Home  
Site Partners: SpotterGuides Veloce Books  
Related Sites: Baltic Touring Car Championship Your Link Here  

Go Back   TenTenths Motorsport Forum > Saloon & Sportscar Racing > Touring Car Racing

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 30 Sep 2001, 09:57 (Ref:153589)   #1
f2001
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location:
The out back
Posts: 214
f2001 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Bring Back The Supertourers !!!

Ever since 2000 the BTCC hasn't been the same.....when they introduced class B it screwed it up and when there was only three major players (Ford, Honda and Vauxhall) The 99 season was exceptional, with the Nissans going head to head. But at the begining of 2000 season I was puzzled that there was three manufactures missing !

But my point is bring back Volvo and Rydell and Aiello and Nissan !

Hi I'm new btw
f2001 is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 10:09 (Ref:153595)   #2
touringlegend
Race Official
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Panama
Posts: 8,950
touringlegend should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridtouringlegend should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridtouringlegend should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Re: Bring Back The Supertourers !!!

Quote:
Originally posted by f2001
Hi I'm new btw
I can tell...

Welcome to 10-tenths anyway
touringlegend is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 10:36 (Ref:153612)   #3
f2001
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location:
The out back
Posts: 214
f2001 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
tnx for the welcome
f2001 is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 10:39 (Ref:153613)   #4
redshoes
Veteran
 
redshoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 8,906
redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!
Welcome F2001

I think you are missing the point about Class B, it wasn't it's introduction that caused there to only be 3 works teams, it was introduced BECAUSE there was only 3 teams.
redshoes is online now  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 11:19 (Ref:153628)   #5
f2001
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location:
The out back
Posts: 214
f2001 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
yeh but since 98 major manufactures were dropping out of a good championship, why ?
f2001 is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 11:31 (Ref:153635)   #6
RevCrazy
Rookie
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 3
RevCrazy should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I agree, the new rules suck.
RevCrazy is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 11:34 (Ref:153639)   #7
Chris Y
Nature's servant
Veteran
 
Chris Y's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
United Kingdom
Over there, over here
Posts: 4,380
Chris Y has a real shot at the championship!Chris Y has a real shot at the championship!Chris Y has a real shot at the championship!Chris Y has a real shot at the championship!Chris Y has a real shot at the championship!Chris Y has a real shot at the championship!
Again, you're getting cause and effect mixed up..

The new rules were introduced this year because of the departure of the teams - the new rules are supposed to win them back!

Basically, a lot of teams were getting tired of Super Touring and the ever rising costs.
Chris Y is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 11:54 (Ref:153645)   #8
redshoes
Veteran
 
redshoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 8,906
redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!
Quote:
Originally posted by f2001
yeh but since 98 major manufactures were dropping out of a good championship, why ?
Depends on why they were there in the first place. Manufactorers go racing to promote an image or a model but there reaches a point where there is very little to be gained or their priorities change.

Peugeot - never successful and the cost of racing outweighed the amount of positive publicity they were getting.
Audi - traditionally only in motorsports to promote their quattro 4wd system, once that was banned there was little to be gained.
Volvo - now owned by Ford and they wouldn't pay for both Volvo and Ford to compete against each other.
Nissan - proved they could win and lost some of the Primera's 'mini-cab' image, job done.
BMW - always got into the weight penalty aguement of FWD vs RWD (see Audi) and did they realy want to be seen comparing a 3-series with a Vectra.
Renault - transision between old and new Laguna meant no car to race, plus changed priorities
Alfa - been there, done that, brought the T-shirt. Plus Alfa UK's market share is tiny, they would probably spend more on racing than they made selling cars.
redshoes is online now  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 12:03 (Ref:153647)   #9
f2001
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location:
The out back
Posts: 214
f2001 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
oh well once what was a brillaint championship is over (PS in the STCC Ford and Volvo race each other )
f2001 is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 12:10 (Ref:153651)   #10
redshoes
Veteran
 
redshoes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 1999
Posts: 8,906
redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!redshoes is going for a new world record!
The STCC cars aren't paid for by the manufactorers though.
redshoes is online now  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 12:57 (Ref:153666)   #11
JMeissner
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Sweden
Sweden
Posts: 2,615
JMeissner should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJMeissner should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
The Ford in STCC raced only a few (two or three) races and was entered privately, no factory support at all.

The Volvos on the other hand, Redshoes, is payed by Volvo. The Volvo team had the largest budget of all the STCC teams, 14 milion swedish kronor (1 UK £ = around 13 swedish kronor). 10 milion came straight from Volvo and the rest from Flash Engineering.
JMeissner is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 13:18 (Ref:153672)   #12
touringlegend
Race Official
Veteran
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Panama
Posts: 8,950
touringlegend should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridtouringlegend should be qualifying in the top 3 on the gridtouringlegend should be qualifying in the top 3 on the grid
Obviously not enough to win them the championship then
touringlegend is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 13:51 (Ref:153697)   #13
f2001
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location:
The out back
Posts: 214
f2001 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
yeh rosenblad still kicks there arses
f2001 is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 14:10 (Ref:153709)   #14
JMeissner
Subscriber
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jul 2000
Sweden
Sweden
Posts: 2,615
JMeissner should be qualifying in the top 5 on the gridJMeissner should be qualifying in the top 5 on the grid
Uhm, Rosenblad finished behind both of the Volvo's in the STCC Championship
JMeissner is offline  
Quote
Old 30 Sep 2001, 14:59 (Ref:153736)   #15
f2001
Racer
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location:
The out back
Posts: 214
f2001 should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
havnt been keeping up with 2001 season, but 2000 he kicked there asses just like that !
f2001 is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Oct 2001, 00:42 (Ref:154057)   #16
kmchow
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jan 1999
Location:
Vancouver, BC, CANADA
Posts: 3,919
kmchow should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
JMeissner wrote:

>The Volvos on the other hand, Redshoes, is payed by Volvo. The Volvo >team had the largest budget of all the STCC teams, 14 milion swedish >kronor (1 UK £ = around 13 swedish kronor). 10 milion came straight >from Volvo and the rest from Flash Engineering.
>
Wow, only 1.5M US to "buy", errr, win a championship!! That's a bargain compared to the other championships. Honda should try to take the STCC championship as well!!
kmchow is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Oct 2001, 01:33 (Ref:154065)   #17
Radisichrox
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
United States
New York
Posts: 1,424
Radisichrox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Bring Back The Supertourers !!!

Quote:
Originally posted by f2001
Ever since 2000 the BTCC hasn't been the same.....when they introduced class B it screwed it up and when there was only three major players (Ford, Honda and Vauxhall) The 99 season was exceptional, with the Nissans going head to head. But at the begining of 2000 season I was puzzled that there was three manufactures missing !

But my point is bring back Volvo and Rydell and Aiello and Nissan !

Hi I'm new btw
99 was a weak season, other than the fact that Matt Neal won a race, was there any other competition to the Nissans??? No...
If you read on you will find out that it was becoming too expensive for Super Touring to continue, and that's why those 3 manufactures were missing in 2000. Besides, in 2000, it gave all of the works drivers a chance to compete, wheras in the past you had to be awesome to be able to compete with the best.

First of all Laurant Aiello is a boring driver, no personality, a lot like Rydell, no personality on or off the track. However, both of them are insanely quick on a clear track.
Radisichrox is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Oct 2001, 11:55 (Ref:154209)   #18
Paul Rayner
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location:
Preston, Lancashire, UK
Posts: 1,066
Paul Rayner should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Re: Re: Bring Back The Supertourers !!!

Quote:
Originally posted by Radisichrox
99 was a weak season, other than the fact that Matt Neal won a race, was there any other competition to the Nissans??? No...
What was Matt Neal driving again?

Quote:
Originally posted by Radisichrox
Besides, in 2000, it gave all of the works drivers a chance to compete, wheras in the past you had to be awesome to be able to compete with the best.
It was just every Ford driver that had a chance really. Sure, each manufacturer won, but one week Ford would have ballast and Vauxhall would stand a chance. The next meeting Vauxhall would have ballast, and Ford would kick their arses.

I definitely prefer 2001 to 2000, I just hope that 2002 is better than 1999. For me it's the domination that they've got to stop.
I've said it before:
ANYTHING BUT A VAUXHALL TO WIN AT BRANDS! PLEASE!!!!!
Paul Rayner is offline  
Quote
Old 1 Oct 2001, 23:03 (Ref:154594)   #19
Guy Goddard
Racer
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Posts: 374
Guy Goddard should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
We certainly need more manufacturers in the BTCC and also well known drivers, Menu,Rydell,Neal to name a few. My contacts tell me that the BBC are to pull the plug on covering the series and to be fair im not suprised as its been like watching paint dry this year....

Seeing a Vauhall win every time is not what the fans want, hopefully MG is going to kick their buts next year.
Guy Goddard is offline  
Quote
Old 4 Oct 2001, 12:56 (Ref:155774)   #20
touringcarnut
Veteran
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
India
Hyderabad, India
Posts: 872
touringcarnut should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
the seris was just too expensive in the late 1990s and it showed in 2000 when there were only 3 manufacturers. The seris is different now, and needs some time to develop, we've got 5 manufacturers of cars in this season now (yeah, i know that 2 are private teams). next season will see this number grow e.g. Proton, and this years cars could all be used to race in the next season.
touringcarnut is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Oct 2001, 11:34 (Ref:156200)   #21
Dan Friel
Veteran
 
Dan Friel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
England
Great Cheverell, UK
Posts: 2,211
Dan Friel should be qualifying in the top 10 on the gridDan Friel should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
Quote:
Ever since 2000 the BTCC hasn't been the same
More like ever since 1995.... get rid of wings.

And more like BTCC has ruined the NSC, which far surpassed anything the BTCC has been since 1995.
Dan Friel is offline  
Quote
Old 5 Oct 2001, 19:08 (Ref:156407)   #22
Radisichrox
Veteran
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
United States
New York
Posts: 1,424
Radisichrox should be qualifying in the top 10 on the grid
I agree with Dan. Although I know very little about the NSC, it is clear to me that racing was clearly better without wings and spoilers. If you want close racing, along with overtaking, get rid of wings! However, even BTCC with wings is more exciting than Formula 1 nowaday!
Radisichrox is offline  
Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bring back Procar davyboy Formula One 47 25 Jan 2007 20:39
Bring back the B-pillar moses Australasian Touring Cars. 25 30 Nov 2005 13:32
Bring him back Also a Believer Australasian Touring Cars. 73 27 May 2004 05:07
Bring back the bags Crash Test Australasian Touring Cars. 11 13 Nov 2002 00:48


All times are GMT. The time now is 22:16.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Original Website Copyright © 1998-2003 Craig Antil. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2004-2021 Royalridge Computing. All Rights Reserved.
Ten-Tenths Motorsport Forums Copyright © 2021-2022 Grant MacDonald. All Rights Reserved.