Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Classic Cars Monthly Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Historic Racing & Motorsport History > Motorsport History

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 27 Jan 2006, 16:24 (Ref:1510225)   #1
Catchpole
Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 34
Catchpole should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Aurora F1 championship

I am new to this sort of thing and so please forgive me if I am not as slick as some of you all.

I am collecting / collating stuff on the Aurora Chempionship and would love to hear from anyone who has pictures etc from it.

I know Dan Rear will probably look in on this and so to him, yes it's me Phil.

Particular interest is in some of the less well known competitors.

Gerd Biechtler
Warren Booth
Adrian Russell
etc.
Catchpole is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jan 2006, 09:24 (Ref:1510645)   #2
rescue dude
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
England
Posts: 860
rescue dude is a back marker
http://www.silhouet.com/motorsport/a.../aurora79.html


http://www.silhouet.com/motorsport/a.../aurora80.html

Try these links. Hope the mods are happy with me doing this.
rescue dude is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jan 2006, 09:29 (Ref:1510648)   #3
rescue dude
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
England
Posts: 860
rescue dude is a back marker
Just had a look to see if you can change the year in the URL and it works for 1978 but not others.


Hope this helps. It was a great championship.
rescue dude is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jan 2006, 11:14 (Ref:1510677)   #4
Dan Rear
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
West Lancs
Posts: 2,026
Dan Rear should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Hi Phil, glad you've found this brilliant site ! Is the Aurora book/project proceding ??
Dan Rear is offline  
Quote
Old 28 Jan 2006, 12:26 (Ref:1510706)   #5
Nordic
Veteran
 
Nordic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
West Sussex
Posts: 2,133
Nordic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Jo Castellano Ensign

J Koechlin, Peru's only F1 driver ?
Koechlin

Warren Booth
Booth
Nordic is offline  
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better.
H S Thompson 1937 - 2005
Quote
Old 29 Jan 2006, 02:49 (Ref:1511068)   #6
jondownunder
Veteran
 
jondownunder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
United Kingdom
England
Posts: 1,965
jondownunder should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridjondownunder should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by rescue dude
Just had a look to see if you can change the year in the URL and it works for 1978 but not others.
Found the other years:

'77 Shellsport: http://www.silhouet.com/motorsport/a...t/77shell.html

'82 British F1: http://www.teamdan.com/archive/gen/82ukf1.html

From the superb GEL Motorsport: http://www.silhouet.com/motorsport/
jondownunder is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Jan 2006, 09:22 (Ref:1511134)   #7
John Turner
Race Official
Veteran
 
John Turner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
United Kingdom
Pontesbury, Shropshire
Posts: 13,206
John Turner will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameJohn Turner will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameJohn Turner will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameJohn Turner will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameJohn Turner will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameJohn Turner will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameJohn Turner will be entering the Motorsport Hall of FameJohn Turner will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
OK guys, plenty of links to other sites, but are you going to actually discuss the subject on this thread? I'm sure we'd all be interested!
John Turner is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Jan 2006, 10:12 (Ref:1511151)   #8
Steve Wilkinson
Veteran
 
Steve Wilkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
United Kingdom
Southport
Posts: 2,493
Steve Wilkinson is a back marker
OK, how about this?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Turner
OK guys, plenty of links to other sites, but are you going to actually discuss the subject on this thread? I'm sure we'd all be interested!
A bit like the product it was promoting the Aurora F1 Championship was the cheap and tacky version of Formula 1 as opposed to the cheap and tacky version of Scalextic!

It never brought together a complete grid of proper F1 cars and was to some extent a marketing ploy by the organisers to get punters along to their second division events.

Discuss!

Steve Wilkinson is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Jan 2006, 10:53 (Ref:1511171)   #9
Nordic
Veteran
 
Nordic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
England
West Sussex
Posts: 2,133
Nordic should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I agree about Aurora being a poor 2nd to Scalextrix!

However the British F1 series was not all bad, it gave people the chance to see fairly modern F1's driven by some reasonable drivers on tracks that where clearly a challange.

Like most things it did go on for a season or two too long.
Nordic is offline  
__________________
Some people will tell you that slow is good - and it may be, on some days - but I am here to tell you that fast is better.
H S Thompson 1937 - 2005
Quote
Old 29 Jan 2006, 11:06 (Ref:1511177)   #10
Chris Townsend
Veteran
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
United Kingdom
London
Posts: 2,176
Chris Townsend should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Even though, as a spectator, I enjoyed much of the Aurora series, in retrospect I find myself largely agreeing with John T. Both the Aurora and the glorififed libre series that was ShellSport G8, were examples of race promoters pushing their short term interests at the expense of competitors, spectators and British motor sport in general. There simply wasn't enough money in Britain in the mid to late 70s to sustain the expense of such a championship, and instead the sponsorship deals were largely soaked up by second string drivers and teams. Remember the impact when a real young hotshoe like Geoff Lees or Stephen South appeared? There were too many races, often at circuits that could not any longer realistically accomodate an F1 car. The 1979 Aurora series was often great, but it was great almost by accident.
If the organisers and competitors had got themselves organised in the mid 70s - at a point when F5000 was failing and Atlantic booming - then a single formula series, such as Atlantic, or F2 limited to the Hart 420R, might have emerged, a step above F3 but considerably cheaper than the already ridiculously expensive Euro F2 series, in which young drivers could be measured against the benchmark of established figures such as Trimmer or Edwards.
Imagine what impact the money that Olympus put into Galica, or various sponsors into Guy Edwards, would have had if put into a cheaper, more competitive formula.

Chris
Chris Townsend is offline  
__________________
'Some days you eat the bear, some days the bear eats you.'
Quote
Old 29 Jan 2006, 11:55 (Ref:1511206)   #11
Steve Wilkinson
Veteran
 
Steve Wilkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
United Kingdom
Southport
Posts: 2,493
Steve Wilkinson is a back marker
Spot on!

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Townsend
Even though, as a spectator, I enjoyed much of the Aurora series, in retrospect I find myself largely agreeing with John T. Both the Aurora and the glorififed libre series that was ShellSport G8, were examples of race promoters pushing their short term interests at the expense of competitors, spectators and British motor sport in general. There simply wasn't enough money in Britain in the mid to late 70s to sustain the expense of such a championship, and instead the sponsorship deals were largely soaked up by second string drivers and teams. Remember the impact when a real young hotshoe like Geoff Lees or Stephen South appeared? There were too many races, often at circuits that could not any longer realistically accomodate an F1 car. The 1979 Aurora series was often great, but it was great almost by accident.
If the organisers and competitors had got themselves organised in the mid 70s - at a point when F5000 was failing and Atlantic booming - then a single formula series, such as Atlantic, or F2 limited to the Hart 420R, might have emerged, a step above F3 but considerably cheaper than the already ridiculously expensive Euro F2 series, in which young drivers could be measured against the benchmark of established figures such as Trimmer or Edwards.
Imagine what impact the money that Olympus put into Galica, or various sponsors into Guy Edwards, would have had if put into a cheaper, more competitive formula.

Chris
Chris, I think you have hit the preverbial on the head! An overly ambitious formula which if it had been scaled down could well have provided a stepping stone for up and coming drivers. I especially like the idea of a BRITISH F2 just using Hart 420R engines. Powerful, affordable and it would have allowed the young British hot-shots to run in the British F2 rounds as a bonus!

Also the point about what could have been done with the Olympus budget doesn't bear thinking about!

Steve Wilkinson is offline  
Quote
Old 29 Jan 2006, 12:18 (Ref:1511218)   #12
driftwood
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,230
driftwood has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
It would not have been practicle to have created an F2 sereis in Uk aurora ?sheelspot g8 came about due to the obsolete/ cheaper cars being available in the same way we had Libre in the 70`s and 80`s and now have BOSS type racing series now
the euro f2 series was already active and was contested by pro teams with some commercial sponsors but many privateers some with curent f2 cars and soem with previous year or 2 models
I accept the Auros ?shell sereis was no more up market than semi pro club racers racing with a few up n coming guys getting the opportunity to race f1 cars like keegan zunino kennedy( who went onto do try it for real in GP`s) but we also had the girls desire davina and Giacoamo Agostini had a season in cars and there where many true f1 cars racing arrows a1 williams mclarens plus the odd tyrrell wolf and ensigns with shadows in G8 series
you must remember it was the 70`s and early 80`s and the money was not around and marketing was not that slick as it is today
if we knew then what we know now it could have been a better series less races better tracks and maybe some more drivers of the claibre required to do teh cars justice and make better racing
lets be nostalgic about it all instead of deriding it there are many race series we can kick sand into the face of from back then and even today you only need to look at Ford and the way they have ruined FFord racing the past 10 years or even last season

As a pubescent school boy Aurora /shellsport gave me the chances to see f1 type cars in a clubby enviroment without the f1 BS that went with the GP
driftwood is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2006, 12:02 (Ref:1512659)   #13
Dan Rear
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
West Lancs
Posts: 2,026
Dan Rear should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Agree with Drifty, looking back critically is too easy Steve, John and Chris. Hindsight is wonderful of course. However, at the time, and from mid 78 to end 79, Aurora was excellent. I never regarded it as a rival to F2, never mind F1, which to my mind was an International Formula. Aurora was surely only ever intended as a National series, with a few overseas races thrown in. And despite all the carping about racing 'big' cars at Mallory, the races there were usually the best of the year.
Dan Rear is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2006, 13:29 (Ref:1512712)   #14
driftwood
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,230
driftwood has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
i do hate it when people agree with me kills the arguing stone dead !!
driftwood is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2006, 13:51 (Ref:1512723)   #15
Dan Rear
Veteran
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location:
West Lancs
Posts: 2,026
Dan Rear should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
We could argue for ever drifty about your spelling/grammar/punctuation !!!
Dan Rear is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2006, 13:57 (Ref:1512728)   #16
Steve Wilkinson
Veteran
 
Steve Wilkinson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
United Kingdom
Southport
Posts: 2,493
Steve Wilkinson is a back marker
Missed point?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Rear
Agree with Drifty, looking back critically is too easy Steve, John and Chris. Hindsight is wonderful of course. However, at the time, and from mid 78 to end 79, Aurora was excellent. I never regarded it as a rival to F2, never mind F1, which to my mind was an International Formula. Aurora was surely only ever intended as a National series, with a few overseas races thrown in. And despite all the carping about racing 'big' cars at Mallory, the races there were usually the best of the year.
Dan, you miss the point I feel. In 1978/79/80 I attended the Aurora rounds at Oulton Park. I felt the same then as I do now. The reason for attending? Well I had bought a season pass and it was 'free' to get in. I certainly wouldn't have gone without the pass and I wouldn't have spent extra in petrol and entrance costs to go to Mallory or elsewhere. In 1978 I was at the Oulton Park round on the Saturday and the following day at Donington Park for the European F2 round. Chalk and cheese!

Unfortunately the competitors in the Aurora series were going up a blind alley. The cars were not usable in anything else whereas a British F2 style of series would have permitted the more talented to use the same car in European F2 rounds.

It was certainly colourful but I can't look back on it with any nostalgic glow, it was just another Brands Hatch rip off!
Steve Wilkinson is offline  
Quote
Old 31 Jan 2006, 17:40 (Ref:1512883)   #17
driftwood
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,230
driftwood has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
have to leave something for someone to complain about !!
driftwood is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Feb 2006, 09:06 (Ref:1514065)   #18
allenbrown
OldRacingCars.com
Veteran
 
allenbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location:
Farnborough, Hampshire, England
Posts: 3,942
allenbrown should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridallenbrown should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I thought Aurora was fantastic. Some of the cars did appear in GPs (or at least in the DNQs or the DNPQs) and some of the drivers were learning their way before moving up to GPs. I thought it was great for the spectator as you got to see real F1 cars up close (and for most spectators, only F1 counts).

Whilst I see the point, in hindsight, that British drivers may have been served better by a F2 series, I don't believe that would have drawn the crowds or the sponsorship money.

We did have a British F3000 and F2 series in the 1990s but it never registered with me except to note the pitiful grids, unknown drivers and frequent cancellations. I really wouldn't have wanted that instead of Aurora.

Allen
allenbrown is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Feb 2006, 14:25 (Ref:1514251)   #19
driftwood
Veteran
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 4,230
driftwood has a lot of promise if they can keep it on the circuit!
well said Allen the 90`s UK "F2" series was a lame effort by the organisers when the real f3000 series was running across the channel albeit at a high cost
Aurora served its purpose for less than a season of euro f2 would have cost and a Blighty F2 series would not have gained momentum back then as we had numerous privateers running in F3 F2 and even f1 so aurora was ideal place to run obsolete (by1 or 2 years) cars
Try going to a sponsor and asking for money to run an f2 car when f1 will get the deal clsoed and possibly a larger amount too!!
Things have changed as more people today have "real" money to spend on this type car to race today than was available then You only need to look at TGP paddock of the past 5 years to see better equipes than of the 70`s and 80`s Aurora days

Times have changed and not necessarily for the better in some areas but that again is another argument or thread!!
driftwood is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Feb 2006, 15:21 (Ref:1514291)   #20
PeterMorley
Veteran
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
United Kingdom
Belgium
Posts: 952
PeterMorley should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridPeterMorley should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by driftwood
Things have changed as more people today have "real" money to spend on this type car to race today than was available then You only need to look at TGP paddock of the past 5 years to see better equipes than of the 70`s and 80`s Aurora days!!
Apparently John Harper used to use Brian McGuire's old Shellsport (that became Aurora?) transporter for his historic racing - presumably TGP wouldn't let him in with such a heap these days!

A lot of the TGP teams are better presented than the original F1 teams let alone Aurora - in some cases the TGP team is bigger as well.
PeterMorley is offline  
Quote
Old 2 Feb 2006, 15:47 (Ref:1514296)   #21
allenbrown
OldRacingCars.com
Veteran
 
allenbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location:
Farnborough, Hampshire, England
Posts: 3,942
allenbrown should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridallenbrown should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
There's a direct connection between Aurora and TGP. As Aurora faded out into the BF1 series and then the short-lived British Open series, the HSCC was starting its "Historically Interesting F1" races in 1982 and 1983 that led to the Historic F1 series of the late 1980s which led to TGP in the 1990s. The cars that raced in BF1 in 1982 were also racing in the HSCC series at the same time, even a nearly new Williams FW07C and moderately new Tyrrell 008s.

So Aurora never really died, it just faded into historic racing.

Allen
allenbrown is offline  
Quote
Old 3 Feb 2006, 13:16 (Ref:1514785)   #22
Pete Fenelon
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
York
Posts: 419
Pete Fenelon should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Biechteler

Quote:
Originally Posted by Catchpole
I am new to this sort of thing and so please forgive me if I am not as slick as some of you all.

I am collecting / collating stuff on the Aurora Chempionship and would love to hear from anyone who has pictures etc from it.

I know Dan Rear will probably look in on this and so to him, yes it's me Phil.

Particular interest is in some of the less well known competitors.

Gerd Biechtler
We had an interesting thread on Biechteler over on Atlas recently - I spotted his name in the '79 Race of Champions entry list (DNQ, unsurprisingly!) and hadn't heard of him.

http://forums.autosport.com/showthre...threadid=72263

Seems that he had an 'interesting' partner in Klaus Walz
Pete Fenelon is offline  
__________________
--
there's no room for enigmas in built-up areas
Quote
Old 3 Feb 2006, 13:18 (Ref:1514788)   #23
Pete Fenelon
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location:
York
Posts: 419
Pete Fenelon should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Originally Posted by allenbrown

We did have a British F3000 and F2 series in the 1990s but it never registered with me except to note the pitiful grids, unknown drivers and frequent cancellations. I really wouldn't have wanted that instead of Aurora.

Allen
Remember the 1997 'series'? -- Dino Morelli won a shortened three-car race, after which the whole shooting match was abandoned...
Pete Fenelon is offline  
__________________
--
there's no room for enigmas in built-up areas
Quote
Old 9 Feb 2006, 16:34 (Ref:1518945)   #24
bauble
Veteran
 
bauble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
England
Potton, far from the madding crowd.
Posts: 9,631
bauble will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famebauble will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famebauble will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famebauble will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famebauble will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famebauble will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famebauble will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famebauble will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famebauble will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Famebauble will be entering the Motorsport Hall of Fame
I saw lots of Aurora races and some were pretty good and some quite dire, main problem was lack of cars but overall I feel it was a great idea, just like the modern versions Euro Boss etc. After all many people only get to see one Formula 1 race each year, when there used to be quite a few around the UK.
Even second hand Benettons are better than current F£, FR etc.

Never did like Scaletrix though.
bauble is offline  
Quote
Old 22 Aug 2012, 23:26 (Ref:3123269)   #25
Thundersports
Veteran
 
Thundersports's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Balearic Islands
On the dark side of the moon
Posts: 1,660
Thundersports should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
With the demise of Euroboss as we know it to a basically European based series for late single make cars and the odd F1 car called Bossgp, there is a gap in the market for big single seaters cars built between 1985 and 1997?! I still think a series for F1/F3000 cars in original livery of this period say up to 1997 has a market, as they aren't competitive and don't want to run in Bossgp due to the hordes of 2-3 year old GP2/WSR cars present.
Thundersports is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Aurora F1/2 Photos Nordic Motorsport History 12 5 Apr 2004 18:18
Skaife Aurora blow up Gudgeon Australasian Touring Cars. 72 10 Sep 2003 10:56
the aurora engine rocket Australasian Touring Cars. 1 15 May 2003 22:31
New Aurora V8 Acj 428 Australasian Touring Cars. 19 31 Mar 2003 01:03
Aurora F1 Phil Hosker Motorsport History 2 21 Aug 2002 12:16


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:54.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.