|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
28 Dec 2006, 21:24 (Ref:1800754) | #76 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
|
28 Dec 2006, 21:31 (Ref:1800760) | #77 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,699
|
The coupe part of the rules applies to P1 if I recall correctly. So if Porsche are disappointed with the rules involving P1 I would infer that they have considered it.
|
||
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein |
28 Dec 2006, 21:40 (Ref:1800767) | #78 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
|
28 Dec 2006, 21:44 (Ref:1800771) | #79 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,699
|
Then why comment on them? Spyders will be allowed in P2. So Porsche have nothing to fear in that respect. There have already been rumors that the P2 program could morph into a P1 program. But Porsche would maybe rather do this with an open top car. Thus the comment.
It's my speculation of course, but I am sure they have looked into P1. So why is hard to imagine that Porsche are giving the ACO a nudge? The ACO would love to have Porsche in P1. The story line is magic. Porsche know this. |
||
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein |
28 Dec 2006, 21:46 (Ref:1800774) | #80 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
|
28 Dec 2006, 23:21 (Ref:1800824) | #81 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 6,699
|
I wonder if you saw the Seinfeld exclamation point episode?
Seriously though, why argue about this? I think it's fairly logical to assume that Porsche have considered the P1 rules. They built a P2 prototype. So at some point, they would have given thought to P1. Furthermore, they are not pleased with the coupe aspect of the future P1 rules. I don't see where I'm saying anything ground breaking or untrue. Am I speculating? Sure. But I think it's a pretty safe speculation. |
||
__________________
"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." Albert Einstein |
28 Dec 2006, 23:51 (Ref:1800838) | #82 | |
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,045
|
I actually thought the most revealing part of the interview surrounded Hartmut's suggestion that we may see another Spyder (or Spyder's) in the ALMS next year - "Since interest in the U.S. is huge, we might have further news before the start of the 2007 season."
And equally revealing was the somewhat downbeat reference to the Spyder situation in Europe for 2007 - "In Europe we are still looking into different opportunities." Doesn't sound too promising to me and I've all but given up hope of seeing a Spyder at Le Mans next June. I'm convinced that Porsche expected to be there, but it looks increasingly unlikely. Very sad.......... |
|
|
29 Dec 2006, 02:50 (Ref:1800892) | #83 | ||||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||||
|
29 Dec 2006, 11:06 (Ref:1801073) | #84 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,007
|
No Porsche teams in either category announced yet, what are Embassy doing, they are my bet for an LMP2 entry in the LMS and we were told it would come soon.
|
||
|
29 Dec 2006, 11:29 (Ref:1801089) | #85 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 6,045
|
Quote:
|
||
|
29 Dec 2006, 11:43 (Ref:1801095) | #86 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,007
|
As I understand it Kenny Chen's business interests are very much in China at the moment with a booming Porsche distributorship although I think the team still exists in skeletal form. Certain elements of the team would have loved this but the cost to Mr Chen of the 2005 season was said to be frightening and he may be unwilling to spend so much again
|
||
|
29 Dec 2006, 12:58 (Ref:1801151) | #87 | ||
Rookie
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 37
|
Quote:
But unfortunately, he didn't answer this question... |
||
__________________
Endurance-Info |
3 Jan 2007, 15:43 (Ref:1805229) | #88 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4,418
|
"Feb 2007 Road & Track:
Want to go racing with an RS Spyder, which is said to be a half-second quicker than the 2006 car around Weissach? Well, you’d first have to be approved by Porsche as a viable team with a properly serious approach, and the car alone will set you back a cool $1.35 million. Rebuilds for the sealed engines, needed every 600 kilometers, will cost about $110,000." OUCH |
||
__________________
"When the fear of death out weighs the thrill of speed, brake." LG |
3 Jan 2007, 15:54 (Ref:1805234) | #89 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 573
|
It's amazing that Penske was able to rebuild the engines during races and still pull off victories. 600 KM is only 327 miles..
|
||
|
3 Jan 2007, 16:24 (Ref:1805261) | #90 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,739
|
Quote:
So at Sebring the engine builders of Porsche have to rebuild the engines 4 times... Isn't this an error? |
||
|
3 Jan 2007, 17:18 (Ref:1805293) | #91 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 5,147
|
Now, Road and Track wouldn't get that wrong, would they?
|
||
__________________
... Since all men live in darkness, who believes something is not a test of whether it is true or false. I have spent years trying to get people to ask simple questions: What is the evidence, and what does it mean? -Bill James |
4 Jan 2007, 00:55 (Ref:1805731) | #92 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Yes, one would think they must have dropped a zero off the end of that #!! As that would put it in the LeMans window. Race was 5200km +/- and testing and qualifying. So 6000km would be about right.
L.P. |
||
|
4 Jan 2007, 04:30 (Ref:1805789) | #93 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,831
|
Careful reading of the R&T article sidebar on page 107 indeed indicates 600'0' km.
|
|
|
7 Jan 2007, 23:54 (Ref:1809187) | #94 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
|||
|
8 Jan 2007, 11:35 (Ref:1809478) | #95 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
But will Champion be running the ALMS for Audi or are they put on the backburner altogether ?
Yeah , a Champion RS Spyder would look very nice indeed . |
||
|
8 Jan 2007, 17:26 (Ref:1809764) | #96 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
|
13 Jun 2007, 03:52 (Ref:1935650) | #97 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 683
|
||
|
17 Jul 2007, 16:03 (Ref:1965827) | #98 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
I thought BMS were getting their hands on 2 Spyder's ..... or has that been put on hold ?
|
||
|
17 Jul 2007, 17:23 (Ref:1965907) | #99 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2002
Posts: 6,958
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
17 Jul 2007, 19:01 (Ref:1965986) | #100 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 8,919
|
Quote:
L.P. |
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Are there any differnces between a Porsche carerra cup Porsche and GT3 class Porsche? | SALEEN S7R | Sportscar & GT Racing | 25 | 6 Feb 2008 21:06 |
Porsche 911 (997) GT3-RS | gwyllion | Sportscar & GT Racing | 50 | 5 Oct 2006 19:42 |
Where would the Porsche RS Spyder have qualified? | jukkha | Sportscar & GT Racing | 11 | 18 Jun 2006 12:02 |
Porsche RS61 Spyder #718068 history sought? | tom claridge | Motorsport History | 3 | 11 May 2003 19:48 |