|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
21 Jan 2008, 21:25 (Ref:2110812) | #26 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Just found this at Planetlemans .
Toyota officials say they are confident in taking on the challenge of the Le Mans race, saying that the company aims to win the race at its first renewed attempt. Wow , thats a big wish !!! I also feel that they should be compelled to race in a ACO sanctioned series . |
||
|
22 Jan 2008, 05:53 (Ref:2111028) | #27 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,723
|
Adam closed the equivalent thread in F1, and that is probably fair enough, but the possibility is that the F1 programe and KERS are very closely linked to this Hybrid F1 suggestion.
Depending on the ACO regs for hybrids a say 2.5ltr V8 running a full KERS regeneration system, probably with batteries rather than capacitor storage could look very attractive for LMP and be a straight spin off from the Toyota F1 development work. Remember we are now talking F1 engines stressed for 2 GP's with a safety margin. I would think a very small drop in rpm and kw levels could produce a 24hr unit. While KERS would give some improvement in fuel consumption that may be the area of most difficulty. Le Mans by the very nature of the circuit offers plenty of opportunity for regeneration from braking energy, and it's reuse. If Toyota have to develop the technology for their own F1 team plus Williams, why not go the next step and try for the much wanted Le Mans victory? It all of course depends on how the ACO looks on the potential for Hybrid technology, but the acceptance and encouragement of deisel would indicate the are more technically progressive than F1. |
||
__________________
Geting old is mandatory, acting old is optional. |
22 Jan 2008, 05:59 (Ref:2111029) | #28 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 318
|
Are F1 derived engines allowed???
|
|
__________________
R.I.P Colin McRae. |
22 Jan 2008, 06:17 (Ref:2111034) | #29 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,723
|
For a ile they were nearly compulsory.
|
||
__________________
Geting old is mandatory, acting old is optional. |
22 Jan 2008, 07:25 (Ref:2111042) | #30 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
22 Jan 2008, 07:39 (Ref:2111047) | #31 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
|
||
__________________
R.I.P Colin McRae. |
24 Jan 2008, 18:18 (Ref:2112792) | #32 | ||
Race Official
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 18,739
|
Quote:
|
||
|
24 Jan 2008, 23:09 (Ref:2112988) | #33 | |
Racer
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 254
|
Hmmm I prefer what this John Howett has to say...
|
|
|
25 Jan 2008, 02:04 (Ref:2113084) | #34 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 1,203
|
The headline and the article don't really match do they...I guess one hand said no and the other hand said, wait, not so fast there...
|
|
|
25 Jan 2008, 02:27 (Ref:2113092) | #35 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,075
|
Quote:
|
|||
__________________
Here's to the new age of Sports car/Prototypes... |
25 Jan 2008, 03:32 (Ref:2113108) | #36 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2003
Posts: 1,735
|
Rain at Indy!!!
|
||
|
25 Jan 2008, 06:46 (Ref:2113151) | #37 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 626
|
Quote:
|
||
|
25 Jan 2008, 10:58 (Ref:2113265) | #38 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,723
|
The sort of internal communication disclosed in that press article might be the reason that Toyota's race division is always in catch up mode.
|
||
__________________
Geting old is mandatory, acting old is optional. |
25 Jan 2008, 13:46 (Ref:2113359) | #39 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 2,976
|
It might just be good natured cynicism but a lot of what John Howett was putting across in the Autosport story smacked a lot of a football manager having the full confidence of the board and chairman...
I must also question any statement that asserts that there's 130% commitment to anything. To my eyes a lot of Toyota's commitment to F1 has to be in question - Le Mans is still, as they say, unfinished business, and it wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if, while the existing F1 outfit is left to muddle as it seem to have done, there's a serious contingency study about going sportscar racing. |
||
|
25 Jan 2008, 15:28 (Ref:2113412) | #40 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 2,075
|
apply the method presently used by Honda (Acura), involving their North American operations through HPD to do their program.
After all, if they want to do Le Mans, Sebring is the first major step. |
||
__________________
Here's to the new age of Sports car/Prototypes... |
25 Jan 2008, 15:58 (Ref:2113425) | #41 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 3,390
|
You should also take into account that the primary direction of questioning in the Autosport Toyota interview was around scepticism that Toyota would continue for much longer in F1 - Those circumstances aren't exactly conducive to an response that implies the company's priorities are divided
|
||
|
25 Jan 2008, 20:44 (Ref:2113616) | #42 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,723
|
Logicaly you would think Cologne should build LMS cars, and Williams the F1 cars, sharing KERS/Hybrid technology.
But whenever was there any logic in this sport? |
||
__________________
Geting old is mandatory, acting old is optional. |
26 Jan 2008, 06:21 (Ref:2113790) | #43 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,346
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
26 Jan 2008, 06:39 (Ref:2113794) | #44 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,723
|
But then Toyota would be banned like ProDrive for running a customer car!!
Sorry, forgot, SFW would be unlikely to veto that would he? Ah! What a bag of worms the Concorde has created. Now we should really return to the topic. |
||
__________________
Geting old is mandatory, acting old is optional. |
26 Jan 2008, 07:12 (Ref:2113798) | #45 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
I have a feeling that if Toyota had listened to Mike, they would have some wins in the bag by now... |
||
__________________
R.I.P Colin McRae. |
28 Jan 2008, 04:02 (Ref:2115216) | #46 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,306
|
Most expensive half ass in the world at $400 million per year. Of course the whole premise of this thread...the Toyota Le Mans thing was BS... as Shakespeare said, "Much ado about nothing."
|
|
|
28 Jan 2008, 07:07 (Ref:2115267) | #47 | |
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 318
|
Toyota seems to think throwing money at it will get wins... *shakes head*
|
|
__________________
R.I.P Colin McRae. |
28 Jan 2008, 07:32 (Ref:2115281) | #48 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 13,763
|
Well , it worked for Ferrari !!!
But yeah ..... Toyota should pull the plug after so long with no results , imo . |
||
|
29 Jan 2008, 00:38 (Ref:2115941) | #49 | ||
Racer
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 318
|
Quote:
And Toyota joined the ranks in 2002, but they didn't do the smart thing and buyout an existing team, they built their own stuff from the beginning. If they would have done what BMW did in late 2005, then Toyota probably would have wins by now |
||
__________________
R.I.P Colin McRae. |
29 Jan 2008, 05:37 (Ref:2116024) | #50 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 4,346
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Lotus to return to Le Mans racing? | Mal | ACO Regulated Series | 27 | 29 Oct 2009 01:06 |
First hybrid engine at Le Mans? | Tom908V12 | 24 Heures du Mans | 28 | 12 Jun 2008 13:55 |
[LM24] Hybrid/Wind Turbine powered Dallara for Le Mans? | RacingManiac | 24 Heures du Mans | 9 | 9 Apr 2004 15:36 |
[LM24] When do you think Porsche will return to Le Mans? | H16 | 24 Heures du Mans | 3 | 14 Nov 2001 10:38 |