|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
18 Nov 2019, 22:44 (Ref:3941506) | #51 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,557
|
||
|
19 Nov 2019, 00:28 (Ref:3941514) | #52 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,069
|
They were seemingly on a mission to find something - anything, potentially wrong with car 17 post-Bathurst.
Just imagine if they hadn't created that nothingburger - the next step would probably have involved running a ruler over the wreckage of car 17 at the GC600, where they would have found a goldmine of issues, including a mangled engine with gaping tolerances to comb through; and bodywork 'irregularities', such as missing doors, and splitters, etc 'out of spec' due to disintegration. |
|
|
19 Nov 2019, 00:59 (Ref:3941521) | #53 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,661
|
Quote:
Once DJRTP started telling porkies about the Fabian/Bathurst SC episode, the investigation was always going to be rigorous. Do you think if the ATO catches you out falsifying a tax return they won't scrutinise you with a fine-toothed comb next time? |
|||
__________________
Punters Beer Fest. Indy 02, Clipsal 03, Winton 04, Paperclip 05, Darwin 06, Oran Park 07, Phillip Island 08, Sandown 09, Townsville 10, Symmons 11, Eastern Creek 12, Winton 13. Townsville 14. Paperclip 15, Sandown 16, Symmons 17, PI 18, The Bend 19 |
19 Nov 2019, 01:34 (Ref:3941522) | #54 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,396
|
Oil and coolant can blend in a number of ways.
Even more so when you've got ancillary oil and water heaters that are plugged in pre start-up. I don't think that caused valves or pushrods being too long... |
|
|
19 Nov 2019, 02:42 (Ref:3941528) | #55 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
That is avoiding the question, how many sheets of paper make it an illegal engine. I am just extrapolating from your comment of "it was just a sheet of paper", if that is your basis for defense of the measurement then where do the sheets of paper stop and the motor be deemed illegal. It is a foolish way to defend an illegality because in reality there is now an open tolerance with no hard shut measurement, you must be able to see that? An unhealthy engine has nothing to do with it, if the motor can be measured then it isn't that unhealthy.
|
|
|
19 Nov 2019, 02:51 (Ref:3941529) | #56 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
I am curious about how pre-heating oil and water would result in a mix of both. Remember that they reckon it occurred on a dyno before being installed and run at the track. I have watched all the commentary on this issue for a while and now question some of the assertions being made. For all I know it may be possible because I have never pre-heated a motor at the track and I am interested in it and the problems it can cause.
|
|
|
19 Nov 2019, 02:56 (Ref:3941530) | #57 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,396
|
Quote:
|
||
|
19 Nov 2019, 03:02 (Ref:3941532) | #58 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
I guess some of this situation could be comparable to ATO, in that extending a generally-accepted 20 second SC buffer out to 47 seconds is akin to claiming double the unsubstantiated deduction limit without having receipts. But the ATO wouldn't fine you $250k for that, nor would they necessarily then proceed to disassemble and comb through a direct family member's records. But Supercars and CAMS were on an ongoing mission to hold back Car 17 one way or another, and managed to succeed on the flimsiest of evidence - a minute tolerance on some, but not all, of the valve lifts; in a crook/rooted/dying engine. |
||
|
19 Nov 2019, 04:10 (Ref:3941539) | #59 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 72
|
Quote:
The telemetry data was offered but was not presented. Not saying 12 was not over-heating - it was - but they did admit it was not the reason they slowed, and they did admit that is not the best way to cool it. |
||
|
19 Nov 2019, 04:52 (Ref:3941541) | #60 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
The Stewards had examined Supercars telemetry data for Car #12 which does reveal that the engine temperatures in Car #12 were over 110 degrees Celsius in racing conditions and that the temperature did drop during the Lap 134 Safety Car intervention.However it was the 'debris' team code instruction and what ensued which was the main issue for car 12, and they paid a handsome price for all that. The issues relevant to this topic though are the record number of scrutineering checks done on DJRTP this year (where's the 'parity'?), pinging them for a minor tolerance in a flogged engine, the big deal made in announcing the whole thing two rounds later, purposely delaying those results, and then pushing car 17 to the back of the Sandown grid after they qualified there fairly. |
||
|
19 Nov 2019, 05:12 (Ref:3941542) | #61 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,607
|
|||
|
19 Nov 2019, 05:13 (Ref:3941543) | #62 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 72
|
Supercars telemtry was considered. DJR requested to present their own telemtry but didn't, and even if they had it was a moot point anyway as they subsequetly admitted the slow down was nothing to do with the over-heating engine.
From the report: Ultimately DJRTP has not presented that telemetry data but, for the reasons explained below, even were it to support DJRTP's propositions, it would not answer nor even mitigate the breach we are considering. Minor tolerance? The spec is actually .700 with .400 lift on the cam with 1.75 rocker, but they get .010 margin...so they were actually .0135 over spec. How many sheets of paper is that? From Stewards Report: He (DRD) also explained that there is already a tolerance or margin built into the Maximum Valve Lift in the ESD because the cam lift limit and the prescribed rocker ratio yield a theoretical lift value of 0.700”. So if there was a tolerance plus a variance plus a buffer plus some leeway plus a margin for error, and they were then one sheet of paper over that? Add an allowance? Front runners have always been scrutineered more often and more rigorously than cars that finish off the podium. With the amount of success Scotty has had there is nothing unusual that his car has been checked the most. Likewise, it is no coincidence that RBHRT are the second most scrutinised team. Last edited by Jamolad; 19 Nov 2019 at 05:19. |
|
|
19 Nov 2019, 05:22 (Ref:3941544) | #63 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,069
|
“When you win lots of races, you get checked by the scrutineers,’’ Johnson said.
“That’s been the case since Adam was a boy. What we’ve seen in 2019 has been another level of scrutiny, and in over 450 checks we failed once. And that check was done on a rooted engine.” Johnson was adamant the Bathurst engine fault was a one off and the technical reports obtained by The Sunday Telegraph support his claim. |
|
|
19 Nov 2019, 05:41 (Ref:3941547) | #64 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6,607
|
Get me the world's smallest violin. What a sack of clickbait, sob story for the billionaire grey area champions.
|
||
|
19 Nov 2019, 06:36 (Ref:3941553) | #65 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,634
|
|||
|
19 Nov 2019, 06:41 (Ref:3941554) | #66 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
That's a non answer at best without some assertions of how it could or might happen so I'll let that go through the keeper to the boundary. So many assertions from so many people with no foundation in all this but this is the internet after all.
|
|
|
19 Nov 2019, 07:07 (Ref:3941557) | #67 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,396
|
||
|
19 Nov 2019, 07:18 (Ref:3941558) | #68 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,069
|
Quote:
Quote:
The owner of the team running in second-place on the other hand comes across in the media as a sook by comparison. When you look at the broader picture though, you'll see how closed the series can be, and how difficult things are made for anyone trying to introduce a new marque, particularly if they come up with something which is better designed yet still within the rules. |
|||
|
19 Nov 2019, 07:23 (Ref:3941559) | #69 | |
Veteran
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 3,211
|
It is all a whole lot of hot air, people trying to justify things with no basis of fact and sheets of paper flying around everywhere.....but this is the internet. I haven't read anything here that justifies what happened in any way. The team has not covered itself in glory and claiming harassment via the scrutineering process was definitely not a good look. Oh well, there is always next year to look forward to.
|
|
|
19 Nov 2019, 07:41 (Ref:3941562) | #70 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 72
|
||
|
19 Nov 2019, 07:54 (Ref:3941563) | #71 | |
Racer
Join Date: Mar 2019
Posts: 303
|
||
|
19 Nov 2019, 08:04 (Ref:3941568) | #72 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 72
|
Not this year, but I've seen others win multiple Bathursts and Championships without paying record fines, having unsavoury headlines in mainstream media let alone motoring media, or having their victory described as "tainted" by legends of the sport and other competitors including teams that race for the same brand.
So it can be done fairly, because of the many times it has been done fairly, but only if you want to win it fairly. |
|
|
19 Nov 2019, 08:42 (Ref:3941575) | #73 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,557
|
||
|
19 Nov 2019, 08:48 (Ref:3941576) | #74 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,557
|
You gotta be kidding surely, supercars technical department have thrown everything that could possibly thrown at the Mustang this year to stop them from winning, why wouldn't they be sceptical of any findings, it would be strange if they didn't?
|
|
|
19 Nov 2019, 09:22 (Ref:3941580) | #75 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 72
|
Not kidding, and who said DJRTP are sceptical of the findings?
With the 'debriss' BS they accepted all findings and pleaded guilty to unsporting conduct. The tech breach was there and Dick himself said it should not have happened. "The Bathurst stuff shouldn’t have happened and we’ve paid the price,’’ Johnson said. “We’ve been checked way more than any other team in pit lane and had not one other issue. We made a mistake, we’ve paid the penalty.’’ Play stupid games, win stupid prizes. |
|
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
7.30 Report tonight Tarmac Rally report | inpitlane | Australasian Touring Cars. | 10 | 28 Aug 2008 00:29 |
CAMS Statement Re QLD 500 Stewards Penalties | RaceTime | Australasian Touring Cars. | 7 | 16 Sep 2002 22:29 |
CAMS Stewards Report From Oran Park | RaceTime | Australasian Touring Cars. | 1 | 2 Aug 2002 01:49 |
New powers for stewards! Good? | Inigo Montoya | Formula One | 22 | 30 Mar 2002 02:20 |
Where the Stewards asleep at Monza? | neutral | Formula One | 11 | 22 Sep 2001 06:15 |