|
||||||||||
|
||||||||||
22 Nov 2004, 18:07 (Ref:1161035) | #51 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,294
|
Ganassi and Andretti will be getting more than boos from myself if I was to attend!
Think Figo after he went from Barcelona to Real Madrid... |
||
__________________
Sunderland Til I Die! |
22 Nov 2004, 18:19 (Ref:1161049) | #52 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,301
|
Not quoting you out of context macdaddy. Just using your quote to embelish my feelings toward those specific teams. I understand exactly where you are coming from and agree with you.
|
||
__________________
A good friend will come bail you out of jail. A true freind will be sitting next to you saying "Damn...that was fun!" |
22 Nov 2004, 19:20 (Ref:1161095) | #53 | |||
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 161
|
Quote:
|
|||
|
22 Nov 2004, 21:09 (Ref:1161182) | #54 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 995
|
Quote:
I know you have your opinion that Newman Haas has these magical setups that give them a huge advantage, but I just don't buy that. I've worked on race cars, done aligmnents and setup on race cars, and most importantly raced race cars. Setting up a car is not rocket science. There is no magic setup that will work well for all drivers. Every drive has a different driving style. One driver can drive a car and say it has horrible understeer and a different driver could drive it and say it oversteers. Its all about driving style and learning to adapt to a cars setup. Some setups are inherently good and bad though. I won't argue that Newman Haas has SOME advantage having been around as long as they have, but the fact is, they have the best drivers, and great engineers. The other teams will catch up after they've been around the series for a few years. It really helps when a driver and engineer can work together for multiple years so that they can work together to get a setup that works for the driver. Ok, I think I'm done. |
|||
|
22 Nov 2004, 21:16 (Ref:1161193) | #55 | |
Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 6,885
|
I find it strange that some fans want teams or drivers to return that just tried to off champcar in recent times as well as bashing champcar at every opportunity. I want to keep the cancer that previously infected CART in remission.
|
|
__________________
Wolverines! |
22 Nov 2004, 21:54 (Ref:1161243) | #56 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2001
Posts: 13,000
|
Roger Penske didn't try to kill CART. Nor did Chip Ganassi, Dario Franchitti, Tony Kanaan or anyone else. They made business decisions based on which series was likely to give them the best outcome. The person most responsible for CART's current problems is Joe Heitzler.
|
||
|
23 Nov 2004, 16:27 (Ref:1161877) | #57 | |||
Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 4,744
|
Quote:
NH's setups aren't magic, but they are better. The past couple of years they've built on very successful setups. It means that if they did nothing but use the previous year's setup they've got a decent qualifying position. While the other teams are trying to figure a reasonable setup NH is fine tuning their pole winning qualifying setup. Ultimately it means they have an advantage that is hard to beat by teams that are less capable of developing setups. I don't think the other teams will catch up until their engineers get good through experience or they hire good engineers. I'd tend to disagree that setups aren't rocket science. In fact it's more cost effective to send people into space than to develop a F1 setup. I know it's foolish to argue this point with you of all people here, but don't you think that when developing a setup that adapting to the car is more important than driver style? My understanding has always been that teams develop setups to be fast and only tweak them to a driver's preference so that it is more likely that the driver will be able to be successful with the car. Correct/incorrect? My only personal experience with this kind of setup is with racing sims, which only begins to scatch the surface. It's remarkably hard to read telemetry to optimize only 15 settings to perfectly compromise each setting for a lap. Last edited by Snrub; 23 Nov 2004 at 16:33. |
|||
__________________
No Rotor, No Motor. |
24 Nov 2004, 09:08 (Ref:1162554) | #58 | |
Rookie
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 12
|
Wonder if Russo and Eric also talked about Justin's move?
|
|
|
24 Nov 2004, 12:11 (Ref:1162685) | #59 | ||
Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,536
|
i would welcome most teams back i think- after all they all formed the landscape of openwheel, before the split-andretti green, well i would love Kanaan and dario back in champcars...and herta!
Penske, he did what he could i suppose, but toyota had other plans really, the captain and his team are as stalwart in champcar as a black number 3 was in NASCAR, can we do well with out it, yes ofcourse, but it is good to have it around, for the better. in fact bring them all back, this series was the contemporary sideways move to f1 and top series in the world what happened? if we have learned anything from school, united we stand. |
||
__________________
SuperTrucks rule- end of story. Listen to my ramblings! Follow my twitter @davidAET I am shameless ... |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Eric Jensen Radio Interview | TedN | ChampCar World Series | 17 | 28 May 2005 16:30 |
Eric Jensen Motorsports | TedN | ChampCar World Series | 112 | 10 Apr 2005 02:48 |
eric to austin.... | gomick | Bike Racing | 5 | 23 Nov 2003 11:51 |