have a problem in 28,000 miles.
greenamex2 is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Nov 2006, 11:15 (Ref:1757069)   #11
Speedy5
Rookie
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 23
Speedy5 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Fibreglass sheet? Not considered that. What thickness do you use, and how heavy is it compared to Steel and Ali?
Speedy5 is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Nov 2006, 11:23 (Ref:1757075)   #12
greenamex2
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
England
Hertfordshire
Posts: 1,686
greenamex2 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
A couple of mm.

Not sure how the weight would compare or whether it would contravene any MSA regulation.
greenamex2 is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Nov 2006, 11:32 (Ref:1757081)   #13
rcarr
Veteran
 
rcarr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Germany
Back to the homeland of Scotland!
Posts: 952
rcarr has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
I am building my Special Saloon Sunbeam Californian, personally I wouldn't touch steel for the floor! Aluminium or Glassfibre only.

The steel would be such a weight penalty, I am trying to remove as much weight as possible, if lyposuction was free I would use that! Anything to make my car faster up the straight.
rcarr is offline  
__________________
These comments are my personal opinion, they do not reflect the views of others at Carr Racing. Born into racing! Will never leave racing, ever! Its in my blood!
Quote
Old 3 Nov 2006, 16:53 (Ref:1757238)   #14
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Nothing wrong with fibreglass as a floor, as long as it doesn't compromise the original design.

Panels, including floors, on space frame cars are often designed to carry part of the chassis loads, as they can increase the stiffness of the chassis considerably and so lighter (smaller diameter and/or gauge) tubes can be used. If replacing an alloy floor with any other material this should be considered. I had a Davrian with a fibreglass floor - but from memory it must have been 8mm thick.

Fibreglass has a Youngs modulus about 30% that of steel (I am using steel as a reference point only - I am not suggesting its use above any other material)

Therefore, to have a flat panel as stiff as steel made from fibreglass it would need to be 3.2 x as thick. And that is a minimum, as the layup glass fibre can be inconsistent so a tolerance thickness is normally added. Steel is only 3.12 x the density of GRP - so to get the same rigidity from fibreglass as steel you actually need a HEAVIER panel.

An 18 gauge steel floor in a saloon car, for example, would therefore need to be replaced with at least 5mm of fibreglass - if it was to offer the same rigidity as the steel. If the 18 gauge steel floor had pressings in it - which most if not all do - then it would be much stiffer - possibly 5-10 times as stiff. Ribs could be added to a fibreglass floor - but if they were not a flat fibre glass floor might need to be 25 mm+ thick. Glass fibres have incredible tensile strength - nearly 6 times that of steel - but once the glass is laminated with resin this falls to 1/3rd or less than the tensile stength of steel - even using the best ester resins.

Most designers who want to use composite floors would use a honey comb cored, twin skinned panel. This design gives the strength of a much thicker floor but without the weight penalty. This is how the earliest composite cars were built and how (civil) aircraft floors are made.

Going back to the Davrian, it had a contoured floor with some deep, box like structures designed into it. Curves and boxes add considerable strength to all materials, and composites are no exception. Another thing to avoid if using a GRP floor is heat. At 50 degrees C GRP has only 80% of the strength of GRP at 20 degrees. at 80 degrees it only hass 55% of the strength it has at 20 degrees. So running an exhaust under a fibreglass floor is not to be recommended!
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Nov 2006, 20:03 (Ref:1757336)   #15
ger80
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Germany
Birmingham
Posts: 1,710
ger80 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
GRP has a temperature problem, CFRP have a impact problem, steel in the needed thickness will be buckling if you are using a sheet only.
Sandwich plate sounds ok, but you have to take care than no water gets into it. Thats increasing the weight over the time.
Use Al, thats always ok. Maybe Al Li (AA2090), saves a few percent weight and gives a little higher stiffness, but of course more expensive
I wouls use 20mm Al (Li) plate and mill a sheet with rips on it out of that plate, but I think nobody else would use that solution here ...

Last edited by ger80; 3 Nov 2006 at 20:05.
ger80 is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Nov 2006, 11:31 (Ref:1757687)   #16
JohnD
Veteran
 
JohnD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
North West UK
Posts: 1,074
JohnD should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJohnD should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Having followed this thread with interest, learning all the time, I'm stumped by your post, Ger! "use 20mm Al (Li) plate and mill a sheet with rips on it out of that plate"? 20mm - that's nearly an inch thick! Are you building a tank?
Please explain!

I'm also interested in the composite question, Phoenix, having made non-loadbearing panels from composite GRP and paper honeycomb. Those achieved enormous weight loss and increase in stiffness (3 times lighter and ??100 times stiffer), but that I would not trust for a floor against penetration. Were you referring to alloy skins AND honeycomb?

John
JohnD is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Nov 2006, 21:28 (Ref:1757919)   #17
ger80
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Germany
Birmingham
Posts: 1,710
ger80 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Build a tank? No, I would use a 20mm plate and mill a sheet with integrated rips (for more stiffness) out of that plate. Well, I am working in aircraft industrie . 95% of the delivered material goes back as chips
ger80 is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Nov 2006, 21:40 (Ref:1757924)   #18
ger80
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Germany
Birmingham
Posts: 1,710
ger80 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
For sandwich/honeycomb visit hexcel website.
There a some very interesting pdf files, for example one special guide for motorsports http://www.hexcel.com/NR/rdonlyres/C...ctorGuides.pdf

Honeycomb energy absorbing: http://www.hexcel.com/NR/rdonlyres/9...onBrochure.pdf

Design tips:
http://www.hexcel.com/NR/rdonlyres/8...and_Design.pdf

View all:
http://www.hexcel.com/Products/Downloads/Brochures/

Last edited by ger80; 4 Nov 2006 at 21:42.
ger80 is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Nov 2006, 00:37 (Ref:1757987)   #19
JohnD
Veteran
 
JohnD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location:
North West UK
Posts: 1,074
JohnD should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJohnD should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Thanks for those links, Ger, I'll have to look them up later - it's late!

And please translate 'rips'!
Would these be ribs, made by leaving thin strips un-milled when the rest of the plate is thinned by machining?
John
JohnD is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Nov 2006, 13:10 (Ref:1758279)   #20
ger80
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Germany
Birmingham
Posts: 1,710
ger80 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnD
Thanks for those links, Ger, I'll have to look them up later - it's late!

And please translate 'rips'!
Would these be ribs, made by leaving thin strips un-milled when the rest of the plate is thinned by machining?
John
Yes, thats it. Sorry for my bad english ...
ger80 is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Nov 2006, 13:41 (Ref:1758305)   #21
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnD
I'm also interested in the composite question, Phoenix, having made non-loadbearing panels from composite GRP and paper honeycomb. Those achieved enormous weight loss and increase in stiffness (3 times lighter and ??100 times stiffer), but that I would not trust for a floor against penetration. Were you referring to alloy skins AND honeycomb?

John
In the civil aircraft industry resistance to penetration in a floor or a bulkhead is not a high priority. In the case of military aircraft it can become and important consideration. Some Helicopter floors are made from honeycomb cored laminates. The best cloths for resisting penetration use Kevlar or other aramid fibres - they are used in bullet proof vests for example. A layer of kevlar in the floor would almost certainly offer better penetration resistance than aluminium - probably on panels of the same thickness a thickness and certainly on panels of the same weight. So Kevlar skinned honeycomb panels would probably be a good - if expensive - solution. The honeycomb core could be aluminium, nomex or maybe even paper.
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Nov 2006, 13:53 (Ref:1758308)   #22
ger80
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Germany
Birmingham
Posts: 1,710
ger80 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Penetration is not a problem in civil aircrafts in the upper deck of the fuselage but its a problem in the lower deck due to the condensation water
ger80 is offline  
Quote
Old 6 Nov 2006, 08:49 (Ref:1758773)   #23
phoenix
Veteran
 
phoenix's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
European Union
Posts: 1,981
phoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridphoenix should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by ger80
Penetration is not a problem in civil aircrafts in the upper deck of the fuselage but its a problem in the lower deck due to the condensation water
I was referring penetration by hard, pointy objects that could damage the driver's legs and other lower body parts
phoenix is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Nov 2006, 02:32 (Ref:1775013)   #24
trikesrule
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 262
trikesrule should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Dimpled Floor

Hey what about a dimpled floor. I know someone else said they'd not recommend a f/glass floor but you could wrap your exhaust in Thermo-tec tape. The speedway team I crew chief for had a problem with melting the wires on the Starter. Wrapped wires and exhaust - problem solved and picked up some grunt at the same time (dyno proven). Back to dimples. I run a dimpled floor on the bottom of my gravity racer(s) (7 time consecutive champ) here in Tassie Australia. Faster with it than without. Was easy to make just laid some 450 woven rovings on a flat bit of steel sheet with a coat of PVA. Hey Presto one side had dimples the other side was nice and smooth. Trim with a 100mm diamond blade for a nice neat edge. Put some Black Pigment in the resin now everyone thinks I have a carbon floor - the twits. Also I use a Lazer Helmet with dimples and it is worth four kmh more than my Arai full face. Am fabricating a dimpled front spoiler at present for one of our cars. Always looking for more speed. Picture outside the box.........trikes
trikesrule is offline  
Quote
Old 26 Nov 2006, 02:45 (Ref:1775019)   #25
trikesrule
Racer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 262
trikesrule should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Penetration - can u feel the heat

Worried about penetration using a frp floor. How about incorporating a sheet of alloy of your preferred thickness under the seat area? U could easily fit this in with lay-up........trikes
trikesrule is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aluminium casting zefarelly Racing Technology 30 1 Oct 2009 12:12
Aluminium welding greenamex2 Racing Technology 8 21 Oct 2004 11:36
I'm nailing my socks to the floor... The Beer Baron ChampCar World Series 5 30 Oct 2002 18:19
Fatal Floor? RacerX Racing Technology 16 25 Oct 2002 01:48


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:49.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.